GHSA-836r-79rf-4m37
HIGHGHSA-836r-79rf-4m37 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in soupsieve. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-836r-79rf-4m37 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Soup Sieve: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via Selector Parser
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-836r-79rf-4m37.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-836r-79rf-4m37 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 366,357 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
soupsieveReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The CSS selector parser in soupsieve (the CSS selector engine for Beautiful Soup 4) contains a regular expression vulnerable to catastrophic backtracking. When processing an attribute selector with an unterminated quoted value, the VALUE regex pattern in css_parser.py enters exponential backtracking. A payload of only 300 bytes causes the regex engine to hang for over 3 seconds, enabling a trivial Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) attack.
To be completely transparent, AI tools helped surface this issue. However, this was independently reproduced and carefully validated.
Any application that passes untrusted CSS selector strings to soupsieve.compile() or Beautiful Soup's .select() / .select_one() is affected.
Details
Affected code: soupsieve/css_parser.py, line ~121 - RE_VALUES / VALUE regex pattern
The soupsieve CSS parser uses a compiled regular expression to tokenise attribute selector values. This pattern matches both quoted strings ("value" or 'value') and unquoted identifiers. The regex contains alternation branches for:
- Double-quoted strings:
"[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*" - Single-quoted strings:
'[^'\\]*(?:\\.[^'\\]*)*' - Unquoted identifiers
When an attribute selector contains an unterminated quoted value - e.g., [a="xxxx... (opening " but no closing ") -” the regex engine attempts to match the quoted-string branch. After that branch fails (no closing quote), the engine backtracks and attempts to match the remaining input against subsequent alternation branches and parent patterns. The structure of the pattern causes catastrophic backtracking where the number of backtracking steps grows exponentially with the length of the content between the opening quote and the end of the string.
Root cause: The regex pattern does not anchor or guard against the case where a quoted string is never terminated. The overlapping character classes across alternation branches create exponential backtracking when the quoted-string branch fails on long input.
Key characteristics:
- Input size: Only 300 bytes are needed to trigger a >3 second hang
- Amplification: Each additional character approximately doubles the backtracking time
- No memory impact: The attack consumes CPU only (regex backtracking is compute-bound)
Proof of Concept
import time
import soupsieve as sv
PAYLOAD_LEN = 300
# Control: well-formed selector with terminated quote (completes instantly)
well_formed = '[a="' + ('x' * PAYLOAD_LEN) + '"]'
start = time.perf_counter()
try:
sv.compile(well_formed)
except Exception:
pass
control_time = time.perf_counter() - start
print(f"Well-formed selector ({len(well_formed)} bytes): {control_time:.4f}s")
# Exploit: unterminated quote triggers catastrophic regex backtracking
malformed = '[a="' + ('x' * PAYLOAD_LEN)
start = time.perf_counter()
try:
sv.compile(malformed) # WARNING: This will hang for >3 seconds
except Exception:
pass
exploit_time = time.perf_counter() - start
print(f"Malformed selector ({len(malformed)} bytes): {exploit_time:.4f}s")
slowdown = exploit_time / max(control_time, 1e-9)
print(f"Slowdown: {slowdown:.0f}x")
# Expected output:
# Well-formed selector (306 bytes): ~0.001s
# Malformed selector (304 bytes): >3.0s (may need to be killed)
# Slowdown: >3000x
#
# NOTE: On some systems the malformed selector may hang indefinitely.
# Use a timeout mechanism (signal.alarm, threading.Timer) when testing.
Safe testing variant with timeout:
import signal
import soupsieve as sv
def timeout_handler(signum, frame):
raise TimeoutError("ReDoS confirmed: regex backtracking exceeded timeout")
PAYLOAD_LEN = 300
malformed = '[a="' + ('x' * PAYLOAD_LEN)
signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, timeout_handler)
signal.alarm(3) # 3-second timeout
try:
sv.compile(malformed)
print("Selector compiled (not vulnerable)")
except TimeoutError as e:
print(f"VULNERABLE: {e}")
except Exception as e:
print(f"Other error: {e}")
finally:
signal.alarm(0) # Cancel the alarm
Impact
Severity: High
An attacker can cause CPU exhaustion on any server-side Python application that compiles user-supplied CSS selectors via soupsieve. The attack is particularly dangerous because:
- Tiny payload: Only 300 bytes are needed - well within typical URL parameter, form field, or API request limits
- No special characters: The payload consists entirely of printable ASCII characters (
[a="xxx...) - Exponential scaling: Each additional byte approximately doubles the backtracking time, making the attack easily tuneable
- Thread blocking: The regex engine blocks the calling thread with no opportunity for interruption (except via OS signals)
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Input size | 300 bytes |
| CPU time consumed | >3 seconds (exponential with payload length) |
| Memory consumed | Negligible (CPU-only attack) |
| Authentication required | None |
| User interaction required | None |
Deployment impact: In threaded or async web applications, a single malicious request blocks a worker thread for the duration of the backtracking. An attacker can submit multiple concurrent requests to exhaust all available workers, causing complete service denial. The small payload size makes the attack easy to deliver and difficult to detect via request size limits.
Downstream exposure: soupsieve is an automatic dependency of beautifulsoup4, one of the most widely installed Python packages. Any web application, API, or service that accepts CSS selectors from users is potentially affected.
Credit
The vulnerability was discovered by a security research team from the University of Sydney, whose focus is detecting open source software vulnerabilities. Liyi Zhou: https://lzhou1110.github.io/ Ziyue Wang: https://zyy0530.github.io/ Strick: https://str1ckl4nd.github.io/ Maurice: https://maurice.busystar.org/ Chenchen Yu: https://7thparkk.github.io/
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | soupsieve | all versions | 2.8.4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for soupsieve. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update soupsieve to 2.8.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-836r-79rf-4m37 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-836r-79rf-4m37 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-836r-79rf-4m37. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Important: A regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) flaw in the soupsieve library can lead to CPU exhaustion. A remote attacker can exploit this by supplying a small, specially crafted CSS selector string to applications that process untrusted CSS, potentially blocking worker threads and causing a complete…
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-836r-79rf-4m37 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-836r-79rf-4m37 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.