Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-793v-589g-574v

Bokeh server applications have Incomplete Origin Validation in WebSockets

Also known asCVE-2026-21883
Published
Jan 6, 2026
Updated
Feb 4, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk5th percentile+0.15%
0.00%0.22%0.44%0.66%0.0%0.2%Feb 26May 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍bokeh

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

This vulnerability allows for Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH) of a deployed Bokeh server instance.

Scope

This vulnerability is only relevant to deployed Bokeh server instances. There is no impact on static HTML output, standalone embedded plots, or Jupyter notebook usage.

This vulnerability does not prevent any requirements for up-front authentication on Bokeh servers that have authentication hooks in place, and cannot be used to make Bokeh servers deployed on private, internal networks accessible outside those networks.

Impact

If a Bokeh server is configured with an allowlist (e.g., dashboard.corp), an attacker can register a domain like dashboard.corp.attacker.com (or use a subdomain if applicable) and lure a victim to visit it. The malicious site can then initiate a WebSocket connection to the vulnerable Bokeh server. Since the Origin header (e.g., http://dashboard.corp.attacker.com/) matches the allowlist according to the flawed logic, the connection is accepted.

Once connected, the attacker can interact with the Bokeh server on behalf of the victim, potentially accessing sensitive data, or modifying visualizations.

Patches

Patched in versions 3.8.2 and later.

Workarounds

None

Technical description

The match_host function in src/bokeh/server/util.py contains a flaw in how it compares hostnames against the allowlist patterns. The function uses Python's zip() function to iterate over the parts of the hostname and the pattern simultaneously. However, zip() stops iteration when the shortest iterable is exhausted.

Because the code only checks if the pattern is longer than the host (lines 232-233), but fails to check if the host is longer than the pattern, a host that starts with the pattern (but has additional segments) will successfully match.

For example, if the allowlist is configured to ['[example.com](http://example.com/)'], the function will incorrectly validate [example.com.bad.com](http://example.com.evil.com/) as a match:

  1. host parts: ['example', 'com', 'bad', 'com']
  2. pattern parts: ['example', 'com']
  3. zip compares example==example (OK) and com==com (OK).
  4. Iteration stops, and the function returns True.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIbokehall versions3.8.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for bokeh. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update bokeh to 3.8.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-793v-589g-574v is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-793v-589g-574v is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-793v-589g-574v. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

This vulnerability allows for **Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH)** of a deployed Bokeh server instance. ### Scope This vulnerability is only relevant to deployed Bokeh server instances. There is no impact on static HTML output, standalone embedded plots, or Jupyter notebook usage. This vulnerability does not prevent any requirements for up-front authentication on Bokeh servers that have authentication hooks in place, and cannot be used to make Bokeh servers deployed on private, internal networks accessible outside those networks. ### Impact If a Bokeh server is configured with an
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-793v-589g-574v in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-793v-589g-574v across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.