Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
☕
☕ Maven
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-5xrh-qmmq-w6ch — netty-transport-sctp

HIGH

GHSA-5xrh-qmmq-w6ch is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-770 vulnerability in io.netty:netty-transport-sctp. A fix is available for io.netty:netty-transport-sctp — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Netty: SCTP reassembly nests buffers without bound

Also known asCVE-2026-46340
Published
Jun 8, 2026
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 26, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-5xrh-qmmq-w6ch.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.8%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs56th percentile — riskier than 56% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-5xrh-qmmq-w6ch by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 379,842 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
☕io.netty:netty-transport-sctp☕io.netty:netty-transport-sctp

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. In versions of netty-transport-sctp prior to 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final, for each non-complete SctpMessage fragment the handler does fragments.put(streamId, Unpooled.wrappedBuffer(frag, byteBuf)), wrapping the previous accumulator and the new slice into a new CompositeByteBuf every time. After N fragments the accumulator is an N-deep chain of composites, each holding references and component arrays; readableBytes()/getBytes() on the final buffer recurse N levels. There is no limit on N, on total bytes, or on the number of streamIdentifiers an attacker can open (each gets its own map entry). A peer that never sets the complete flag can grow this structure indefinitely from tiny 1-byte DATA chunks. Versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final patch the issue.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
☕Mavenio.netty:netty-transport-sctp≥ 4.2.0.Final&&< 4.2.15.Final4.2.15.Finalio.netty:netty-transport-sctp:4.2.15.Final
☕Mavenio.netty:netty-transport-sctpall versions4.1.135.Finalio.netty:netty-transport-sctp:4.1.135.Final

Affected Products

1 product · 2 configurations
Application
nettynetty
≥ 4.2.0 && < 4.2.15
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for io.netty:netty-transport-sctp, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update io.netty:netty-transport-sctp to 4.2.15.Final or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-5xrh-qmmq-w6ch is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant

An Important denial of service flaw exists in `netty-transport-sctp`, a component used across various Red Hat products. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending fragmented Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) messages without the completion flag. This leads to unbounded…

Workaround published by Red Hat
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-5xrh-qmmq-w6ch (CC BY 4.0)
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.1.P1 for Spring Boot 3.5.16netty-transport-sctpRHSA-2026:37390
Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.2netty-transport-sctpRHSA-2026:41951
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.25io.netty/netty-transport-sctp:4.1.135.Final-redhat-00001RHSA-2026:53806
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7eap7-activemq-artemis-0:2.16.0-22.redhat_00057.1.el7eapRHSA-2026:53644
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 8eap7-activemq-artemis-0:2.16.0-22.redhat_00057.1.el8eapRHSA-2026:53645
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 9eap7-activemq-artemis-0:2.16.0-22.redhat_00057.1.el9eapRHSA-2026:53646
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1netty-transport-sctpRHSA-2026:50085

Frequently Asked Questions

For each non-complete SctpMessage fragment the handler does `fragments.put(streamId, Unpooled.wrappedBuffer(frag, byteBuf))`, wrapping the previous accumulator and the new slice into a *new* CompositeByteBuf every time. After N fragments the accumulator is an N-deep chain of composites, each holding references and component arrays; readableBytes()/getBytes() on the final buffer recurse N levels. There is no limit on N, on total bytes, or on the number of streamIdentifiers an attacker can open (each gets its own map entry). A peer that never sets the `complete` flag can grow this structure inde
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-5xrh-qmmq-w6ch in your dependencies?

Find it across Maven, including transitive dependencies.