GHSA-88fw-v6x4-3f58 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in org.springframework.data:spring-data-commons. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-88fw-v6x4-3f58 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Spring Data: Unbounded property-path cache keyed by externally-supplied path string
Real-World Exposure
org.springframework.data:spring-data-commons☕org.springframework.data:spring-data-commons☕org.springframework.data:spring-data-commonsReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
src/main/java/org/springframework/data/mapping/context/PersistentPropertyPathFactory.java:175 · Unbounded Resource Allocation (Algorithmic DoS)
Impact
When a consuming module routes user-supplied dot-paths (sort parameters, projection paths, PATCH paths) through MappingContext.getPersistentPropertyPath(String, Class), each distinct string — including invalid ones — is cached forever. A remote attacker can send millions of requests with unique ?sort=aaaa<n> values and grow the heap until the service OOMs.
Description
PersistentPropertyPathFactory.propertyPaths (line 53) is a ConcurrentHashMap<TypeAndPath, PathResolution> populated by getPotentiallyCachedPath() (line 174-177) via computeIfAbsent. The key is (TypeInformation, rawPathString). Crucially, unresolvable paths are also cached (as PathResolution.unresolved, line 204) so that the same InvalidPersistentPropertyPath can be re-thrown — meaning every distinct garbage string an attacker sends creates a permanent entry. There is no eviction. This is reachable from AbstractMappingContext.getPersistentPropertyPath(String, Class) (AbstractMappingContext.java:345), which Spring Data REST and several store query mappers call with HTTP-request-derived sort/filter property names.
By contrast, the sibling SimplePropertyPath.cache was already hardened to use ConcurrentReferenceHashMap (soft refs); this cache was not given the same treatment.
Exploit scenario
Against a Spring Data REST endpoint, an attacker scripts GET /things?sort=<random-40-char-string> in a loop. Each request fails fast with InvalidPersistentPropertyPath, but each distinct random string leaves behind a TypeAndPath key, a PathResolution object holding the split segments list, and the source string in the map. After ~10M requests the JVM OOMs.
Preconditions
- A downstream component (Spring Data REST, a store-specific
QueryMapper, or application code) passes externally-supplied strings toMappingContext.getPersistentPropertyPath(String, ...) - No upstream rate-limiting or path-string validation
How to fix
A cache whose key can be derived from external input must be bounded. Replace propertyPaths (line 53) with a ConcurrentLruCache<TypeAndPath, PathResolution> of fixed capacity, or ConcurrentReferenceHashMap (matching the sibling SimplePropertyPath.cache). Additionally, do not cache PathResolution.unresolved results at all (line 204 in createPersistentPropertyPath) — re-computing a failed lookup is cheap, and caching negative results for arbitrary attacker strings is what makes this exploitable.
Adversarial verification
Verdict: TRUE_POSITIVE (confidence: 7/10) — unbounded hard-ref ConcurrentHashMap keyed by raw path string, caches unresolved entries (line 204), reachable via public MappingContext.getPersistentPropertyPath(String, ...); sibling PropertyPath cache was already converted to soft-refs but this one was missed. -3 confidence because the HTTP-input wiring lives in downstream modules (Spring Data REST / store mappers), not verifiable in this repo.
Code at the line — CONFIRMED
- Line 53:
private final Map<TypeAndPath, PathResolution> propertyPaths = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();— plain CHM, hard refs, no eviction, no size bound. - Line 175:
propertyPaths.computeIfAbsent(TypeAndPath.of(type, propertyPath), ...)— every distinct(type, string)pair is inserted. - Line 204:
return PathResolution.unresolved(parts, segment, type, currentPath);— returned from insidecomputeIfAbsent's mapping function, so unresolvable paths are cached. ThePathResolutionretains the full attacker string (source = StringUtils.collectionToDelimitedString(parts, "."), line 452).
Callers within spring-data-commons
AbstractMappingContext.getPersistentPropertyPath(String, Class<?>)(line 345) and(String, TypeInformation<?>)(line 350) →persistentPropertyPathFactory.from(type, propertyPath)→ straight into the unbounded cache. No validation, noPropertyPath.fromgate.- This is the public
MappingContextinterface (MappingContext.java:174,186), documented to throwInvalidPersistentPropertyPathon bad input — i.e., the contract explicitly anticipates being called with possibly-invalid strings. - No in-repo caller routes HTTP input directly into the
Stringoverload. TheSort.Order.property→getPersistentPropertyPath(String, ...)bridge lives in store modules (Spring Data MongoDBQueryMapper, Spring Data REST sort translator). That wiring is out-of-repo as the finding states.
Protections — NONE on this cache
Contrast: SimplePropertyPath.java:52 (the PropertyPath.from cache) uses ConcurrentReferenceHashMap (soft refs, GC-evictable). Spring already hardened the sibling cache against exactly this pattern. PersistentPropertyPathFactory.propertyPaths was not given the same treatment.
Stress-test
Is this exclusion #3 (intended design)? The PathResolution javadoc (line 426-430) says caching unresolved paths is deliberate — to make repeated lookups of the same bad path cheap. But unbounded hard-ref caching of arbitrary attacker-chosen keys is not the intent; the sibling fix proves Spring considers this a bug class.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | org.springframework.data:spring-data-commons | ≥ 4.0.0&&< 4.0.6 | 4.0.6 |
| ☕Maven | org.springframework.data:spring-data-commons | ≥ 3.5.0&&< 3.5.12 | 3.5.12 |
| ☕Maven | org.springframework.data:spring-data-commons | ≥ 3.4.0 | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for org.springframework.data:spring-data-commons. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update org.springframework.data:spring-data-commons to 4.0.6 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-88fw-v6x4-3f58 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-88fw-v6x4-3f58 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-88fw-v6x4-3f58. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-88fw-v6x4-3f58 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-88fw-v6x4-3f58 across Maven dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.