Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm

GHSA-7mc2-6phr-23xc

tiny-secp256k1 vulnerable to private key extraction when signing a malicious JSON-stringifyable message in bundled environment

Also known asCVE-2024-49364
Published
Jun 30, 2025
Updated
Jul 1, 2025
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk23th percentile-0.01%
0.00%0.27%0.55%0.82%0.0%0.3%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
📦tiny-secp256k1

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects npm packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Private key can be extracted on signing a malicious JSON-stringifiable object, when global Buffer is buffer package

Details

This affects only environments where require('buffer') is https://npmjs.com/buffer E.g.: browser bundles, React Native apps, etc.

Buffer.isBuffer check can be bypassed, resulting in k reuse for different messages, leading to private key extraction over a single invalid message (and a second one for which any message/signature could be taken, e.g. previously known valid one)

v2.x is unaffected as it verifies input to be an actual Uint8Array instance

Such a message can be constructed for any already known message/signature pair, meaning that the attack needs only a single malicious message being signed for a full key extraction

While signing unverified attacker-controlled messages would be problematic itself (and exploitation of this needs such a scenario), signing a single message still should not leak the private key

Also, message validation could have the same bug (out of scope for this report, but could be possible in some situations), which makes this attack more likely when used in a chain

https://github.com/bitcoinjs/tiny-secp256k1/pull/140 is a subtle fix for this

PoC

This code deliberately doesn't provide funnyBuffer and extractTiny for now, could be updated later

import secp256k1 from 'tiny-secp256k1'
import crypto from 'crypto'

const key = crypto.randomBytes(32)

const msg0 = crypto.randomBytes(32)
const sig0 = secp256k1.sign(msg0, key).toString('hex')

const msg1 = funnyBuffer(msg0)
const sig1 = secp256k1.sign(msg1, key).toString('hex')

const restored = extractTiny(msg0, sig0, sig1)
console.log('Guesses:', JSON.stringify(restored, undefined, 2))
const recheck = (k) => secp256k1.sign(msg0, Buffer.from(k, 'hex')).toString('hex') === sig0
console.log('Rechecked:', JSON.stringify(restored.filter(recheck)))

console.log('Actual key', key.toString('hex'))

Output:

Guesses: [
  "8f351953047e6b149e0595547e7d10a8a1edc61bd519b5b2514202a495e434ed",
  "ebc81e1632a1b3255589ba84364949a0a6fd0229444519765570706d394671dd"
]
Rechecked: ["ebc81e1632a1b3255589ba84364949a0a6fd0229444519765570706d394671dd"]
Actual key ebc81e1632a1b3255589ba84364949a0a6fd0229444519765570706d394671dd

Impact

Full private key extraction when signing a single malicious message (that passes JSON.stringify/JSON.parse and can come from network)

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmtiny-secp256k1all versions1.1.7

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tiny-secp256k1. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update tiny-secp256k1 to 1.1.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-7mc2-6phr-23xc is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-7mc2-6phr-23xc is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-7mc2-6phr-23xc. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Private key can be extracted on signing a malicious JSON-stringifiable object, when global Buffer is [`buffer` package](https://www.npmjs.com/package/buffer) ### Details This affects only environments where `require('buffer')` is <https://npmjs.com/buffer> E.g.: browser bundles, React Native apps, etc. `Buffer.isBuffer` check can be bypassed, resulting in `k` reuse for different messages, leading to private key extraction over a single invalid message (and a second one for which any message/signature could be taken, e.g. previously known valid one) v2.x is unaffected as it ver
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-7mc2-6phr-23xc in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-7mc2-6phr-23xc across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.