deepstream: PATCH_MULTI action bypasses Valve permission system allowing unauthorized record writesGHSA-89vx-jh4q-vg3w
HIGHFix: deepstreamIO/deepstream.io@1c2addeGHSA-89vx-jh4q-vg3w is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) CWE-862 vulnerability in @deepstream/server. A fix is available for @deepstream/server — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-89vx-jh4q-vg3w.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-89vx-jh4q-vg3w by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
@deepstream/servernpmDescription
Summary
The RECORD_ACTION.PATCH_MULTI action is not registered in the Valve permission system's RULES_MAP (src/services/permission/valve/rules-map.ts). When ConfigPermission.canPerformAction() is called for a PATCH_MULTI message, getRulesForMessage() returns null because the action is missing from the map. This triggers an unconditional allow (callback(..., null, true)), completely bypassing all configured Valve permission rules.
Any authenticated user — regardless of their configured permissions — can write arbitrary data to any record using the PATCH_MULTI action.
Root Cause
In src/services/permission/valve/rules-map.ts lines 38-54, the RULES_MAP[TOPIC.RECORD].actions dictionary maps record actions to permission rule types. The actions registered include: SUBSCRIBE, SUBSCRIBEANDHEAD, SUBSCRIBEANDREAD, READ, HEAD, LISTEN, CREATE, UPDATE, PATCH, NOTIFY, DELETE, ERASE. However, RECORD_ACTION.PATCH_MULTI is absent from this map.
When getRulesForMessage() at line 86-99 encounters an action not in the map, it returns null. In config-permission.ts at line 88-93, when ruleSpecification === null, the callback is invoked with true (allow) unconditionally.
Attack Chain
- Attacker authenticates with any valid credentials (even a minimal-privilege user)
- Attacker sends a WebSocket message:
{topic: RECORD, action: PATCH_MULTI, name: "admin/secret-record", parsedData: [{path: "role", data: "admin"}]} message-processor.ts:68invokes permission checkconfig-permission.ts:89→getRulesForMessage()returnsnullfor PATCH_MULTIconfig-permission.ts:92→ unconditional ALLOW- Record transition applies the operations — arbitrary record is modified
Impact
- Complete Valve permission bypass for record writes — all configured permission rules are irrelevant
- Any authenticated user can overwrite any record, including admin-only records
- Mass record overwrites can destroy application state, corrupt sessions, cause service outage
- Only exploitable when
permission.typeis set toconfig(Valve) — the recommended production configuration per deepstream documentation - Default permission type
none(OpenPermission) allows everything already, so default deployments are unaffected
// Connect as a minimal-privilege user
const { DeepstreamClient } = require('@deepstream/client');
const client = new DeepstreamClient('localhost:6020');
await client.login({ username: 'restricted-user', password: 'password' });
// This should be blocked by Valve permissions but isn't:
// Send raw PATCH_MULTI message to bypass all permission rules
const connection = client.getConnection();
connection.sendMessage({
topic: 0x52, // TOPIC.RECORD
action: 0x50, // RECORD_ACTION.PATCH_MULTI (check actual enum value)
name: 'admin/protected-record',
parsedData: [
{ path: 'permissions', data: 'admin' },
{ path: 'secret', data: 'overwritten' }
]
});
</details>
Suggested Fix
Add PATCH_MULTI to the RULES_MAP in src/services/permission/valve/rules-map.ts:
[RECORD_ACTION.PATCH_MULTI]: RULE_TYPES.WRITE,
This maps PATCH_MULTI operations to the same WRITE permission rule that governs UPDATE and PATCH.
Affected Versions
All versions that include PATCH_MULTI support with the Valve (ConfigPermission) permission system. The PATCH_MULTI action was added in commit 82ffa8119d8f4a8242ac5c3507469a22de746b65 but was never registered in RULES_MAP.
Credit
Vulnerability discovered by Zhixi "Jace" Sun of ASM/VI at TikTok.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | @deepstream/server | ≥ 10.1.0&&< 10.1.1 | 10.1.1npm install @deepstream/server@10.1.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @deepstream/server, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update @deepstream/server to 10.1.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-89vx-jh4q-vg3w is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-89vx-jh4q-vg3w in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.