GHSA-5jv2-g5wq-cmr4 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Information Exposure vulnerability in vllm. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-5jv2-g5wq-cmr4 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
vLLM: GGUF dequantize kernel int truncation exposes uninitialized GPU memory in multi-tenant serving
Real-World Exposure
vllmReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Integer truncation of tensor dimensions in vLLM's GGUF dequantize kernels (csrc/quantization/gguf/gguf_kernel.cu) causes partial tensor processing. The output tensor is allocated at full size via torch::empty (uninitialized memory), but the dequantize CUDA kernel processes only a truncated number of elements. The unfilled portion of the output tensor retains whatever was previously in GPU memory. In multi-tenant inference deployments, this residual GPU memory may contain tensor data from other users' inference requests, constituting information disclosure.
Root Cause
The to_cuda_ggml_t function pointer type at ggml-common.h:1067 declares its element count parameter as int (32-bit):
using to_cuda_ggml_t = void (*)(const void * __restrict__ x,
dst_t * __restrict__ y,
int k, // 32-bit
cudaStream_t stream);
All dequantize kernel functions (dequantize_block_cuda, dequantize_row_q2_K_cuda, etc. in dequantize.cuh) inherit this int k parameter and use it as the kernel launch grid size:
static void dequantize_block_cuda(..., const int k, cudaStream_t stream) {
const int num_blocks = (k + 2*CUDA_DEQUANTIZE_BLOCK_SIZE - 1) / (2*CUDA_DEQUANTIZE_BLOCK_SIZE);
dequantize_block<<<num_blocks, CUDA_DEQUANTIZE_BLOCK_SIZE, 0, stream>>>(vx, y, k);
}
In ggml_dequantize() at gguf_kernel.cu:85, the caller passes m * n (an int64_t product) to this int k parameter:
at::Tensor DW = torch::empty({m, n}, options); // line 80: full-size, UNINITIALIZED
// ...
to_cuda((void*)W.data_ptr(), (scalar_t*)DW.data_ptr(), m * n, stream); // line 85: m*n truncated to int
When m * n > INT_MAX, the truncated k is smaller than the actual tensor size. The kernel processes k elements. The remaining (m * n) - k elements in DW are never written and contain stale GPU memory.
This is a single root cause -- the int type on the k parameter in to_cuda_ggml_t -- with a single fix: change int k to int64_t k. All dequantize functions inherit this type through the same typedef.
Affected Functions
All in csrc/quantization/gguf/gguf_kernel.cu:
| Function | Line | Allocation | Info Disclosure? |
|---|---|---|---|
ggml_dequantize | 74 | torch::empty({m, n}) at line 80 | Yes -- m*n truncated to int k at line 85 |
ggml_mul_mat_vec_a8 | 91 | torch::empty({vecs, row}) at line 99 | Yes -- int col = X.sizes()[1] at line 94 |
ggml_mul_mat_a8 | 207 | torch::empty({batch, row}) at line 215 | Yes -- int col = X.sizes()[1] at line 210 |
ggml_moe_a8 | 279 | torch::empty({tokens*top_k, row}) at line 289 | Yes -- int col = X.sizes()[1] at line 285 |
All four functions allocate output tensors with torch::empty (uninitialized) and then run CUDA kernels that use truncated dimension values as loop bounds. The unfilled portion of each output tensor retains stale GPU memory.
ggml_moe_a8_vec (line 382) uses torch::zeros instead of torch::empty, so it is not affected by the info disclosure variant.
Impact: Information Disclosure in Multi-Tenant Serving
vLLM is designed for multi-tenant inference serving. GPU memory is reused across requests from different users. When the dequantize kernel partially fills an output tensor:
- The output tensor
DWis allocated withtorch::empty-- the buffer contains whatever was previously in that GPU memory region - The dequantize kernel fills only a truncated portion of the buffer
- The unfilled portion retains residual data from prior GPU operations, which may include tensor data from other users' inference requests
- The contaminated tensor proceeds through the model computation
- No error or warning is generated -- the partial fill is silent
This is a confidentiality violation. In shared inference deployments (the primary vLLM use case), one user's inference data can leak into another user's model computation through residual GPU memory.
Attacker Control
The attacker crafts a GGUF model file with weight tensor dimensions whose product exceeds INT_MAX (e.g., a matrix with shape [65536, 65536] gives m * n = 4,294,967,296). The model is hosted on HuggingFace or any model hub. The victim loads the model with vLLM for inference serving. The truncation happens automatically during model weight dequantization.
Fix
A fix for this vulnerability was added here: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/44971
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | vllm | ≥ 0.5.5&&< 0.24.0 | 0.24.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vllm. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update vllm to 0.24.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-5jv2-g5wq-cmr4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-5jv2-g5wq-cmr4 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-5jv2-g5wq-cmr4. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-5jv2-g5wq-cmr4 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-5jv2-g5wq-cmr4 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.