Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-6q9c-m9fr-865m

vet MCP Server SSE Transport DNS Rebinding Vulnerability

Also known asCVE-2025-59163GO-2025-3986
Published
Sep 29, 2025
Updated
Oct 23, 2025
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk30th percentile+0.21%
0.00%0.29%0.59%0.88%0.2%0.4%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/safedep/vet

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

SafeDep vet is vulnerable to a DNS rebinding attack due to lack of HTTP Host and Origin header validation.

To exploit this vulnerability following conditions must be met:

  1. A vet scan is executed and reports are saved as sqlite3 database
  2. A vet MCP server is running on default port with SSE transport that has access to the report database
  3. The attacker lures the victim to attacker controlled website
  4. Attacker leverages DNS rebinding to access vet SSE server on 127.0.0.1 through the website
  5. Attacker uses MCP tools to read information from report database

Impact

Data from vet scan sqlite3 database may be exposed to remote attackers when vet is used as an MCP server in SSE mode with default ports through the sqlite3 query MCP tool.

Patches

  • v1.12.5 is released that patches the issue with Host and Origin header allow list and validation

Workarounds

  • Use stdio (default) transport for SSE server

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/safedep/vetall versions1.12.5

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/safedep/vet. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/safedep/vet to 1.12.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-6q9c-m9fr-865m is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-6q9c-m9fr-865m is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-6q9c-m9fr-865m. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

SafeDep `vet` is vulnerable to a DNS rebinding attack due to lack of HTTP `Host` and `Origin` header validation. To exploit this vulnerability following conditions must be met: 1. A `vet` scan is executed and reports are saved as `sqlite3` database 2. A `vet` MCP server is running on default port with SSE transport that has access to the report database 3. The attacker lures the victim to attacker controlled website 4. Attacker leverages DNS rebinding to access `vet` SSE server on `127.0.0.1` through the website 5. Attacker uses MCP tools to read information from report database ### Impact
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-6q9c-m9fr-865m in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-6q9c-m9fr-865m across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.