NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

Cross-Site Request Forgery in JupyterHubGHSA-7xx3-qp5w-fw96

MEDIUM

GHSA-7xx3-qp5w-fw96 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.5) Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in jupyterhub. 1 public exploit or proof-of-concept reference is indexed, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for jupyterhub — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asBIT-jupyterhub-2020-36191CVE-2020-36191PYSEC-2021-67
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Nov 9, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs44th percentile — riskier than 44% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.34%0.67%1.01%0.1%0.5%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍jupyterhub

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

JupyterHub 1.1.0 allows CSRF in the admin panel via a request that lacks an _xsrf field, as demonstrated by a /hub/api/user request (to add or remove a user account).

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIjupyterhuball versions1.2.0b1pip install --upgrade 'jupyterhub==1.2.0b1'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
jupyterhubjupyter
1 version
1.1.0
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

JupyterHub 1.1.0 allows CSRF in the admin panel via a request that lacks…

github.comNVDJan 2021

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for jupyterhub, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update jupyterhub to 1.2.0b1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-7xx3-qp5w-fw96 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

JupyterHub 1.1.0 allows CSRF in the admin panel via a request that lacks an `_xsrf` field, as demonstrated by a /hub/api/user request (to add or remove a user account).
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-7xx3-qp5w-fw96 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works
Cross-Site Request Forgery in JupyterHub (Medium 4.5)