Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀
🦀 crates.io
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-6hfq-h8hq-87mf

MEDIUMFix: hyperium/hyper@8f93123

GHSA-6hfq-h8hq-87mf is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.8) CWE-444 vulnerability in hyper. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-6hfq-h8hq-87mf is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

HTTP Request Smuggling in hyper

Also known asCVE-2021-21299RUSTSEC-2021-0020
Published
Aug 25, 2021
Updated
Jul 8, 2026
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Jul 8, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

3 pkgs affected
🦀hyper🦀hyper🦀hyper

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

hyper's HTTP server code had a flaw that incorrectly understands some requests with multiple transfer-encoding headers to have a chunked payload, when it should have been rejected as illegal. This combined with an upstream HTTP proxy that understands the request payload boundary differently can result in "request smuggling" or "desync attacks".

Vulnerability

The flaw was introduced in https://github.com/hyperium/hyper/commit/26417fc24a7d05df538e0f39239b373c5c3d61f6, released in v0.12.0.

Consider this example request:

POST /yolo HTTP/1.1
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Transfer-Encoding: cow

This request should be rejected, according to RFC 7230, since it has a Transfer-Encoding header, but after folding, it does not end in chunked. hyper would notice the chunked in the first line, and then check the second line, and thanks to a missing boolean assignment, not set the error condition. hyper would treat the payload as being chunked. By differing from the spec, it is possible to send requests like these to endpoints that have different HTTP implementations, with different interpretations of the payload semantics, and cause "desync attacks".

There are several parts of the spec that must also be checked, and hyper correctly handles all of those. Additionally, hyper's client does not allow sending requests with improper headers, so the misunderstanding cannot be propagated further.

Read more about desync attacks: https://portswigger.net/research/http-desync-attacks-request-smuggling-reborn

Impact

To determine if vulnerable, all these things must be true:

  • Using hyper as an HTTP server. The client is not affected.
  • Using HTTP/1.1. HTTP/2 does not use transfer-encoding.
  • Using a vulnerable HTTP proxy upstream to hyper. If an upstream proxy correctly rejects the illegal transfer-encoding headers, the desync attack cannot succeed. If there is no proxy upstream of hyper, hyper cannot start the desync attack, as the client will repair the headers before forwarding.

Patches

We have released and backported the following patch versions:

  • v0.14.3
  • v0.13.10

Workarounds

Besides upgrading hyper, you can take the following options:

  • Reject requests that contain a transfer-encoding header.
  • Ensure any upstream proxy handles transfer-encoding correctly.

Credits

This issue was initially reported by ZeddYu Lu From Qi An Xin Technology Research Institute.

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.iohyper0.14.0&&< 0.14.30.14.3
🦀crates.iohyper0.13.0&&< 0.13.100.13.10
🦀crates.iohyper0.12.0&&< 0.12.360.12.36

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for hyper. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update hyper to 0.14.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-6hfq-h8hq-87mf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-6hfq-h8hq-87mf is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-6hfq-h8hq-87mf. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary hyper's HTTP server code had a flaw that incorrectly understands some requests with multiple transfer-encoding headers to have a chunked payload, when it should have been rejected as illegal. This combined with an upstream HTTP proxy that understands the request payload boundary differently can result in "request smuggling" or "desync attacks". ### Vulnerability The flaw was introduced in https://github.com/hyperium/hyper/commit/26417fc24a7d05df538e0f39239b373c5c3d61f6, released in v0.12.0. Consider this example request: ``` POST /yolo HTTP/1.1 Transfer-Encoding: chunked Trans
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-6hfq-h8hq-87mf in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-6hfq-h8hq-87mf across crates.io dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.