GHSA-8ffj-4hx4-9pgf
MEDIUMGHSA-8ffj-4hx4-9pgf is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.2) CWE-347 vulnerability in lightrag-hku. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-8ffj-4hx4-9pgf is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
lightrag-hku: JWT Algorithm Confusion Vulnerability
Blast Radius
lightrag-hkuReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The LightRAG API is vulnerable to a JWT algorithm confusion attack where an attacker can forge tokens by specifying 'alg': 'none' in the JWT header. Since the jwt.decode() call does not explicitly deny the 'none' algorithm, a crafted token without a signature will be accepted as valid, leading to unauthorized access.
Details
In lightrag/api/auth.py at line 128, the validate_token method calls:
payload = jwt.decode(token, self.secret, algorithms=[self.algorithm])
This allows any algorithm listed in the token's header to be processed, including 'none'. The code does not explicitly specify that 'none' is not allowed, making it possible for an attacker to bypass authentication.
PoC
An attacker can generate a JWT with the following structure:
{
"header": {
"alg": "none",
"typ": "JWT"
},
"payload": {
"sub": "admin",
"exp": 1700000000,
"role": "admin"
}
}
Then send a request like:
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJub25lIiwidHlwIjoiSldUIn0.eyJzdWIiOiJhZG1pbiIsImV4cCI6MTcwMDAwMDAwMCwicm9sZSI6ImFkbWluIn0." http://localhost:8000/api/protected-endpoint
Impact
An attacker can impersonate any user, including administrators, by forging a JWT with 'alg': 'none', gaining full access to protected resources without needing valid credentials.
Recommended Fix
Explicitly specify allowed algorithms and exclude 'none'. Modify the validate_token method to:
allowed_algorithms = [self.algorithm] if self.algorithm != 'none' else ['HS256', 'HS384', 'HS512']
payload = jwt.decode(token, self.secret, algorithms=allowed_algorithms)
Or better yet, hardcode the expected algorithm(s):
payload = jwt.decode(token, self.secret, algorithms=['HS256'])
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | lightrag-hku | all versions | 1.4.14 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for lightrag-hku. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update lightrag-hku to 1.4.14 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-8ffj-4hx4-9pgf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-8ffj-4hx4-9pgf is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-8ffj-4hx4-9pgf. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-8ffj-4hx4-9pgf in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-8ffj-4hx4-9pgf across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.