Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀 crates.io

GHSA-52xf-5p2m-9wrv

s2n-tls has a potentially observable differences in RSA premaster secret handling

Published
Jun 6, 2024
Updated
Feb 4, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🦀s2n-tls

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

When receiving a message from a client that sent an invalid RSA premaster secret, an issue in s2n-tls results in the server performing additional processing when the premaster secret contains an incorrect client hello version. While no practical attack on s2n-tls has been demonstrated, this causes a small timing difference which could theoretically be used as described in the Marvin Attack [1].

We would like to thank Hubert Kario [2] for reporting this issue.

Impact

The extent of this issue is a timing difference. No practical attack on s2n-tls has been demonstrated.

This issue affects server applications that permit RSA key exchange. Applications that use the default, built-in blinding feature or properly implement self-service blinding are not affected.

Impacted versions: <= v1.4.15.

Patches

The patch is included in v1.4.16 [3].

Workarounds

Applications can work around this issue by using an s2n-tls security policy that disallows RSA key exchange.

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory we ask that you contact AWS/Amazon Security via our vulnerability reporting page [4] or directly via email to [email protected]. Please do not create a public GitHub issue.

[1] https://people.redhat.com/~hkario/marvin/ [2] https://github.com/tomato42 [3] https://github.com/aws/s2n-tls/releases/tag/v1.4.16 [4] https://aws.amazon.com/security/vulnerability-reporting

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.ios2n-tlsall versions0.2.7

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for s2n-tls. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update s2n-tls to 0.2.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-52xf-5p2m-9wrv is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-52xf-5p2m-9wrv is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-52xf-5p2m-9wrv. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

When receiving a message from a client that sent an invalid RSA premaster secret, an issue in s2n-tls results in the server performing additional processing when the premaster secret contains an incorrect client hello version. While no practical attack on s2n-tls has been demonstrated, this causes a small timing difference which could theoretically be used as described in the Marvin Attack [1]. We would like to thank Hubert Kario [2] for reporting this issue. ### Impact The extent of this issue is a timing difference. No practical attack on s2n-tls has been demonstrated. This issue affect
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-52xf-5p2m-9wrv in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-52xf-5p2m-9wrv across crates.io dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.