ApostropheCMS: Unauthenticated resource exhaustion via pre-auth aposBigUpload processing in @apostrophecms/import-exportGHSA-86wm-68pq-5jwq
HIGHFix: apostrophecms/apostrophe@9500b8bGHSA-86wm-68pq-5jwq is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in apostrophe. A fix is available for apostrophe — see the affected versions and patch details below.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-86wm-68pq-5jwq by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
apostrophenpm@apostrophecms/import-exportnpmDescription
Summary
A potential unauthenticated denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the chunked import upload path used by @apostrophecms/import-export.
The affected import API routes invoke:
self.apos.http.bigUploadMiddleware()
before the actual import handler performs its authentication check.
Because no authorize callback is supplied to bigUploadMiddleware(), unauthenticated requests can reach the aposBigUpload start, chunk, and end operations before the later req.user check rejects the import.
As a result, an unauthenticated remote attacker can create server-side upload state, write chunk data to upload storage, trigger temporary-file processing, and cause attacker-controlled cleanup operations before authentication is enforced.
Affected Component
Package:
@apostrophecms/import-export
Confirmed affected version:
3.6.2
Potential earlier affected versions:
The issue may affect earlier 3.x releases in which the current big-upload-based import implementation is present. I have not yet fully verified the exact introduction version and recommend that the maintainers confirm the affected version range.
Vulnerability Type
Primary:
CWE-400 — Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Related:
CWE-306 — Missing Authentication for Critical Function
CWE-770 — Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Technical Details
The page import route registers the following middleware chain:
packages/import-export/modules/@apostrophecms/import-export-page/index.js
importExportImport: [
self.apos.http.bigUploadMiddleware(),
async (req) => {
return self.apos.modules['@apostrophecms/import-export']
.import(req, self.__meta.name);
}
]
No authorize callback is passed to bigUploadMiddleware().
The bigUploadMiddleware() implementation explicitly supports an authorize callback and performs that authorization before processing the aposBigUpload protocol when supplied.
Without that callback, requests containing:
aposBigUpload[type]=start
aposBigUpload[type]=chunk
or
aposBigUpload[type]=end
are processed immediately.
The actual authentication check occurs later in:
packages/import-export/lib/methods/import.js
async import(req, moduleName) {
if (!req.user) {
throw self.apos.error('forbidden');
}
This means authentication occurs only after the chunked-upload middleware has already performed server-side work.
Attack Flow
1. Start
An unauthenticated attacker submits an aposBigUpload[type]=start request.
The server generates an upload ID and stores attacker-supplied upload metadata, including the declared chunks count.
2. Chunk
The attacker can upload chunk data.
bigUploadChunk() copies attacker-controlled data into:
/big-uploads/<id>-<n>-<chunk>
3. End
The attacker sends an aposBigUpload[type]=end request.
bigUploadEnd() begins processing the upload and creates temporary files before invoking the downstream import handler.
Only after this processing completes does execution reach the later authentication check in import().
4. Cleanup amplification
The attacker-controlled chunks value is also used by bigUploadCleanupOne():
for (const { chunks } of Object.values(bigUpload.files)) {
for (let i = 0; (i < chunks); i++) {
await ufs.remove(...);
}
}
No small upper bound on the declared chunk count appears to be enforced at upload initialization.
This allows an unauthenticated attacker to increase the number of filesystem cleanup operations performed for an upload.
Proof of Concept
The following reproduction was performed only against an isolated test environment.
Start an upload without authentication
curl -s -X POST \
'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/page/importExportImport?aposBigUpload[type]=start' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '{"files":{"file":{"name":"evil.tar.gz","size":4,"type":"application/gzip","chunks":1}}}'
The server returns an upload ID despite the request having no authenticated session.
Upload a chunk
printf 'PWN!' >/tmp/chunk.bin
curl -s -X POST \
'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/page/importExportImport?aposBigUpload[type]=chunk&aposBigUpload[id]=<ID>&aposBigUpload[n]=0&aposBigUpload[chunk]=0' \
-F 'chunk=@/tmp/chunk.bin;type=application/octet-stream'
The request succeeds and causes server-side upload storage to be used.
Finalize the upload
curl -i -X POST \
'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/page/importExportImport?aposBigUpload[type]=end&aposBigUpload[id]=<ID>'
Observed behavior:
startreturns HTTP 200 and an upload ID without authentication.chunkreturns HTTP 200 and results in server-side chunk storage.endeventually reaches the downstream authentication check and is rejected.- However, the server-side big-upload processing has already occurred before that authentication rejection.
In my isolated harness:
chunks=1resulted in one cleanup removal attempt.chunks=50resulted in 50 cleanup removal attempts.
This demonstrates that the attacker-controlled chunk count directly influences server-side cleanup work.
Security Impact
The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause server-side storage and filesystem operations that should only be reachable by authorized import users.
Possible consequences include:
- Consumption of upload and temporary storage.
- Creation of server-side upload state by unauthenticated users.
- Repeated filesystem I/O.
- Cleanup amplification based on attacker-controlled chunk counts.
- Potential service degradation or denial of service when the attack is repeated or sufficiently amplified.
Root Cause
Authentication is enforced in the downstream import handler rather than before the chunked-upload middleware.
The middleware itself already supports an authorize callback specifically for preventing unauthorized use of the big-upload functionality.
Suggested Remediation
Require authentication before any aposBigUpload operation is processed.
For example:
- Pass an appropriate
authorizecallback tobigUploadMiddleware()on all import routes. - Reject unauthenticated users before
start,chunk, orend. - Enforce reasonable limits on declared chunk counts.
- Validate declared size against actual uploaded data.
- Introduce per-user and global storage/rate limits.
- Ensure temporary files are removed when downstream processing fails.
- Add regression tests confirming that anonymous
start,chunk, andendrequests are rejected before upload state or files are created.
Relevant reviewed commit:
d3ff8c9bb001be1acf7fdc3f035190250ac64b45
Researcher Credit
Kai Zhi
GitHub:
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | apostrophe | all versions | 4.33.0npm install apostrophe@4.33.0 |
| 📦npm | @apostrophecms/import-export | all versions | 3.7.0npm install @apostrophecms/import-export@3.7.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for apostrophe, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update apostrophe to 4.33.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-86wm-68pq-5jwq is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-86wm-68pq-5jwq in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.