How severe is GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p?

GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p has a CVSS score of 9.8/10, rated CRITICAL. Immediate patching is strongly recommended.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p?

GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p affects the following packages: propel/propel1 (Packagist). Ecosystems affected: Packagist.

How do I fix GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p?

Update propel/propel1 to 1.7.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p in my Packagist dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for propel/propel1, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

How do I mitigate GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

How does O3 Security protect against GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p?

O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Is GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

When was GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p was published on May 20, 2024 and was last updated on December 5, 2024. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

🐘

🐘 Packagist

Not in CISA KEV

CRITICAL severity

GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p — propel/propel1

CRITICALFix: propelorm/Propel#1054

GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) remote code execution vulnerability in propel/propel1. A fix is available for propel/propel1 — see the affected versions and patch details below.

propel/propel1 SQL injection possible with limit() on MySQL

Published

May 20, 2024

Updated

Dec 5, 2024

Affected

1 pkg

Patched

1 / 1

Exploits

None indexed

Exploitation data as of Dec 5, 2024 · OSV.dev, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

🐘propel/propel1

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

The limit() query method is susceptible to catastrophic SQL injection with MySQL.

For example, given a model User for a table users:

UserQuery::create()->limit('1;DROP TABLE users')->find();

This will drop the users table!

The cause appears to be a lack of integer casting of the limit input in either Criteria::setLimit() or in DBMySQL::applyLimit(). The code comments there seem to imply that casting was avoided due to overflow issues with 32-bit integers.

This is surprising behavior since one of the primary purposes of an ORM is to prevent basic SQL injection.

This affects all versions of Propel: 1.x, 2.x, and 3.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
🐘Packagist	`propel/propel1`	≥ 1&&< 1.7.2	1.7.2`composer require propel/propel1:^1.7.2`

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for propel/propel1, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update propel/propel1 to 1.7.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

The limit() query method is susceptible to catastrophic SQL injection with MySQL. For example, given a model User for a table users: ``` UserQuery::create()->limit('1;DROP TABLE users')->find(); ``` This will drop the users table! The cause appears to be a lack of integer casting of the limit input in either Criteria::setLimit() or in DBMySQL::applyLimit(). The code comments there seem to imply that casting was avoided due to overflow issues with 32-bit integers. This is surprising behavior since one of the primary purposes of an ORM is to prevent basic SQL injection. This affects all vers

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works