How severe is GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf?

GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf has a CVSS score of 6.5/10, rated MEDIUM. Review your exposure and patch according to your risk tolerance.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf?

GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf affects the following packages: github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum (Go). Ecosystems affected: Go.

How do I fix GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf?

Update github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum to 1.9.17 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf in my Go dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

How do I mitigate GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Is GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf?

GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 1.2%, placing it in the 68th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf?

GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf is classified as CWE-682 (CWE-682). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation.

When was GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf was published on June 29, 2021 and was last updated on July 8, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

🐹

🐹 Go

Not in CISA KEV

MEDIUM severity

Shallow copy bug in gethGHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf

MEDIUMFix: ethereum/go-ethereum@2956937

GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) CWE-682 vulnerability in github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum. A fix is available for github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2020-26241GO-2022-0771

Published

Jun 29, 2021

Updated

Jul 8, 2026

Affected

1 pkg

Patched

1 / 1

Exploits

None indexed

Exploitation data as of Oct 12, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

1.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk0.00%

Lower risk than most CVEs68th percentile — riskier than 68% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 385,987 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

🐹github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

This is a Consensus vulnerability, which can be used to cause a chain-split where vulnerable nodes reject the canonical chain.

Geth’s pre-compiled dataCopy (at 0x00...04) contract did a shallow copy on invocation. An attacker could deploy a contract that

writes X to an EVM memory region R,
calls 0x00..04 with R as an argument,
overwrites R to Y,
and finally invokes the RETURNDATACOPY opcode.

When this contract is invoked, a consensus-compliant node would push X on the EVM stack, whereas Geth would push Y.

Patches

No standalone patches have been made.

Workarounds

Upgrade to 1.9.17 or higher.

References

https://blog.ethereum.org/2020/11/12/geth_security_release/

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Open an issue in go-ethereum
Email us at [email protected]

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
🐹Go	`github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum`	≥ 1.9.7&&< 1.9.17	1.9.17`go get github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum@v1.9.17`

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations

Application

go ethereumethereum

< 1.9.17

range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum to 1.9.17 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact This is a Consensus vulnerability, which can be used to cause a chain-split where vulnerable nodes reject the canonical chain. Geth’s pre-compiled `dataCopy` (at `0x00...04`) contract did a shallow copy on invocation. An attacker could deploy a contract that - writes `X` to an EVM memory region `R`, - calls `0x00..04` with `R` as an argument, - overwrites `R` to `Y`, - and finally invokes the `RETURNDATACOPY` opcode. When this contract is invoked, a consensus-compliant node would push `X` on the EVM stack, whereas Geth would push `Y`. ### Patches No standalone patches have b

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf in your dependencies?

Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works

CVSS Score

6.5/10CVSS v3 base

Vector breakdown

Attack Vector

Network

Attack Complexity

Low

Privileges Required

Low

User Interaction

None

Scope

Unchanged

Confidentiality

None

Integrity

High

Availability

None

Raw vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

CWE Classification

CWE-682CWE-682

Weaponization

No known public exploit tooling found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

Package health score

go-ethereum

6.3/10

Code-Review9/10

Maintained10/10

Branch-Protection3/10

Assessed Oct 12, 2026

Timeline

Disclosed

Jun 29, 2021

Last updated

Jul 8, 2026

Identifiers

GHSA-69v6-xc2j-r2jf

GO-2022-0771

References

Advisorynvd.nist.gov Webgithub.com Webgithub.com Webblog.ethereum.org Packagegithub.com

Related vulnerabilities

This CVE is medium severity; 8 of 8 other CVEs affecting go-ethereum are rated as high or higher (top: high).

CVE-2026-26314CVE-2026-26313CVE-2026-26315CVE-2026-22868CVE-2026-22862CVE-2025-24883CVE-2024-32972CVE-2023-42319

Provenance

Sources

OSV.devNVDFIRST.org (EPSS)

Last verifiedJul 8, 2026