GHSA-828c-5j5q-vrjq
MEDIUMTensorFlow vulnerable to null-dereference in `mlir::tfg::GraphDefImporter::ConvertNodeDef`
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-gpu🐍tensorflow-gpu+1 moreReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
When mlir::tfg::GraphDefImporter::ConvertNodeDef tries to convert NodeDefs without an op name, it crashes.
Status GraphDefImporter::ConvertNodeDef(OpBuilder &builder, ConversionState &s,
const NodeDef &node) {
VLOG(4) << "Importing: " << node.name();
OperationState state(ConvertLocation(node), absl::StrCat("tfg.", node.op()));
// The GraphImporter does light shape inference, but here we will defer all of
// that to the shape inference pass.
const OpDef *op_def;
const OpRegistrationData *op_reg_data = nullptr;
if ((op_reg_data = registry_.LookUp(node.op()))) {
op_def = &op_reg_data->op_def;
} else {
auto it = function_op_defs_.find(node.op());
if (it == function_op_defs_.end())
return InvalidArgument("Unable to find OpDef for ", node.op());
op_def = it->second;
}
node.op().empty() cannot be empty.
Patches
We have patched the issue in GitHub commit a0f0b9a21c9270930457095092f558fbad4c03e5.
The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.10.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.9.1, TensorFlow 2.8.1, and TensorFlow 2.7.2, as these are also affected and still in supported range.
For more information
Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | all versions | 2.7.2 |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | ≥ 2.8.0&&< 2.8.1 | 2.8.1 |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | ≥ 2.9.0&&< 2.9.1 | 2.9.1 |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow-cpu | all versions | 2.7.2 |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow-cpu | ≥ 2.8.0&&< 2.8.1 | 2.8.1 |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow-cpu | ≥ 2.9.0&&< 2.9.1 | 2.9.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tensorflow. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update tensorflow to 2.7.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-828c-5j5q-vrjq is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-828c-5j5q-vrjq is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-828c-5j5q-vrjq. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-828c-5j5q-vrjq in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-828c-5j5q-vrjq across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.