Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
💎
💎 RubyGems
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

GHSA-68xg-gqqm-vgj8 — puma

CRITICALFix: puma/puma@690155e

GHSA-68xg-gqqm-vgj8 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) CWE-444 vulnerability in puma. A fix is available for puma — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Puma HTTP Request/Response Smuggling vulnerability

Also known asCVE-2023-40175
Published
Aug 18, 2023
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 25, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-68xg-gqqm-vgj8.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.8%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs56th percentile — riskier than 56% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-68xg-gqqm-vgj8 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 378,567 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
💎puma💎puma

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects RubyGems packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

Prior to version 6.3.1, puma exhibited incorrect behavior when parsing chunked transfer encoding bodies and zero-length Content-Length headers in a way that allowed HTTP request smuggling.

The following vulnerabilities are addressed by this advisory:

  • Incorrect parsing of trailing fields in chunked transfer encoding bodies
  • Parsing of blank/zero-length Content-Length headers

Patches

The vulnerability has been fixed in 6.3.1 and 5.6.7.

Workarounds

No known workarounds.

References

HTTP Request Smuggling

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Open an issue in Puma See our security policy

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
💎RubyGemspumaall versions5.6.7bundle update puma --conservative
💎RubyGemspuma≥ 6.0.0&&< 6.3.16.3.1bundle update puma --conservative

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for puma, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update puma to 5.6.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-68xg-gqqm-vgj8 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-68xg-gqqm-vgj8 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-68xg-gqqm-vgj8. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Satellite 6.14 for RHEL 8rubygem-puma-0:6.3.1-1.el8satRHSA-2024:0797

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Prior to version 6.3.1, puma exhibited incorrect behavior when parsing chunked transfer encoding bodies and zero-length Content-Length headers in a way that allowed HTTP request smuggling. The following vulnerabilities are addressed by this advisory: * Incorrect parsing of trailing fields in chunked transfer encoding bodies * Parsing of blank/zero-length Content-Length headers ### Patches The vulnerability has been fixed in 6.3.1 and 5.6.7. ### Workarounds No known workarounds. ### References [HTTP Request Smuggling](https://portswigger.net/web-security/request-smuggling) ###
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-68xg-gqqm-vgj8 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-68xg-gqqm-vgj8 across RubyGems dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-68xg-gqqm-vgj8: puma (Critical 9.8) | O3 Security