Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-8c4j-f57c-35cf

Langflow: Authenticated Users Can Read, Modify, and Delete Any Flow via Missing Ownership Check

Also known asCVE-2026-34046
Published
Mar 27, 2026
Updated
Mar 27, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk32th percentile+0.37%
0.00%0.30%0.60%0.91%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.4%Apr 26Jun 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

2 pkgs affected
🐍langflow🐍langflow-base

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Vulnerability

IDOR in GET/PATCH/DELETE /api/v1/flow/{flow_id}

The _read_flow helper in src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/flows.py branched on the AUTO_LOGIN setting to decide whether to filter by user_id. When AUTO_LOGIN was False (i.e., authentication was enabled), neither branch enforced an ownership check — the query returned any flow matching the given UUID regardless of who owned it.

This exposed any authenticated user to:

  • Read any other user's flow, including embedded plaintext API keys
  • Modify the logic of another user's AI agents
  • Delete flows belonging to other users

The vulnerability was introduced by the conditional logic that was meant to accommodate public/example flows (those with user_id = NULL) under auto-login mode, but inadvertently left the authenticated path without an ownership filter.


Fix (PR #8956)

The fix removes the AUTO_LOGIN conditional entirely and unconditionally scopes the query to the requesting user:

-    auth_settings = settings_service.auth_settings
-    stmt = select(Flow).where(Flow.id == flow_id)
-    if auth_settings.AUTO_LOGIN:
-        stmt = stmt.where(
-            (Flow.user_id == user_id) | (Flow.user_id == None)  # noqa: E711
-        )
+    stmt = select(Flow).where(Flow.id == flow_id).where(Flow.user_id == user_id)

All three operations — read, update, and delete — route through _read_flow, so the single change covers the full attack surface. A cross-user isolation test (test_read_flows_user_isolation) was added to prevent regression.


Acknowledgements

Langflow thanks the security researcher who responsibly disclosed this vulnerability:

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIlangflowall versions1.5.1
🐍PyPIlangflow-baseall versions0.5.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for langflow. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update langflow to 1.5.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-8c4j-f57c-35cf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-8c4j-f57c-35cf is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-8c4j-f57c-35cf. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Vulnerability ### IDOR in `GET/PATCH/DELETE /api/v1/flow/{flow_id}` The `_read_flow` helper in `src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/flows.py` branched on the `AUTO_LOGIN` setting to decide whether to filter by `user_id`. When `AUTO_LOGIN` was `False` (i.e., authentication was enabled), neither branch enforced an ownership check — the query returned any flow matching the given UUID regardless of who owned it. This exposed any authenticated user to: - **Read** any other user's flow, including embedded plaintext API keys - **Modify** the logic of another user's AI agents - **Delete** flows be
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-8c4j-f57c-35cf in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-8c4j-f57c-35cf across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.