Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘 Packagist

GHSA-84px-q68r-2fc9

HIGH

Privilege escalation in the Sulu Admin panel

Also known asCVE-2021-43835
Published
Dec 15, 2021
Updated
Mar 13, 2026
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.1%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk62th percentile+0.81%
0.00%0.54%1.09%1.63%0.3%1.1%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

3 pkgs affected
🐘sulu/sulu🐘sulu/sulu🐘sulu/sulu

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

Impacted are only users which already have access to the admin UI. Over the API it was possible for them to give themselves permissions to areas which they did not already had. This issue was introduced in 2.0.0-RC1 with the new ProfileController putAction.

Patches

The versions have been patched in 2.2.18, 2.3.8 and 2.4.0.

Workarounds

Patching the ProfileController of affected sulu versions yourself by overwriting it.

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

Currently not.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistsulu/sulu2.0.0&&< 2.2.182.2.18
🐘Packagistsulu/sulu2.3.0&&< 2.3.82.3.8
🐘Packagistsulu/sulu2.4.0-RC1&&< 2.4.02.4.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for sulu/sulu. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update sulu/sulu to 2.2.18 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-84px-q68r-2fc9 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-84px-q68r-2fc9 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-84px-q68r-2fc9. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Impacted are only users which already have access to the admin UI. Over the API it was possible for them to give themselves permissions to areas which they did not already had. This issue was introduced in 2.0.0-RC1 with the new ProfileController putAction. ### Patches The versions have been patched in 2.2.18, 2.3.8 and 2.4.0. ### Workarounds Patching the ProfileController of affected sulu versions yourself by overwriting it. ### References _Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_ Currently not. ### For more information If you have any questions or comments
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-84px-q68r-2fc9 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-84px-q68r-2fc9 across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.