Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-5j53-63w8-8625 fastapi-users

MEDIUMFix: fastapi-users/fastapi-users@7cf413c

GHSA-5j53-63w8-8625 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.9) CWE-285 vulnerability in fastapi-users. A fix is available for fastapi-users — see the affected versions and patch details below.

FastAPI Users Vulnerable to 1-click Account Takeover in Apps Using FastAPI SSO

Also known asCVE-2025-68481PYSEC-2026-1363
Published
Dec 19, 2025
Updated
Jul 7, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 17, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-5j53-63w8-8625.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs18th percentile — riskier than 18% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-5j53-63w8-8625 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍fastapi-users

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Description

The OAuth login state tokens are completely stateless and carry no per-request entropy or any data that could link them to the session that initiated the OAuth flow. generate_state_token() is always called with an empty state_data dict, so the resulting JWT only contains the fixed audience claim plus an expiration timestamp. [1]

        state_data: dict[str, str] = {}
        state = generate_state_token(state_data, state_secret)
        authorization_url = await oauth_client.get_authorization_url(
            authorize_redirect_url,
            state,
            scopes,
        )

fastapi_users/router/oauth.py:65-71

On callback, the library merely checks that the JWT verifies under state_secret and is unexpired; there is no attempt to match the state value to the browser that initiated the OAuth request, no correlation cookie, and no server-side cache. [2]

        try:
            decode_jwt(state, state_secret, [STATE_TOKEN_AUDIENCE])
        except jwt.DecodeError:
            raise HTTPException(
                status_code=status.HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST,
                detail=ErrorCode.ACCESS_TOKEN_DECODE_ERROR,
            )
        except jwt.ExpiredSignatureError:
            raise HTTPException(
                status_code=status.HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST,
                detail=ErrorCode.ACCESS_TOKEN_ALREADY_EXPIRED,
            )

fastapi_users/router/oauth.py:130-141

Any attacker can hit /authorize, capture the server-generated state, finish the upstream OAuth flow with their own provider account, and then trick a victim into loading .../callback?code=<attacker_code>&state=<attacker_state>. Because the state JWT is valid for any client for ~1 hour, the victim’s browser will complete the flow. This leads to login CSRF. Depending on the app’s logic, the login CSRF can lead to an account takeover of the victim account or to the victim user getting logged in to the attacker's account.

[1] https://github.com/fastapi-users/fastapi-users/blob/bcee8c9b884de31decb5d799aead3974a0b5b158/fastapi_users/router/oauth.py#L57

[2]
https://github.com/fastapi-users/fastapi-users/blob/bcee8c9b884de31decb5d799aead3974a0b5b158/fastapi_users/router/oauth.py#L111

Proof of Concept

Let’s think of an app - AwesomeFastAPIApp. Let’s assume that the AwesomeFastAPIApp has internal logic that uses a UserManager different from the default BaseUserManager. With this manager, when an already logged-in user performs a callback request, the newly provided SSO identity gets linked to the already existing user that made the request.

Then, an attacker can get account takeover inside the app by performing the following actions:

1. They start an SSO OAuth flow, but stop it right before making the callback call to AwesomeFastAPIApp;
2. The attacker tricks a logged-in user (via phishing, a drive-by attack, etc.) to perform a GET request with the attacker's state value and grant code to the AwesomeFastAPIApp callback. Because the library doesn’t check whether the state token is linked to the session performing the callback, the callback is processed, the grant code is sent to the provider, and the account linking takes place.

After the GET request is performed, the attacker's SSO account is linked with the victim's AwesomeFastAPIApp account permanently.

Suggested Fix

Make the state a value tied to the session of the user that initiated the OAuth flow, as recommended by the official RFC. [3]

[3] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6749#section-10.12

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIfastapi-usersall versions15.0.2pip install --upgrade 'fastapi-users==15.0.2'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for fastapi-users, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update fastapi-users to 15.0.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-5j53-63w8-8625 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-5j53-63w8-8625 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-5j53-63w8-8625. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

**Description** The OAuth login state tokens are completely stateless and carry no per-request entropy or any data that could link them to the session that initiated the OAuth flow. `generate_state_token()` is always called with an empty `state_data` dict, so the resulting JWT only contains the fixed audience claim plus an expiration timestamp. \[1\] ```py state_data: dict[str, str] = {} state = generate_state_token(state_data, state_secret) authorization_url = await oauth_client.get_authorization_url( authorize_redirect_url, state,
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-5j53-63w8-8625 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-5j53-63w8-8625 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-5j53-63w8-8625: CSRF (Medium 5.9) | O3 Security