Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-88jx-383q-w4qc

MEDIUM

Cosign malicious attachments can cause system-wide denial of service

Also known asBIT-cosign-2024-29902CVE-2024-29902GO-2024-2718
Published
Apr 11, 2024
Updated
Feb 4, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
1 / 2
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.7%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk47th percentile+0.45%
0.00%0.39%0.77%1.16%0.2%0.7%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

2 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/sigstore/cosign🐹github.com/sigstore/cosign/v2

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

A remote image with a malicious attachment can cause denial of service of the host machine running Cosign. This can impact other services on the machine that rely on having memory available such as a Redis database which can result in data loss. It can also impact the availability of other services on the machine that will not be available for the duration of the machine denial.

Details

The root cause of this issue is that Cosign reads the attachment from a remote image entirely into memory without checking the size of the attachment first. As such, a large attachment can make Cosign read a large attachment into memory; If the attachments size is larger than the machine has memory available, the machine will be denied of service. The Go runtime will make a SIGKILL after a few seconds of system-wide denial.

The root cause is that Cosign reads the contents of the attachments entirely into memory on line 238 below:

https://github.com/sigstore/cosign/blob/9bc3ee309bf35d2f6e17f5d23f231a3d8bf580bc/pkg/oci/remote/remote.go#L228-L239

...and prior to that, neither Cosign nor go-containerregistry checks the size of the attachment and enforces a max cap. In the case of a remote layer of f *attached, go-containerregistry will invoke this API:

https://github.com/google/go-containerregistry/blob/a0658aa1d0cc7a7f1bcc4a3af9155335b6943f40/pkg/v1/remote/layer.go#L36-L40

func (rl *remoteLayer) Compressed() (io.ReadCloser, error) {
	// We don't want to log binary layers -- this can break terminals.
	ctx := redact.NewContext(rl.ctx, "omitting binary blobs from logs")
	return rl.fetcher.fetchBlob(ctx, verify.SizeUnknown, rl.digest)
}

Notice that the second argument to rl.fetcher.fetchBlob is verify.SizeUnknown which results in not using the io.LimitReader in verify.ReadCloser: https://github.com/google/go-containerregistry/blob/a0658aa1d0cc7a7f1bcc4a3af9155335b6943f40/internal/verify/verify.go#L82-L100

func ReadCloser(r io.ReadCloser, size int64, h v1.Hash) (io.ReadCloser, error) {
	w, err := v1.Hasher(h.Algorithm)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}
	r2 := io.TeeReader(r, w) // pass all writes to the hasher.
	if size != SizeUnknown {
		r2 = io.LimitReader(r2, size) // if we know the size, limit to that size.
	}
	return &and.ReadCloser{
		Reader: &verifyReader{
			inner:    r2,
			hasher:   w,
			expected: h,
			wantSize: size,
		},
		CloseFunc: r.Close,
	}, nil
}

Impact

This issue can allow a supply-chain escalation from a compromised registry to the Cosign user: If an attacher has compromised a registry or the account of an image vendor, they can include a malicious attachment and hurt the image consumer.

Remediation

Update to the latest version of Cosign, which limits the number of attachments. An environment variable can override this value.

Affected Packages

2 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/sigstore/cosignall versionsNo fix
🐹Gogithub.com/sigstore/cosign/v2all versions2.2.4

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/sigstore/cosign. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    No patched version of github.com/sigstore/cosign has shipped for GHSA-88jx-383q-w4qc yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-88jx-383q-w4qc is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-88jx-383q-w4qc. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary A remote image with a malicious attachment can cause denial of service of the host machine running Cosign. This can impact other services on the machine that rely on having memory available such as a Redis database which can result in data loss. It can also impact the availability of other services on the machine that will not be available for the duration of the machine denial. ### Details The root cause of this issue is that Cosign reads the attachment from a remote image entirely into memory without checking the size of the attachment first. As such, a large attachment can make
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-88jx-383q-w4qc in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-88jx-383q-w4qc across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.