Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀 crates.io

GHSA-7v42-g35v-xrch

HIGH

Improper Digest Verification in httpsig-hyper May Allow Message Integrity Bypass

Also known asCVE-2026-26275
Published
Feb 17, 2026
Updated
Feb 20, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk6th percentile+0.14%
0.00%0.22%0.44%0.66%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.2%Mar 26May 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🦀httpsig-hyper

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

An issue was discovered in httpsig-hyper where Digest header verification could incorrectly succeed due to misuse of Rust's matches! macro. Specifically, the comparison:

if matches!(digest, _expected_digest)

treated _expected_digest as a pattern binding rather than a value comparison, resulting in unconditional success of the match expression.

As a consequence, digest verification could incorrectly return success even when the computed digest did not match the expected value.

Applications relying on Digest verification as part of HTTP message signature validation may therefore fail to detect message body modification. The severity depends on how the library is integrated and whether additional signature validation layers are enforced.


Patches

This issue has been fixed in:

  • httpsig-hyper >= 0.0.23

The fix replaces the incorrect matches! usage with proper value comparison and additionally introduces constant-time comparison for digest verification as defense-in-depth.

Regression tests have also been added to prevent reintroduction of this issue. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to the patched version.


Workarounds

There is no reliable workaround without upgrading. Users who cannot immediately upgrade should avoid relying solely on Digest verification for message integrity and ensure that full HTTP message signature verification is enforced at the application layer.


References

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.iohttpsig-hyperall versions0.0.23

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for httpsig-hyper. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update httpsig-hyper to 0.0.23 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-7v42-g35v-xrch is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-7v42-g35v-xrch is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-7v42-g35v-xrch. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact An issue was discovered in `httpsig-hyper` where Digest header verification could incorrectly succeed due to misuse of Rust's `matches!` macro. Specifically, the comparison: ```rust if matches!(digest, _expected_digest) ``` treated `_expected_digest` as a pattern binding rather than a value comparison, resulting in unconditional success of the match expression. As a consequence, digest verification could incorrectly return success even when the computed digest did not match the expected value. Applications relying on Digest verification as part of HTTP message signature validat
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-7v42-g35v-xrch in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-7v42-g35v-xrch across crates.io dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.