How severe is GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f?

No CVSS score has been assigned to GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f yet. Review the advisory details and affected package list to assess your exposure.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f?

GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f affects the following packages: aliyundrive-webdav (crates.io), aliyundrive-webdav (PyPI). Ecosystems affected: crates.io, PyPI.

How do I fix GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f?

The records we use list no patched version of aliyundrive-webdav for GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f. Check the maintainer's advisory, and where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range.

How do I detect GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f in my crates.io, PyPI dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for aliyundrive-webdav, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

How do I mitigate GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.

Is GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f?

GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 1.2%, placing it in the 68th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f?

GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f is classified as OS Command Injection (CWE-78). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation. This is a high-impact weakness class that often enables remote code execution or data exposure.

When was GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f was published on March 29, 2024 and was last updated on July 7, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

🦀 crates.io🐍 PyPI

Not in CISA KEV

aliyundrive-webdav vulnerable to Command InjectionGHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f

GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f is a OS Command Injection vulnerability in aliyundrive-webdav. The records list no fixed version yet; check the vendor advisory below and apply the mitigations in the meantime.

Also known asCVE-2024-29640PYSEC-2026-1114

Published

Mar 29, 2024

Updated

Jul 7, 2026

Affected

2 pkgs

Patched

None yet

Exploits

None indexed

Exploitation data as of Nov 5, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

1.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk0.00%

Lower risk than most CVEs68th percentile — riskier than 68% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

🦀aliyundrive-webdav🐍aliyundrive-webdav

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io, PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

An issue in aliyundrive-webdav v.2.3.3 and before allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted payload to the sid parameter in the action_query_qrcode component.

Affected Packages

2 total

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
🦀crates.io	`aliyundrive-webdav`	all versions	No fix
🐍PyPI	`aliyundrive-webdav`	all versions	No fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for aliyundrive-webdav, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Remediation status
The records we use list no patched version of aliyundrive-webdav for GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f. Check the maintainer's advisory, and where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range.
Mitigate without a patch
Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.

Frequently Asked Questions

An issue in aliyundrive-webdav v.2.3.3 and before allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted payload to the sid parameter in the `action_query_qrcode` component.

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-73v2-rxqp-7q4f in your dependencies?

Find it across crates.io, PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works