How severe is GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx?

GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx has a CVSS score of 7.1/10, rated HIGH. Immediate patching is strongly recommended.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx?

GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx affects the following packages: mlflow (PyPI). Ecosystems affected: PyPI.

How do I fix GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx?

Update mlflow to 3.9.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx in my PyPI dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for mlflow. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

How do I mitigate GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

How does O3 Security protect against GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx?

O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Is GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

When was GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx was published on May 11, 2026 and was last updated on July 13, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

🐍

🐍 PyPI

Not in CISA KEV

HIGH severity

GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx

HIGHFix: mlflow/mlflow@64aa0ab

GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx is a high-severity (CVSS 7.1) vulnerability in mlflow. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

MLflow Has a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability

Also known asBIT-mlflow-2026-2393CVE-2026-2393PYSEC-2026-2219

Published

May 11, 2026

Updated

Jul 13, 2026

Affected

1 pkg

Patched

1 / 1

Exploits

None indexed

Exploitation data as of Jul 13, 2026 · OSV.dev, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

🐍mlflow

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in MLflow versions prior to 3.9.0. The _create_webhook() function in mlflow/server/handlers.py accepts a user-controlled url parameter without validation, and the _send_webhook_request() function in mlflow/webhooks/delivery.py sends HTTP POST requests to this attacker-controlled URL. This allows an authenticated attacker to force the MLflow backend to send HTTP requests to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, or arbitrary external servers. The lack of input sanitization, URL scheme filtering, or allowlist validation on the webhook URL enables exploitation, potentially leading to cloud credential theft, internal network access, and data exfiltration.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
🐍PyPI	`mlflow`	all versions	3.9.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for mlflow. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update mlflow to 3.9.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in MLflow versions prior to 3.9.0. The `_create_webhook()` function in `mlflow/server/handlers.py` accepts a user-controlled `url` parameter without validation, and the `_send_webhook_request()` function in `mlflow/webhooks/delivery.py` sends HTTP POST requests to this attacker-controlled URL. This allows an authenticated attacker to force the MLflow backend to send HTTP requests to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, or arbitrary external servers. The lack of input sanitization, URL scheme filtering, or allowlist validation on

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-65h7-c7c4-mghx across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works