GHSA-7pgq-cr25-xvc8 — getgrav/grav
HIGHGHSA-7pgq-cr25-xvc8 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) Code Injection vulnerability in getgrav/grav. A fix is available for getgrav/grav — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Grav: Incomplete callable validation in blueprint dynamic fields allows arbitrary static method invocation and file disclosure
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-7pgq-cr25-xvc8.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-7pgq-cr25-xvc8 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 374,847 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
getgrav/gravReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Grav CMS's blueprint dynamic-field callable guard can be bypassed with a fully-qualified Class::method string, letting an account with only page-editing rights (admin.pages, not super-admin) plant a directive in a page's form-field frontmatter that invokes an arbitrary public static PHP method with attacker-controlled arguments. Using built-in gadget methods this yields, at minimum, arbitrary reading of any server-readable file (disclosed to anonymous visitors of the crafted page) and arbitrary creation/copying of files and directories under the web-server account.
Details
Blueprint::isSafeDynamicCall() (system/src/Grav/Common/Data/Blueprint.php, method around line 488) is meant to block dangerous callables named in a blueprint's dynamic-field directives (data-*@). It only consults its dangerous-name denylist when the callable string does not contain :::
if (is_string($function) && !str_contains($function, '::') && Utils::isDangerousFunction($function)) {
return false;
}
Any callable string containing :: — i.e. every Class::method static call — skips the check entirely and is passed to call_user_func_array() at Blueprint::dynamicData() (Blueprint.php, around line 461) and FlexDirectory::dynamicDataField() (system/src/Grav/Framework/Flex/FlexDirectory.php, around line 937). There is no allowlist restricting which classes or methods may be invoked this way; only the call's arguments are (separately) scanned for smuggled dangerous callables, never the target itself.
Utils::isDangerousFunction() (system/src/Grav/Common/Utils.php) classifies any string containing a colon (str_contains($name, ":")) or a namespace backslash as dangerous — so a qualified Class::method string would be rejected if it ever reached this function. The !str_contains($function, '::') condition in isSafeDynamicCall() ensures it never does, which is what leaves qualified static calls entirely unscreened. (Whether the exemption was intended to admit legitimate Class::method option-providers is a plausible reading of the surrounding code, but the intent is not established here.)
This is an incomplete fix of two recently published advisories — one addressing page editors executing hidden callables via form-field settings, the other extending the same guard to Flex directories. The guard those fixes introduced never covered qualified static calls. Grav's own permission model separates page-content code execution into a distinct, higher privilege (admin.pages_twig) from plain page editing (admin.pages), so invoking arbitrary methods from an admin.pages-authored page is a genuine trust-boundary bypass, not editor capability by design.
PoC
Tested on Grav develop at commit db8c1fc (which self-reports version 2.0.11) with the admin and form plugins, using an account granted only admin.login + admin.pages (page editor, not super-admin). The same guard is present in every current release from 2.0.7 through 2.0.10. Base URL shown as https://grav.example.
A. Arbitrary file read (confidentiality)
- Log in to
/adminas the page-editor account (GET/adminfor the login nonce, then POSTtask=login). - Save a page via the standard admin endpoint,
POST /admin/pages/<route>with the session cookie, the admin nonce, anddata[frontmatter]containing a form field with adownloadgadget directive:
The server returnsforms: x: fields: y: type: text data-opts@: - 'Grav\Common\Utils::download' - '/etc/passwd' - false - 0 - 1024 - mime: 'text/plain'HTTP 200and accepts the save — thedata-opts@directive is not rejected. - As an unauthenticated visitor (no cookies), request the saved page, e.g.
GET /<route>(use a fresh query string to avoid a cached copy; immediately after saving, a first request may404while the flat-file page index catches up — retry moments later). The response isHTTP 200with the raw contents of/etc/passwdin the body (root:x:0:0:...). Pointing the path atuser/accounts/<name>.yamlinstead returns that account file, including itshashed_password:bcrypt line — i.e. an anonymous visitor obtains a stored administrator's password hash.
B. Arbitrary file/directory write (integrity) — verified
Using the same mechanism with Grav\Common\Filesystem\Folder::copy (a public static method taking source and destination paths), a page editor caused the server to copy an existing page directory to an attacker-chosen new path under user/pages/; the newly created page then rendered its (attacker-controlled) content at the new route over plain HTTP. This demonstrates attacker-controlled creation of files/directories anywhere the web-server account can write. Folder::move and Folder::delete are equally reachable (their destructive nature was not exercised).
Impact
A page editor (an admin.pages-only account, not super-admin) can, through a page they author:
- Read any server-readable file, disclosed to any anonymous, unauthenticated visitor of the crafted page — including
user/accounts/*.yaml, which stores account metadata and bcrypt password hashes. An attacker may attempt offline cracking of a disclosed hash; recovery of a weak or reused administrator password could lead to full admin-panel compromise. Other secrets on disk (site/plugin config, environment files) are equally exposed. - Create or overwrite files and directories under the web-server account (demonstrated via
Folder::copy), withFolder::move/Folder::deleteadditionally reachable for destructive tampering.
Because the guard permits any public static method, the reachable impact is bounded only by the gadget surface of the loaded codebase, not by this report's demonstrated cases.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | getgrav/grav | ≥ 2.0.7&&< 2.0.11 | 2.0.11composer require getgrav/grav:^2.0.11 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for getgrav/grav, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update getgrav/grav to 2.0.11 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-7pgq-cr25-xvc8 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-7pgq-cr25-xvc8 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-7pgq-cr25-xvc8. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-7pgq-cr25-xvc8 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-7pgq-cr25-xvc8 across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.