Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀
🦀 crates.io
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-5h46-h7hh-c6x9 hyper

MEDIUM

GHSA-5h46-h7hh-c6x9 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.9) CWE-190 vulnerability in hyper. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for hyper — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Integer Overflow in Chunked Transfer-Encoding

Also known asCVE-2021-32714RUSTSEC-2021-0079
Published
Jul 12, 2021
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Sep 19, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.1%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs65th percentile — riskier than 65% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-5h46-h7hh-c6x9 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 376,715 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🦀hyper

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

hyper's HTTP server and client code had a flaw that could trigger an integer overflow when decoding chunk sizes that are too big. This allows possible data loss, or if combined with an upstream HTTP proxy that allows chunk sizes larger than hyper does, can result in "request smuggling" or "desync attacks".

Vulnerability

Example:

GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Transfer-Encoding: chunked

f0000000000000003
abc
0

hyper only reads the rightmost 64-bit integer as the chunk size. So it reads f0000000000000003 as 3. A loss of data can occur since hyper would then read only 3 bytes of the body. Additionally, an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability would occur if using a proxy which instead has prefix truncation in the chunk size, or that understands larger than 64-bit chunk sizes.

Read more about desync attacks: https://portswigger.net/research/http-desync-attacks-request-smuggling-reborn

Impact

To determine if vulnerable to data loss, these things must be true:

  • Using HTTP/1.1. Since HTTP/2 does not use chunked encoding, it is not vulnerable.
  • Using hyper as a server or client. The body would be improperly truncated in either case.
  • Users send requests or responses with chunk sizes greater than 18 exabytes.

To determine if vulnerable to desync attacks, these things must be true:

  • Using an upstream proxy that allows chunks sizes larger than 64-bit. If the proxy rejects chunk sizes that are too large, that request won't be forwarded to hyper.

Patches

We have released the following patch versions:

  • v0.14.10 (to be released when this advisory is published)

Workarounds

Besides upgrading hyper, you can take the following options:

  • Reject requests manually that contain a Transfer-Encoding header.
  • Ensure any upstream proxy rejects Transfer-Encoding chunk sizes greater than what fits in 64-bit unsigned integers.

Credits

This issue was initially reported by Mattias Grenfeldt and Asta Olofsson.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.iohyperall versions0.14.10cargo update -p hyper --precise 0.14.10
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for hyper, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update hyper to 0.14.10 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-5h46-h7hh-c6x9 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-5h46-h7hh-c6x9 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-5h46-h7hh-c6x9. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary hyper's HTTP server and client code had a flaw that could trigger an integer overflow when decoding chunk sizes that are too big. This allows possible data loss, or if combined with an upstream HTTP proxy that allows chunk sizes larger than hyper does, can result in "request smuggling" or "desync attacks". ### Vulnerability Example: ``` GET / HTTP/1.1 Host: example.com Transfer-Encoding: chunked f0000000000000003 abc 0 ``` hyper only reads the rightmost 64-bit integer as the chunk size. So it reads `f0000000000000003` as `3`. A loss of data can occur since hyper would then r
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-5h46-h7hh-c6x9 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-5h46-h7hh-c6x9 across crates.io dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-5h46-h7hh-c6x9: hyper (Medium 5.9) | O3 Security