GHSA-7rjh-px4v-5w55
MEDIUMGHSA-7rjh-px4v-5w55 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.4) vulnerability in open-webui. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-7rjh-px4v-5w55 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Open WebUI's Channel Access Grants Bypass filter_allowed_access_grants
Real-World Exposure
open-webuiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Channel Access Grants Bypass filter_allowed_access_grants
Affected Component
Channel creation and update endpoints:
backend/open_webui/routers/channels.py(lines 291-340,create_new_channel)backend/open_webui/routers/channels.py(lines 617-638,update_channel_by_id)backend/open_webui/models/channels.py(lines 825-826,set_access_grantscall without filtering)
Affected Versions
Current main branch (commit 6fdd19bf1) and likely all versions supporting user-created group channels with access grants.
Description
All resource routers in Open WebUI (knowledge, models, notes, prompts, tools, skills) call filter_allowed_access_grants() before persisting access grants. This function strips principal_id: "*" wildcard grants from users who lack the relevant sharing.public_* permission, and strips individual user grants from users who lack access_grants.allow_users permission.
The channel router does not call filter_allowed_access_grants on either create or update paths. A non-admin user who can create group channels (or who owns a channel) can submit arbitrary access grants — including public wildcard grants — and those grants are stored verbatim, bypassing the admin's permission framework.
# channels.py — access_grants from form data flow directly into persistence
# No call to filter_allowed_access_grants() anywhere in these paths.
# Compare with knowledge.py / models.py / notes.py / prompts.py / tools.py / skills.py,
# all of which do:
# form_data.access_grants = filter_allowed_access_grants(user, form_data.access_grants)
# before creating or updating.
Attack Scenario
- Admin configures permissions so that regular users do NOT have
sharing.public_channels— public sharing of channels is intended to be admin-only. - Attacker (a regular user) creates or owns a group channel.
- Attacker sends:
POST /api/v1/channels/ { "name": "public-channel", "type": "group", "access_control": { "access_grants": [ {"principal_type": "user", "principal_id": "*", "permission": "read"} ] } } set_access_grantsis called directly withoutfilter_allowed_access_grants— the wildcard grant is persisted.- The channel becomes publicly readable to every user on the instance, despite the admin's policy prohibiting public channels for regular users.
The same attack works via POST /api/v1/channels/{id}/update for any channel the attacker owns.
Impact
- Regular users can bypass the
sharing.public_channelspermission and make channels publicly accessible - Regular users can bypass
access_grants.allow_usersto grant individual-user access in environments where only group-based sharing is intended - Admin's permission framework for channels is silently ineffective
- Creates an inconsistency with every other resource type in the codebase, making the security posture harder to reason about
Preconditions
- Attacker must have an account with the ability to create group channels (default user capability), or ownership of an existing channel
- Admin must have configured restrictive sharing permissions for regular users (otherwise there's no policy to bypass)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | open-webui | all versions | 0.9.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for open-webui. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update open-webui to 0.9.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-7rjh-px4v-5w55 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-7rjh-px4v-5w55 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-7rjh-px4v-5w55. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-7rjh-px4v-5w55 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-7rjh-px4v-5w55 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.