NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

Cross-site Scripting in MLFlowGHSA-6749-m5cp-6cg7

CRITICALFix: mlflow/mlflow#10873

GHSA-6749-m5cp-6cg7 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.6) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in mlflow. 1 public exploit or proof-of-concept reference is indexed, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for mlflow — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asBIT-mlflow-2024-27132CVE-2024-27132PYSEC-2024-240
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Nov 8, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-6749-m5cp-6cg7.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.9%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs59th percentile — riskier than 59% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.46%0.92%1.38%0.2%0.9%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍mlflow

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Insufficient sanitization in MLflow leads to XSS when running an untrusted recipe.

This issue leads to a client-side RCE when running an untrusted recipe in Jupyter Notebook.

The vulnerability stems from lack of sanitization over template variables.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPImlflowall versions2.10.0pip install --upgrade 'mlflow==2.10.0'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
mlflowlfprojects
≤ 2.9.2
range
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for mlflow, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update mlflow to 2.10.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-6749-m5cp-6cg7 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Insufficient sanitization in MLflow leads to XSS when running an untrusted recipe. This issue leads to a client-side RCE when running an untrusted recipe in Jupyter Notebook. The vulnerability stems from lack of sanitization over template variables.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-6749-m5cp-6cg7 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

Cross-site Scripting in MLFlow (Critical 9.6)