How severe is GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8?

No CVSS score has been assigned to GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8 yet. Review the advisory details and affected package list to assess your exposure.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8?

GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8 affects the following packages: litellm (PyPI). Ecosystems affected: PyPI.

How do I fix GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8?

Update litellm to 1.83.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8 in my PyPI dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for litellm, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

How do I mitigate GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8 if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

How does O3 Security protect against GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8?

O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Is GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8 actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8 yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

When was GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8 published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8 was published on April 8, 2026 and was last updated on September 10, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

🐍 PyPI

Not in CISA KEV

GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8 — litellm

GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8 is a security vulnerability in litellm. A fix is available for litellm — see the affected versions and patch details below.

LiteLLM: Password hash exposure and pass-the-hash authentication bypass

Published

Apr 8, 2026

Updated

Sep 10, 2026

Affected

1 pkg

Patched

1 / 1

Exploits

None indexed

Exploitation data as of Sep 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

🐍litellm

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

Three issues combine into a full authentication bypass chain:

Weak hashing: User passwords are stored as unsalted SHA-256 hashes, making them vulnerable to rainbow table attacks and trivially identifying users with identical passwords.
Hash exposure: Multiple API endpoints (/user/info, /user/update, /spend/users) return the password hash field in responses to any authenticated user regardless of role. Plaintext passwords could also potentially be exposed in certain scenarios.
Pass-the-hash: The /v2/login endpoint accepts the raw SHA-256 hash as a valid password without re-hashing, allowing direct login with a stolen

An already authenticated user can retrieve another user's password hash from the API and use it to log in as that user. This enables full privilege escalation in three HTTP requests.

Patches

Fixed in v1.83.0. Passwords are now hashed with scrypt (random 16-byte salt, n=16384, r=8, p=1). Password hashes are stripped from all API responses. Existing SHA-256 hashes are transparently migrated on next login.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
🐍PyPI	`litellm`	all versions	1.83.0`pip install --upgrade 'litellm==1.83.0'`

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for litellm, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update litellm to 1.83.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Three issues combine into a full authentication bypass chain: 1. Weak hashing: User passwords are stored as unsalted SHA-256 hashes, making them vulnerable to rainbow table attacks and trivially identifying users with identical passwords. 2. Hash exposure: Multiple API endpoints (/user/info, /user/update, /spend/users) return the password hash field in responses to any authenticated user regardless of role. Plaintext passwords could also potentially be exposed in certain scenarios. 4. Pass-the-hash: The /v2/login endpoint accepts the raw SHA-256 hash as a valid password without re

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-69x8-hrgq-fjj8 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works