Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀
🦀 crates.io
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-7rrj-xr53-82p7 — tokio

MEDIUMFix: tokio-rs/tokio#5336

GHSA-7rrj-xr53-82p7 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.4) CWE-665 vulnerability in tokio. A fix is available for tokio — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Tokio reject_remote_clients configuration may get dropped when creating a Windows named pipe

Also known asCVE-2023-22466RUSTSEC-2023-0001
Published
Jan 6, 2023
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-7rrj-xr53-82p7.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs46th percentile — riskier than 46% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-7rrj-xr53-82p7 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 378,567 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

3 pkgs affected
🦀tokio🦀tokio🦀tokio

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

When configuring a Windows named pipe server, setting pipe_mode will reset reject_remote_clients to false. If the application has previously configured reject_remote_clients to true, this effectively undoes the configuration. This also applies if reject_remote_clients is not explicitly set as this is the default configuration and is cleared by calling pipe_mode.

Remote clients may only access the named pipe if the named pipe's associated path is accessible via a publically shared folder (SMB).

Patches

The following versions have been patched:

  • 1.23.1
  • 1.20.3
  • 1.18.4

The fix will also be present in all releases starting from version 1.24.0.

Named pipes were introduced to Tokio in version 1.7.0, so releases older than 1.7.0 are not affected.

Workarounds

Ensure that pipe_mode is set first after initializing a ServerOptions. For example:

let mut opts = ServerOptions::new();
opts.pipe_mode(PipeMode::Message);
opts.reject_remote_clients(true);

References

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winbase/nf-winbase-createnamedpipea#pipe_reject_remote_clients

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.iotokio≥ 1.7.0&&< 1.18.41.18.4cargo update -p tokio --precise 1.18.4
🦀crates.iotokio≥ 1.19.0&&< 1.20.31.20.3cargo update -p tokio --precise 1.20.3
🦀crates.iotokio≥ 1.21.0&&< 1.23.11.23.1cargo update -p tokio --precise 1.23.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tokio, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update tokio to 1.18.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-7rrj-xr53-82p7 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-7rrj-xr53-82p7 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-7rrj-xr53-82p7. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact When configuring a Windows named pipe server, setting `pipe_mode` will reset `reject_remote_clients` to `false`. If the application has previously configured `reject_remote_clients` to `true`, this effectively undoes the configuration. This also applies if `reject_remote_clients` is not explicitly set as this is the default configuration and is cleared by calling `pipe_mode`. Remote clients may only access the named pipe if the named pipe's associated path is accessible via a publically shared folder (SMB). ### Patches The following versions have been patched: * 1.23.1 * 1.20.3
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-7rrj-xr53-82p7 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-7rrj-xr53-82p7 across crates.io dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-7rrj-xr53-82p7: tokio (Medium 5.4) | O3 Security