How severe is GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35?

No CVSS score has been assigned to GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35 yet. Review the advisory details and affected package list to assess your exposure.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35?

Affected package information for GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35 is not yet fully mapped. Check the official advisory links for details.

How do I fix GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35?

Upgrade the affected component to the fixed release for GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35, or apply your distribution's backported patch — distro builds are often patched at an older version number, so check your vendor's advisory rather than the upstream version alone.

How do I detect GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35 in my code and dependencies?

Identify every host running the affected component and compare the installed build against the fixed version below — for source-built or distro-packaged software the version string, not a lockfile, is the source of truth (`dpkg -l`, `rpm -q`, or the binary's own `--version`).

How do I mitigate GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35 if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Is GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35 actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35 yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35?

GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35 has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.3%, placing it in the 22th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35?

GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35 is classified as CWE-488 (CWE-488). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation.

When was GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35 published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35 was published on October 22, 2026 and was last updated on October 24, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

Traefik v3.2.0 before v3.7.14 FastProxy NTLM/Negotiate…

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk0.00%

Lower risk than most CVEs22th percentile — riskier than 22% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Description

Traefik from v3.2.0 before v3.7.14 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the experimental FastProxy connection pool, which fails to pin NTLM/Negotiate-authenticated backend connections to their frontend connection. Unauthenticated clients can be handed a pooled keep-alive backend connection where a victim completed an NTLM or Negotiate handshake, letting them read victim data and act as that victim.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Vulnerability

Detect
Identify every host running the affected component and compare the installed build against the fixed version below — for source-built or distro-packaged software the version string, not a lockfile, is the source of truth (`dpkg -l`, `rpm -q`, or the binary's own `--version`).
Fix
Upgrade the affected component to the fixed release for GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35, or apply your distribution's backported patch — distro builds are often patched at an older version number, so check your vendor's advisory rather than the upstream version alone.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Frequently Asked Questions

Traefik from v3.2.0 before v3.7.14 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the experimental FastProxy connection pool, which fails to pin NTLM/Negotiate-authenticated backend connections to their frontend connection. Unauthenticated clients can be handed a pooled keep-alive backend connection where a victim completed an NTLM or Negotiate handshake, letting them read victim data and act as that victim.

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35 in your dependencies?

Find it across , including transitive dependencies.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works

Traefik v3.2.0 before v3.7.14 FastProxy NTLM/Negotiate Connection Pool Identity LeakGHSA-53qr-784g-cj35

EPSS Exploitation Probability

Description

Detection & mitigation playbook

Detect

Fix

Workarounds

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35 in your dependencies?