Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

GHSA-8398-gmmx-564h n8n

CRITICALFix: n8n-io/n8n@8607d37

GHSA-8398-gmmx-564h is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.9) CWE-693 vulnerability in n8n. A fix is available for n8n — see the affected versions and patch details below.

n8n has a Python sandbox escape

Also known asCVE-2026-25115
Published
Feb 4, 2026
Updated
Mar 25, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-8398-gmmx-564h.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs44th percentile — riskier than 44% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-8398-gmmx-564h plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,333 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

37other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
n8nnpm
69Kdownloads / week

Description

Impact

A vulnerability in the Python Code node allows authenticated users to break out of the Python sandbox environment and execute code outside the intended security boundary.

Only authenticated users are able to execute code through Task Runners.

This issue affected any deployment in which the following conditions were met:

  • Task Runners were enabled using N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED=true (default: false)
  • Python was enabled N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED=true
  • Code Node was enabled (default: true)

In case the N8N_RUNNERS_MODE is set to external (default: internal) the sandbox escape is limited to the sidecar container with lower risk for lateral movement. In that case a lower high severity is more appropriate.

Patches

This vulnerability is fixed in version 2.4.8 and later.

Workarounds

If an immediate upgrade cannot be applied, the following hardening steps are recommended:

  • Disable the Code Node by adding n8n-nodes-base.code to the NODES_EXCLUDE environment variable
  • Prefer external mode for isolation: run Task Runners in external mode so that untrusted task code executes in a separate sidecar container rather than within the main n8n process. This configuration significantly reduces the risk of in-process memory disclosure caused by unsafe buffer allocations.In external mode, a launcher manages Task Runner processes in a dedicated sidecar environment, separate from the primary n8n instance. See the [n8n documentation](https://docs.n8n.io/hosting/configuration/task-runners/) for configuration details and required environment variables.

Resources

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmn8nall versions2.4.8npm install n8n@2.4.8

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for n8n, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update n8n to 2.4.8 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-8398-gmmx-564h is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-8398-gmmx-564h can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-8398-gmmx-564h. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Impact A vulnerability in the Python Code node allows authenticated users to break out of the Python sandbox environment and execute code outside the intended security boundary. Only authenticated users are able to execute code through Task Runners. This issue affected any deployment in which the following conditions were met: - Task Runners were enabled using `N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED=true` (default: false) - Python was enabled `N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED=true` - Code Node was enabled (default: true) In case the `N8N_RUNNERS_MODE` is set to `external` (default: `internal`) the sandbox escape is l
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-8398-gmmx-564h in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-8398-gmmx-564h across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-8398-gmmx-564h: n8n (Critical 9.9) | O3 Security