Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

NLTK: Missing Post-Download Integrity Verification Allows Malicious Package InjectionGHSA-5wp5-5229-5g6q

MEDIUMFix: nltk/nltk#3449

GHSA-5wp5-5229-5g6q is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-494 vulnerability in nltk. A fix is available for nltk — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-12259CVE-2026-63310GHSA-gf32-cmjh-8m9vPYSEC-2026-3729PYSEC-2026-4318
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 24, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-5wp5-5229-5g6q.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.1%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk-0.04%
Lower risk than most CVEs1th percentile — riskier than 1% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.21%0.43%0.64%0.1%0.1%0.1%Sep 26Oct 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-5wp5-5229-5g6q by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 395,249 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍nltk

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

NLTK's package downloader in nltk/downloader.py does not verify file integrity after download and before extraction.

The download flow at lines 789-825:

  1. File is downloaded to a temp path via HTTP
  2. os.replace(tmp_filepath, filepath) moves it to the final location (line 799)
  3. Extraction begins via _unzip_iter() (line 825)

Between steps 2 and 3, there is no SHA-256 verification. The checksum logic exists in _pkg_status() (lines 982-1015) but it is only used BEFORE download as a status check ("is this package already installed and up-to-date?"). It is never called after download to verify the file that was actually received.

Attack vectors:

  1. MITM during HTTP download (NLTK downloads from http:// by default on some mirrors)
  2. Race condition on shared filesystems (attacker replaces file between os.replace and _unzip_iter)
  3. DNS poisoning redirecting to attacker-controlled server

PoC:

import nltk
import unittest.mock
import zipfile
import io
import os

# Create a malicious zip that will be "downloaded"
malicious_zip = io.BytesIO()
with zipfile.ZipFile(malicious_zip, 'w') as zf:
    zf.writestr('punkt_tab/tokenizers/punkt_tab/english.pickle', 
                b'MALICIOUS PAYLOAD - attacker controlled content')

# Patch urllib to return our malicious zip
with unittest.mock.patch('urllib.request.urlopen') as mock_urlopen:
    mock_response = unittest.mock.MagicMock()
    mock_response.read.return_value = malicious_zip.getvalue()
    mock_response.headers = {'Content-Length': str(len(malicious_zip.getvalue()))}
    mock_urlopen.return_value = mock_response
    
    # Download proceeds, no integrity check catches the swap
    # nltk.download('punkt_tab')  # Would install attacker payload

This is distinct from CVE-2024-39705 (pickle deserialization via download) and CVE-2025-14009 (zip-slip path traversal). Those address what happens AFTER extraction. This finding addresses the gap BEFORE extraction where integrity is never verified.

Suggested fix: After os.replace() and before _unzip_iter(), compute SHA-256 of the final file and compare against the expected checksum from the package index. Reject and delete the file if the hash does not match.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPInltkall versions3.9.3pip install --upgrade 'nltk==3.9.3'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
nltknltk
1 version
3.9.4

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nltk, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update nltk to 3.9.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-5wp5-5229-5g6q is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Do not deserialise data from untrusted sources: where the format allows it, restrict deserialisation to an explicit allowlist of expected types, and prefer a data-only format (JSON, Protobuf) over one that can reconstruct arbitrary objects until you can upgrade.

Frequently Asked Questions

NLTK's package downloader in nltk/downloader.py does not verify file integrity after download and before extraction. The download flow at lines 789-825: 1. File is downloaded to a temp path via HTTP 2. os.replace(tmp_filepath, filepath) moves it to the final location (line 799) 3. Extraction begins via _unzip_iter() (line 825) Between steps 2 and 3, there is no SHA-256 verification. The checksum logic exists in _pkg_status() (lines 982-1015) but it is only used BEFORE download as a status check ("is this package already installed and up-to-date?"). It is never called after download to verify
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-5wp5-5229-5g6q in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

NLTK: Missing Post-Download Integrity Verification…