GHSA-89c6-vpcj-7vj4 — obi
MEDIUMGHSA-89c6-vpcj-7vj4 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.9) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in go.opentelemetry.io/obi. A fix is available for go.opentelemetry.io/obi — see the affected versions and patch details below.
OpenTelemetry eBPF Instrumentation: Unbounded BPF internal metrics replay can exhaust CPU
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-89c6-vpcj-7vj4.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-89c6-vpcj-7vj4 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,842 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
go.opentelemetry.io/obiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
OBI replays BPF probe hits into histogram observations by looping once per recorded run count. On busy systems, the run-count delta can become very large, causing the metrics exporter to spend excessive CPU time in a tight loop every collection interval.
Details
The vulnerable loop is in pkg/export/prom/prom_bpf.go. During each metrics tick, OBI iterates through probeMetrics and then executes for range metric.count, invoking BpfProbeLatency(...) for each individual recorded hit.
The count comes from calculateStats() in the same file, where deltaCount := bp.runCount - bp.prevRunCount is calculated and returned without any cap before the per-hit replay loop.
If probe activity spikes between scrape intervals, deltaCount can be very large. The exporter then spends CPU time proportional to the number of probe hits rather than the number of metric series.
PoC
Local testing with a small reproducer confirmed the replay-loop behavior and showed CPU scaling with the recorded hit count rather than the number of metric series.
Use a vulnerable build and enable internal metrics export:
git checkout v0.0.0-rc.1+build
make build
export OTEL_EBPF_INTERNAL_METRICS_PROMETHEUS_PORT=9090
sudo ./bin/obi
Create a high-rate workload that repeatedly exercises traced probes. For example, generate HTTP traffic against an instrumented service:
python3 -m http.server 18081
Then drive it:
seq 1 500000 | xargs -P 128 -I{} curl -s http://127.0.0.1:18081 >/dev/null
At the same time, scrape metrics repeatedly:
while true; do curl -s http://127.0.0.1:9090/metrics >/dev/null; done
On a vulnerable build, OBI CPU consumption rises sharply during the metrics loop because histogram updates are replayed once per counted probe execution. The effect is visible in top or pidstat and is most pronounced under sustained high request volume.
Impact
This is an availability issue in the internal metrics path. Any deployment that enables BPF internal metrics and traces busy workloads is affected. Attackers can indirectly consume CPU in the privileged agent by driving enough activity through instrumented services.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | go.opentelemetry.io/obi | all versions | 0.9.0go get go.opentelemetry.io/obi@v0.9.0 |
Affected Products
ebpf instrumentationopentelemetryDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for go.opentelemetry.io/obi, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update go.opentelemetry.io/obi to 0.9.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-89c6-vpcj-7vj4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-89c6-vpcj-7vj4 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.